Cargando…
Re-formulating Gehan’s design as a flexible two-stage single-arm trial
BACKGROUND: Gehan’s two-stage design was historically the design of choice for phase II oncology trials. One of the reasons it is less frequently used today is that it does not allow for a formal test of treatment efficacy, and therefore does not control conventional type-I and type-II error-rates....
Autores principales: | Grayling, Michael J., Mander, Adrian P. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0659-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Two-Stage Single-Arm Trials Are Rarely Analyzed Effectively or Reported Adequately
por: Grayling, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
An optimised multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial design for unknown variance
por: Grayling, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A stochastically curtailed single-arm phase II trial design for binary outcomes
por: Law, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A stochastically curtailed two-arm randomised phase II trial design for binary outcomes
por: Law, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Do single‐arm trials have a role in drug development plans incorporating randomised trials?
por: Grayling, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)