Cargando…
The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study
PURPOSE: We compared oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of ONU and LNU between 2000 and 2012 at five participating institutions were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Cancer Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29690748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.417 |
_version_ | 1783387651990093824 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Tae Heon Hong, Bumsik Seo, Ho Kyung Kang, Seok Ho Ku, Ja Hyeon Jeong, Byong Chang |
author_facet | Kim, Tae Heon Hong, Bumsik Seo, Ho Kyung Kang, Seok Ho Ku, Ja Hyeon Jeong, Byong Chang |
author_sort | Kim, Tae Heon |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We compared oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of ONU and LNU between 2000 and 2012 at five participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics and pathologic outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches. The influence of the type of surgical approach on intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Predictors of IVRFS, PFS, CSS, and OS were also analyzed with a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1,521 patients with UTUC were eligible for the present study (ONU, 906; LNU, 615). The estimated 5-year IVRFS (57.8 vs. 51.0%, p=0.010), CSS (80.4 vs. 76.4%, p=0.032), and OS (75.8 vs. 71.4%, p=0.026) rates were significantly different between the two groups in favor of LNU. Moreover, in patients with locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4), the LNU group showed better 5-year IVRFS (62.9 vs. 54.1%, p=0.038), CSS (64.3 vs. 56.9%, p=0.022), and OS (60.4 vs. 53.1%, p=0.018) rates than the ONU group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that type of surgical approach was independently associated with IVRFS, but was not related to PFS, CSS, and OS. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that LNU provided better oncologic control of IVRFS, CSS, and OS compared with ONU for the management of patients with UTUC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6333991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Cancer Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63339912019-01-22 The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study Kim, Tae Heon Hong, Bumsik Seo, Ho Kyung Kang, Seok Ho Ku, Ja Hyeon Jeong, Byong Chang Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: We compared oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of ONU and LNU between 2000 and 2012 at five participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics and pathologic outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches. The influence of the type of surgical approach on intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Predictors of IVRFS, PFS, CSS, and OS were also analyzed with a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1,521 patients with UTUC were eligible for the present study (ONU, 906; LNU, 615). The estimated 5-year IVRFS (57.8 vs. 51.0%, p=0.010), CSS (80.4 vs. 76.4%, p=0.032), and OS (75.8 vs. 71.4%, p=0.026) rates were significantly different between the two groups in favor of LNU. Moreover, in patients with locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4), the LNU group showed better 5-year IVRFS (62.9 vs. 54.1%, p=0.038), CSS (64.3 vs. 56.9%, p=0.022), and OS (60.4 vs. 53.1%, p=0.018) rates than the ONU group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that type of surgical approach was independently associated with IVRFS, but was not related to PFS, CSS, and OS. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that LNU provided better oncologic control of IVRFS, CSS, and OS compared with ONU for the management of patients with UTUC. Korean Cancer Association 2019-01 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6333991/ /pubmed/29690748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.417 Text en Copyright © 2019 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Tae Heon Hong, Bumsik Seo, Ho Kyung Kang, Seok Ho Ku, Ja Hyeon Jeong, Byong Chang The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study |
title | The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study |
title_full | The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study |
title_fullStr | The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study |
title_short | The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study |
title_sort | comparison of oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a korean multicenter collaborative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29690748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimtaeheon thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT hongbumsik thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT seohokyung thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT kangseokho thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT kujahyeon thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT jeongbyongchang thecomparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT kimtaeheon comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT hongbumsik comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT seohokyung comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT kangseokho comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT kujahyeon comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy AT jeongbyongchang comparisonofoncologicoutcomesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicradicalnephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaakoreanmulticentercollaborativestudy |