Cargando…

The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study

PURPOSE: We compared oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of ONU and LNU between 2000 and 2012 at five participating institutions were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae Heon, Hong, Bumsik, Seo, Ho Kyung, Kang, Seok Ho, Ku, Ja Hyeon, Jeong, Byong Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29690748
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.417
_version_ 1783387651990093824
author Kim, Tae Heon
Hong, Bumsik
Seo, Ho Kyung
Kang, Seok Ho
Ku, Ja Hyeon
Jeong, Byong Chang
author_facet Kim, Tae Heon
Hong, Bumsik
Seo, Ho Kyung
Kang, Seok Ho
Ku, Ja Hyeon
Jeong, Byong Chang
author_sort Kim, Tae Heon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We compared oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of ONU and LNU between 2000 and 2012 at five participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics and pathologic outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches. The influence of the type of surgical approach on intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Predictors of IVRFS, PFS, CSS, and OS were also analyzed with a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1,521 patients with UTUC were eligible for the present study (ONU, 906; LNU, 615). The estimated 5-year IVRFS (57.8 vs. 51.0%, p=0.010), CSS (80.4 vs. 76.4%, p=0.032), and OS (75.8 vs. 71.4%, p=0.026) rates were significantly different between the two groups in favor of LNU. Moreover, in patients with locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4), the LNU group showed better 5-year IVRFS (62.9 vs. 54.1%, p=0.038), CSS (64.3 vs. 56.9%, p=0.022), and OS (60.4 vs. 53.1%, p=0.018) rates than the ONU group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that type of surgical approach was independently associated with IVRFS, but was not related to PFS, CSS, and OS. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that LNU provided better oncologic control of IVRFS, CSS, and OS compared with ONU for the management of patients with UTUC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6333991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63339912019-01-22 The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study Kim, Tae Heon Hong, Bumsik Seo, Ho Kyung Kang, Seok Ho Ku, Ja Hyeon Jeong, Byong Chang Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: We compared oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of ONU and LNU between 2000 and 2012 at five participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics and pathologic outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches. The influence of the type of surgical approach on intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Predictors of IVRFS, PFS, CSS, and OS were also analyzed with a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1,521 patients with UTUC were eligible for the present study (ONU, 906; LNU, 615). The estimated 5-year IVRFS (57.8 vs. 51.0%, p=0.010), CSS (80.4 vs. 76.4%, p=0.032), and OS (75.8 vs. 71.4%, p=0.026) rates were significantly different between the two groups in favor of LNU. Moreover, in patients with locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4), the LNU group showed better 5-year IVRFS (62.9 vs. 54.1%, p=0.038), CSS (64.3 vs. 56.9%, p=0.022), and OS (60.4 vs. 53.1%, p=0.018) rates than the ONU group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that type of surgical approach was independently associated with IVRFS, but was not related to PFS, CSS, and OS. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that LNU provided better oncologic control of IVRFS, CSS, and OS compared with ONU for the management of patients with UTUC. Korean Cancer Association 2019-01 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6333991/ /pubmed/29690748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.417 Text en Copyright © 2019 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Tae Heon
Hong, Bumsik
Seo, Ho Kyung
Kang, Seok Ho
Ku, Ja Hyeon
Jeong, Byong Chang
The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study
title The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study
title_full The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study
title_fullStr The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study
title_short The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study
title_sort comparison of oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a korean multicenter collaborative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29690748
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.417
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaeheon thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT hongbumsik thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT seohokyung thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT kangseokho thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT kujahyeon thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT jeongbyongchang thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT kimtaeheon comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT hongbumsik comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT seohokyung comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT kangseokho comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT kujahyeon comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy
AT jeongbyongchang comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy