Cargando…

Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process

BACKGROUND: The production of therapeutically active single chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody is still challenging in E. coli due to the aggregation propensity of recombinant protein into inclusion bodies (IBs). However, recent advancement of biotechnology has shown substantial recovery of bio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarker, Animesh, Rathore, Abhishek Singh, Gupta, Rinkoo Devi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1053-9
_version_ 1783387022803599360
author Sarker, Animesh
Rathore, Abhishek Singh
Gupta, Rinkoo Devi
author_facet Sarker, Animesh
Rathore, Abhishek Singh
Gupta, Rinkoo Devi
author_sort Sarker, Animesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The production of therapeutically active single chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody is still challenging in E. coli due to the aggregation propensity of recombinant protein into inclusion bodies (IBs). However, recent advancement of biotechnology has shown substantial recovery of bioactive protein from such insoluble IBs by solubilization and refolding processes. In addition, gene fusion technology has also widely been used to improve the soluble protein production using E. coli. This study demonstrates that mild-solubilization and in vitro refolding strategies, both are capable to recover soluble scFv protein from bacterial IBs, although the degree of success is greatly influenced by different fusion tags with the target protein. RESULTS: It was observed that the most commonly used fusion tag, i.e., maltose binding protein (MBP) was not only influenced the cytoplasmic expression in E. coli but also greatly improved the in vitro refolding yield of scFv protein. On the other hand, mild solubilization process potentially could recover soluble and functional scFv protein from non-classical IBs without assistance of any fusion tag and in vitro refolding step. The recovery yield achieved by mild solubilization process was also found higher than denaturation–refolding method except while scFv was refolded in fusion with MBP tag. Concomitantly, it was also observed that the soluble protein achieved by mild solubilization process was better structured and functionally more active than the one achieved by in vitro refolding method in the absence of MBP tag or refolding enhancer. CONCLUSIONS: Maltose binding protein tagged scFv has shown better refolding and solubility yields as compare to mild solubilization process. However, in terms of cost, time and tag free nature, mild solubilization method for scFv recovery from bacterial IBs is considerable for therapeutic application and further structural studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12934-019-1053-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6330739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63307392019-01-16 Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process Sarker, Animesh Rathore, Abhishek Singh Gupta, Rinkoo Devi Microb Cell Fact Research BACKGROUND: The production of therapeutically active single chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody is still challenging in E. coli due to the aggregation propensity of recombinant protein into inclusion bodies (IBs). However, recent advancement of biotechnology has shown substantial recovery of bioactive protein from such insoluble IBs by solubilization and refolding processes. In addition, gene fusion technology has also widely been used to improve the soluble protein production using E. coli. This study demonstrates that mild-solubilization and in vitro refolding strategies, both are capable to recover soluble scFv protein from bacterial IBs, although the degree of success is greatly influenced by different fusion tags with the target protein. RESULTS: It was observed that the most commonly used fusion tag, i.e., maltose binding protein (MBP) was not only influenced the cytoplasmic expression in E. coli but also greatly improved the in vitro refolding yield of scFv protein. On the other hand, mild solubilization process potentially could recover soluble and functional scFv protein from non-classical IBs without assistance of any fusion tag and in vitro refolding step. The recovery yield achieved by mild solubilization process was also found higher than denaturation–refolding method except while scFv was refolded in fusion with MBP tag. Concomitantly, it was also observed that the soluble protein achieved by mild solubilization process was better structured and functionally more active than the one achieved by in vitro refolding method in the absence of MBP tag or refolding enhancer. CONCLUSIONS: Maltose binding protein tagged scFv has shown better refolding and solubility yields as compare to mild solubilization process. However, in terms of cost, time and tag free nature, mild solubilization method for scFv recovery from bacterial IBs is considerable for therapeutic application and further structural studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12934-019-1053-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6330739/ /pubmed/30642336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1053-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sarker, Animesh
Rathore, Abhishek Singh
Gupta, Rinkoo Devi
Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process
title Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process
title_full Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process
title_fullStr Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process
title_short Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process
title_sort evaluation of scfv protein recovery from e. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1053-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sarkeranimesh evaluationofscfvproteinrecoveryfromecolibyinvitrorefoldingandmildsolubilizationprocess
AT rathoreabhisheksingh evaluationofscfvproteinrecoveryfromecolibyinvitrorefoldingandmildsolubilizationprocess
AT guptarinkoodevi evaluationofscfvproteinrecoveryfromecolibyinvitrorefoldingandmildsolubilizationprocess