Cargando…
In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition
Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6351554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1 |
_version_ | 1783390596766892032 |
---|---|
author | Maheshwari, Vaibhav Thijssen, Stephan Tao, Xia Fuertinger, Doris H. Kappel, Franz Kotanko, Peter |
author_facet | Maheshwari, Vaibhav Thijssen, Stephan Tao, Xia Fuertinger, Doris H. Kappel, Franz Kotanko, Peter |
author_sort | Maheshwari, Vaibhav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor pre-dialyzer, which competes with PBUTs for their albumin binding sites and increases their free fraction. We used a mathematical model of PBUT/displacer kinetics in dialysis comprising a three-compartment patient model, an arterial/venous tube segment model, and a dialyzer model. Compared to HD, improvements in removal of prototypical PBUTs indoxyl sulfate (initial concentration 100 µM, 7% free) and p-cresyl sulfate (150 µM, 5% free) were: 5.5% and 6.4%, respectively, for pre-dilution HDF with 20 L replacement fluid; 8.1% and 9.1% for post-dilution HDF 20 L; 15.6% and 18.3% for pre-dilution HDF 60 L; 19.4% and 22.2% for complete membrane adsorption; 35.0% and 41.9% for displacement with tryptophan (2000 mg in 500 mL saline); 26.7% and 32.4% for displacement with ibuprofen (800 mg in 200 mL saline). Prolonged (one-month) use of tryptophan reduces the IS and pCS time-averaged concentration by 28.1% and 29.9%, respectively, compared to conventional HD. We conclude that competitive binding can be a pragmatic approach for improving PBUT removal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6351554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63515542019-01-30 In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition Maheshwari, Vaibhav Thijssen, Stephan Tao, Xia Fuertinger, Doris H. Kappel, Franz Kotanko, Peter Sci Rep Article Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor pre-dialyzer, which competes with PBUTs for their albumin binding sites and increases their free fraction. We used a mathematical model of PBUT/displacer kinetics in dialysis comprising a three-compartment patient model, an arterial/venous tube segment model, and a dialyzer model. Compared to HD, improvements in removal of prototypical PBUTs indoxyl sulfate (initial concentration 100 µM, 7% free) and p-cresyl sulfate (150 µM, 5% free) were: 5.5% and 6.4%, respectively, for pre-dilution HDF with 20 L replacement fluid; 8.1% and 9.1% for post-dilution HDF 20 L; 15.6% and 18.3% for pre-dilution HDF 60 L; 19.4% and 22.2% for complete membrane adsorption; 35.0% and 41.9% for displacement with tryptophan (2000 mg in 500 mL saline); 26.7% and 32.4% for displacement with ibuprofen (800 mg in 200 mL saline). Prolonged (one-month) use of tryptophan reduces the IS and pCS time-averaged concentration by 28.1% and 29.9%, respectively, compared to conventional HD. We conclude that competitive binding can be a pragmatic approach for improving PBUT removal. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6351554/ /pubmed/30696874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Maheshwari, Vaibhav Thijssen, Stephan Tao, Xia Fuertinger, Doris H. Kappel, Franz Kotanko, Peter In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition |
title | In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition |
title_full | In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition |
title_fullStr | In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition |
title_full_unstemmed | In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition |
title_short | In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition |
title_sort | in silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6351554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maheshwarivaibhav insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition AT thijssenstephan insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition AT taoxia insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition AT fuertingerdorish insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition AT kappelfranz insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition AT kotankopeter insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition |