Cargando…

Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease

It is unclear whether insertions and deletions (indels) are more likely to influence complex traits than abundant single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We sought to understand which category of variation is more likely to impact health. Using the SardiNIA study as an exemplar, we characterized 478...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gagliano, Sarah A., Sengupta, Sebanti, Sidore, Carlo, Maschio, Andrea, Cucca, Francesco, Schlessinger, David, Abecasis, Gonçalo R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30565766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.22175
_version_ 1783386923792859136
author Gagliano, Sarah A.
Sengupta, Sebanti
Sidore, Carlo
Maschio, Andrea
Cucca, Francesco
Schlessinger, David
Abecasis, Gonçalo R.
author_facet Gagliano, Sarah A.
Sengupta, Sebanti
Sidore, Carlo
Maschio, Andrea
Cucca, Francesco
Schlessinger, David
Abecasis, Gonçalo R.
author_sort Gagliano, Sarah A.
collection PubMed
description It is unclear whether insertions and deletions (indels) are more likely to influence complex traits than abundant single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We sought to understand which category of variation is more likely to impact health. Using the SardiNIA study as an exemplar, we characterized 478,876 common indels and 8,246,244 common SNPs in up to 5,949 well‐phenotyped individuals from an isolated valley in Sardinia. We assessed association between 120 traits, resulting in 89 nonoverlapping‐associated loci.We evaluated whether indels were enriched among credible sets of potential causal variants. These credible sets included 1,319 SNPs and 88 indels. We did not find indels to be significantly enriched. Indels were the most likely causal variant in seven loci, including one locus associated with monocyte count where an indel with causality and mechanism previously demonstrated (rs200748895:TGCTG/T) had a 0.999 posterior probability. Overall, our results show a very modest and nonsignificant enrichment for common indels in associated loci.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6330128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63301282019-05-21 Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease Gagliano, Sarah A. Sengupta, Sebanti Sidore, Carlo Maschio, Andrea Cucca, Francesco Schlessinger, David Abecasis, Gonçalo R. Genet Epidemiol Brief Report It is unclear whether insertions and deletions (indels) are more likely to influence complex traits than abundant single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We sought to understand which category of variation is more likely to impact health. Using the SardiNIA study as an exemplar, we characterized 478,876 common indels and 8,246,244 common SNPs in up to 5,949 well‐phenotyped individuals from an isolated valley in Sardinia. We assessed association between 120 traits, resulting in 89 nonoverlapping‐associated loci.We evaluated whether indels were enriched among credible sets of potential causal variants. These credible sets included 1,319 SNPs and 88 indels. We did not find indels to be significantly enriched. Indels were the most likely causal variant in seven loci, including one locus associated with monocyte count where an indel with causality and mechanism previously demonstrated (rs200748895:TGCTG/T) had a 0.999 posterior probability. Overall, our results show a very modest and nonsignificant enrichment for common indels in associated loci. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-22 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6330128/ /pubmed/30565766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.22175 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Genetic Epidemiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Gagliano, Sarah A.
Sengupta, Sebanti
Sidore, Carlo
Maschio, Andrea
Cucca, Francesco
Schlessinger, David
Abecasis, Gonçalo R.
Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease
title Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease
title_full Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease
title_fullStr Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease
title_full_unstemmed Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease
title_short Relative impact of indels versus SNPs on complex disease
title_sort relative impact of indels versus snps on complex disease
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30565766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.22175
work_keys_str_mv AT gaglianosaraha relativeimpactofindelsversussnpsoncomplexdisease
AT senguptasebanti relativeimpactofindelsversussnpsoncomplexdisease
AT sidorecarlo relativeimpactofindelsversussnpsoncomplexdisease
AT maschioandrea relativeimpactofindelsversussnpsoncomplexdisease
AT cuccafrancesco relativeimpactofindelsversussnpsoncomplexdisease
AT schlessingerdavid relativeimpactofindelsversussnpsoncomplexdisease
AT abecasisgoncalor relativeimpactofindelsversussnpsoncomplexdisease