Cargando…

In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition

Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maheshwari, Vaibhav, Thijssen, Stephan, Tao, Xia, Fuertinger, Doris H., Kappel, Franz, Kotanko, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6351554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1
_version_ 1783390596766892032
author Maheshwari, Vaibhav
Thijssen, Stephan
Tao, Xia
Fuertinger, Doris H.
Kappel, Franz
Kotanko, Peter
author_facet Maheshwari, Vaibhav
Thijssen, Stephan
Tao, Xia
Fuertinger, Doris H.
Kappel, Franz
Kotanko, Peter
author_sort Maheshwari, Vaibhav
collection PubMed
description Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor pre-dialyzer, which competes with PBUTs for their albumin binding sites and increases their free fraction. We used a mathematical model of PBUT/displacer kinetics in dialysis comprising a three-compartment patient model, an arterial/venous tube segment model, and a dialyzer model. Compared to HD, improvements in removal of prototypical PBUTs indoxyl sulfate (initial concentration 100 µM, 7% free) and p-cresyl sulfate (150 µM, 5% free) were: 5.5% and 6.4%, respectively, for pre-dilution HDF with 20 L replacement fluid; 8.1% and 9.1% for post-dilution HDF 20 L; 15.6% and 18.3% for pre-dilution HDF 60 L; 19.4% and 22.2% for complete membrane adsorption; 35.0% and 41.9% for displacement with tryptophan (2000 mg in 500 mL saline); 26.7% and 32.4% for displacement with ibuprofen (800 mg in 200 mL saline). Prolonged (one-month) use of tryptophan reduces the IS and pCS time-averaged concentration by 28.1% and 29.9%, respectively, compared to conventional HD. We conclude that competitive binding can be a pragmatic approach for improving PBUT removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6351554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63515542019-01-30 In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition Maheshwari, Vaibhav Thijssen, Stephan Tao, Xia Fuertinger, Doris H. Kappel, Franz Kotanko, Peter Sci Rep Article Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor pre-dialyzer, which competes with PBUTs for their albumin binding sites and increases their free fraction. We used a mathematical model of PBUT/displacer kinetics in dialysis comprising a three-compartment patient model, an arterial/venous tube segment model, and a dialyzer model. Compared to HD, improvements in removal of prototypical PBUTs indoxyl sulfate (initial concentration 100 µM, 7% free) and p-cresyl sulfate (150 µM, 5% free) were: 5.5% and 6.4%, respectively, for pre-dilution HDF with 20 L replacement fluid; 8.1% and 9.1% for post-dilution HDF 20 L; 15.6% and 18.3% for pre-dilution HDF 60 L; 19.4% and 22.2% for complete membrane adsorption; 35.0% and 41.9% for displacement with tryptophan (2000 mg in 500 mL saline); 26.7% and 32.4% for displacement with ibuprofen (800 mg in 200 mL saline). Prolonged (one-month) use of tryptophan reduces the IS and pCS time-averaged concentration by 28.1% and 29.9%, respectively, compared to conventional HD. We conclude that competitive binding can be a pragmatic approach for improving PBUT removal. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6351554/ /pubmed/30696874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Maheshwari, Vaibhav
Thijssen, Stephan
Tao, Xia
Fuertinger, Doris H.
Kappel, Franz
Kotanko, Peter
In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition
title In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition
title_full In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition
title_fullStr In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition
title_full_unstemmed In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition
title_short In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition
title_sort in silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6351554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1
work_keys_str_mv AT maheshwarivaibhav insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition
AT thijssenstephan insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition
AT taoxia insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition
AT fuertingerdorish insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition
AT kappelfranz insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition
AT kotankopeter insilicocomparisonofproteinbounduremictoxinremovalbyhemodialysishemodiafiltrationmembraneadsorptionandbindingcompetition