Cargando…

Impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology

INTRODUCTION: Providing feedback to students is an essential component in medical education and has been shown to improve the students’ learning. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of computer-based immediate feedback on the medical students’ learning in a pharmacology course. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BADYAL, DINESH K, BALA, SUMAN, SINGH, TEJINDER, GULREZ, GAURAV
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697542
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/JAMP.2019.41036
_version_ 1783388950456434688
author BADYAL, DINESH K
BALA, SUMAN
SINGH, TEJINDER
GULREZ, GAURAV
author_facet BADYAL, DINESH K
BALA, SUMAN
SINGH, TEJINDER
GULREZ, GAURAV
author_sort BADYAL, DINESH K
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Providing feedback to students is an essential component in medical education and has been shown to improve the students’ learning. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of computer-based immediate feedback on the medical students’ learning in a pharmacology course. METHODS: In this prospective intervention study some feedback modules in pharmacology (FMP) were prepared in two topics: the cardiovascular system (CVS) and chemotherapy, using blank templates on “Hot Potatoes” software. The FMP included MC-based questions and two versions were developed: one with feedback (FMP-1) and the other without feedback (FMP-2). The FMP-1 module provided immediate feedback for each option the student chose. The students (n=48) were randomized by computer generated random number table to two groups A and B to receive the module in CVS, i.e., FMP-1 and FMP-2, respectively. A cross-over design was adopted to expose all students to immediate feedback modules. The test scores were compared and feedback was obtained from students and faculty using a validated questionnaire. A focus group discussion was conducted to clarify the issues raised by the students. RESULTS: The module with immediate feedback was much better appreciated by the students than the module without feedback. The students spent more time on FMP-1 (42±7.00 minutes vs 27±12.36 minutes; p<0.001 in chemotherapy and 40±12.11 minutes vs 24±6.01 minutes; p<0.001 in CVS). However, there was no statistically significant difference in mean test scores. The qualitative data collected provided important information on the value of immediate feedback. The students believed that immediate feedback was an excellent way for self-assessment and improved their deeper understanding of content areas. They also felt that it supplemented their traditional learning habits and stimulated them to read more. The students enjoyed its non-threatening nature. CONCLUSION: Immediate feedback improved the deeper understanding of pharmacology and its relevance to medicine for the two topics although immediate feedback did not improve test scores. Overall, immediate feedback had a positive impact on the students’ self-directed learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6341457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63414572019-01-29 Impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology BADYAL, DINESH K BALA, SUMAN SINGH, TEJINDER GULREZ, GAURAV J Adv Med Educ Prof Original Article INTRODUCTION: Providing feedback to students is an essential component in medical education and has been shown to improve the students’ learning. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of computer-based immediate feedback on the medical students’ learning in a pharmacology course. METHODS: In this prospective intervention study some feedback modules in pharmacology (FMP) were prepared in two topics: the cardiovascular system (CVS) and chemotherapy, using blank templates on “Hot Potatoes” software. The FMP included MC-based questions and two versions were developed: one with feedback (FMP-1) and the other without feedback (FMP-2). The FMP-1 module provided immediate feedback for each option the student chose. The students (n=48) were randomized by computer generated random number table to two groups A and B to receive the module in CVS, i.e., FMP-1 and FMP-2, respectively. A cross-over design was adopted to expose all students to immediate feedback modules. The test scores were compared and feedback was obtained from students and faculty using a validated questionnaire. A focus group discussion was conducted to clarify the issues raised by the students. RESULTS: The module with immediate feedback was much better appreciated by the students than the module without feedback. The students spent more time on FMP-1 (42±7.00 minutes vs 27±12.36 minutes; p<0.001 in chemotherapy and 40±12.11 minutes vs 24±6.01 minutes; p<0.001 in CVS). However, there was no statistically significant difference in mean test scores. The qualitative data collected provided important information on the value of immediate feedback. The students believed that immediate feedback was an excellent way for self-assessment and improved their deeper understanding of content areas. They also felt that it supplemented their traditional learning habits and stimulated them to read more. The students enjoyed its non-threatening nature. CONCLUSION: Immediate feedback improved the deeper understanding of pharmacology and its relevance to medicine for the two topics although immediate feedback did not improve test scores. Overall, immediate feedback had a positive impact on the students’ self-directed learning. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6341457/ /pubmed/30697542 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/JAMP.2019.41036 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
BADYAL, DINESH K
BALA, SUMAN
SINGH, TEJINDER
GULREZ, GAURAV
Impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology
title Impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology
title_full Impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology
title_fullStr Impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology
title_full_unstemmed Impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology
title_short Impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology
title_sort impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697542
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/JAMP.2019.41036
work_keys_str_mv AT badyaldineshk impactofimmediatefeedbackonthelearningofmedicalstudentsinpharmacology
AT balasuman impactofimmediatefeedbackonthelearningofmedicalstudentsinpharmacology
AT singhtejinder impactofimmediatefeedbackonthelearningofmedicalstudentsinpharmacology
AT gulrezgaurav impactofimmediatefeedbackonthelearningofmedicalstudentsinpharmacology