Cargando…

Transcriptional silencing of 35S driven-transgene is differentially determined depending on promoter methylation heterogeneity at specific cytosines in both plus- and minus-sense strands

BACKGROUND: De novo DNA methylation triggered by short interfering RNAs is called RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). Transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) through RdDM can be induced using a viral vector. We have previously induced RdDM on the 35S promoter in the green fluorescent protein (GFP)-exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsunaga, Wataru, Shimura, Hanako, Shirakawa, Senri, Isoda, Reika, Inukai, Tsuyoshi, Matsumura, Takeshi, Masuta, Chikara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1628-y
_version_ 1783387395923640320
author Matsunaga, Wataru
Shimura, Hanako
Shirakawa, Senri
Isoda, Reika
Inukai, Tsuyoshi
Matsumura, Takeshi
Masuta, Chikara
author_facet Matsunaga, Wataru
Shimura, Hanako
Shirakawa, Senri
Isoda, Reika
Inukai, Tsuyoshi
Matsumura, Takeshi
Masuta, Chikara
author_sort Matsunaga, Wataru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: De novo DNA methylation triggered by short interfering RNAs is called RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). Transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) through RdDM can be induced using a viral vector. We have previously induced RdDM on the 35S promoter in the green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing Nicotiana benthamiana line 16c using the cucumber mosaic virus vector. The GFP fluorescence phenotype segregated into two types, “red” and “orange” in the first self-fertilized (S(1)) progeny plants by the difference in degree of recovery from TGS on GFP expression. In the second self-fertilized generation (S(2) plants), the phenotypes again segregated. Explaining what generates the red and orange types could answer a very important question in epigenetics: How is the robustness of TGS maintained after RdDM induction? RESULTS: In bisulfite sequencing analyses, we found a significant difference in the overall promoter hypermethylation pattern between the red and orange types in S(1) plants but little difference in S(2) plants. Therefore, we assumed that methylation at some specific cytosine residues might be important in determining the two phenotypes. To find the factor that discriminates stable, robust TGS from the unstable TGS with incomplete inheritance, we analyzed the direct effect of methylated cytosine residues on TGS. Because it has not yet been demonstrated that DNA methylation at a few specific cytosine residues on known sequence elements can indeed determine TGS robustness, we newly developed a method by which we can directly evaluate the effect of specific methylation on promoter activity. In this assay, we found that the effects of the specific cytosine methylation on TGS differed between the plus- and minus-strands. CONCLUSIONS: We found two distinct phenotypes, the stable and unstable TGS in the progenies of virus-induced TGS plants. Our bisulfite sequencing analyses suggested that methylation at some specific cytosine residues in the 35S promoter played a role in determining whether stable or unstable TGSs are induced. Using the developed method, we inferred that DNA methylation heterogeneity in and between the plus- and minus-strands can differentially determine TGS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-019-1628-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6332629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63326292019-01-16 Transcriptional silencing of 35S driven-transgene is differentially determined depending on promoter methylation heterogeneity at specific cytosines in both plus- and minus-sense strands Matsunaga, Wataru Shimura, Hanako Shirakawa, Senri Isoda, Reika Inukai, Tsuyoshi Matsumura, Takeshi Masuta, Chikara BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: De novo DNA methylation triggered by short interfering RNAs is called RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). Transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) through RdDM can be induced using a viral vector. We have previously induced RdDM on the 35S promoter in the green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing Nicotiana benthamiana line 16c using the cucumber mosaic virus vector. The GFP fluorescence phenotype segregated into two types, “red” and “orange” in the first self-fertilized (S(1)) progeny plants by the difference in degree of recovery from TGS on GFP expression. In the second self-fertilized generation (S(2) plants), the phenotypes again segregated. Explaining what generates the red and orange types could answer a very important question in epigenetics: How is the robustness of TGS maintained after RdDM induction? RESULTS: In bisulfite sequencing analyses, we found a significant difference in the overall promoter hypermethylation pattern between the red and orange types in S(1) plants but little difference in S(2) plants. Therefore, we assumed that methylation at some specific cytosine residues might be important in determining the two phenotypes. To find the factor that discriminates stable, robust TGS from the unstable TGS with incomplete inheritance, we analyzed the direct effect of methylated cytosine residues on TGS. Because it has not yet been demonstrated that DNA methylation at a few specific cytosine residues on known sequence elements can indeed determine TGS robustness, we newly developed a method by which we can directly evaluate the effect of specific methylation on promoter activity. In this assay, we found that the effects of the specific cytosine methylation on TGS differed between the plus- and minus-strands. CONCLUSIONS: We found two distinct phenotypes, the stable and unstable TGS in the progenies of virus-induced TGS plants. Our bisulfite sequencing analyses suggested that methylation at some specific cytosine residues in the 35S promoter played a role in determining whether stable or unstable TGSs are induced. Using the developed method, we inferred that DNA methylation heterogeneity in and between the plus- and minus-strands can differentially determine TGS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-019-1628-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6332629/ /pubmed/30642254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1628-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matsunaga, Wataru
Shimura, Hanako
Shirakawa, Senri
Isoda, Reika
Inukai, Tsuyoshi
Matsumura, Takeshi
Masuta, Chikara
Transcriptional silencing of 35S driven-transgene is differentially determined depending on promoter methylation heterogeneity at specific cytosines in both plus- and minus-sense strands
title Transcriptional silencing of 35S driven-transgene is differentially determined depending on promoter methylation heterogeneity at specific cytosines in both plus- and minus-sense strands
title_full Transcriptional silencing of 35S driven-transgene is differentially determined depending on promoter methylation heterogeneity at specific cytosines in both plus- and minus-sense strands
title_fullStr Transcriptional silencing of 35S driven-transgene is differentially determined depending on promoter methylation heterogeneity at specific cytosines in both plus- and minus-sense strands
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptional silencing of 35S driven-transgene is differentially determined depending on promoter methylation heterogeneity at specific cytosines in both plus- and minus-sense strands
title_short Transcriptional silencing of 35S driven-transgene is differentially determined depending on promoter methylation heterogeneity at specific cytosines in both plus- and minus-sense strands
title_sort transcriptional silencing of 35s driven-transgene is differentially determined depending on promoter methylation heterogeneity at specific cytosines in both plus- and minus-sense strands
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1628-y
work_keys_str_mv AT matsunagawataru transcriptionalsilencingof35sdriventransgeneisdifferentiallydetermineddependingonpromotermethylationheterogeneityatspecificcytosinesinbothplusandminussensestrands
AT shimurahanako transcriptionalsilencingof35sdriventransgeneisdifferentiallydetermineddependingonpromotermethylationheterogeneityatspecificcytosinesinbothplusandminussensestrands
AT shirakawasenri transcriptionalsilencingof35sdriventransgeneisdifferentiallydetermineddependingonpromotermethylationheterogeneityatspecificcytosinesinbothplusandminussensestrands
AT isodareika transcriptionalsilencingof35sdriventransgeneisdifferentiallydetermineddependingonpromotermethylationheterogeneityatspecificcytosinesinbothplusandminussensestrands
AT inukaitsuyoshi transcriptionalsilencingof35sdriventransgeneisdifferentiallydetermineddependingonpromotermethylationheterogeneityatspecificcytosinesinbothplusandminussensestrands
AT matsumuratakeshi transcriptionalsilencingof35sdriventransgeneisdifferentiallydetermineddependingonpromotermethylationheterogeneityatspecificcytosinesinbothplusandminussensestrands
AT masutachikara transcriptionalsilencingof35sdriventransgeneisdifferentiallydetermineddependingonpromotermethylationheterogeneityatspecificcytosinesinbothplusandminussensestrands