Cargando…

The Opposing Contribution of SMS1 and SMS2 to Glioma Progression and Their Value in the Therapeutic Response to 2OHOA

Background: 2-Hydroxyoleic acid (2OHOA) is particularly active against glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and successfully finished a phase I/IIA trial in patients with glioma and other advanced solid tumors. However, its mechanism of action is not fully known. Methods: The relationship between SMS1 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández-García, Paula, Rosselló, Catalina A., Rodríguez-Lorca, Raquel, Beteta-Göbel, Roberto, Fernández-Díaz, Javier, Lladó, Victoria, Busquets, Xavier, Escribá, Pablo V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646599
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11010088
_version_ 1783391512581636096
author Fernández-García, Paula
Rosselló, Catalina A.
Rodríguez-Lorca, Raquel
Beteta-Göbel, Roberto
Fernández-Díaz, Javier
Lladó, Victoria
Busquets, Xavier
Escribá, Pablo V.
author_facet Fernández-García, Paula
Rosselló, Catalina A.
Rodríguez-Lorca, Raquel
Beteta-Göbel, Roberto
Fernández-Díaz, Javier
Lladó, Victoria
Busquets, Xavier
Escribá, Pablo V.
author_sort Fernández-García, Paula
collection PubMed
description Background: 2-Hydroxyoleic acid (2OHOA) is particularly active against glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and successfully finished a phase I/IIA trial in patients with glioma and other advanced solid tumors. However, its mechanism of action is not fully known. Methods: The relationship between SMS1 and SMS2 expressions (mRNA) and overall survival in 329 glioma patients was investigated, and so was the correlation between SMS expression and 2OHOA’s efficacy. The opposing role of SMS isoforms in 2OHOA’s mechanism of action and in GBM cell growth, differentiation and death, was studied overexpressing or silencing them in human GBM cells. Results: Patients with high-SMS1 plus low-SMS2 expression had a 5-year survival ~10-fold higher than patients with low-SMS1 plus high-SMS2 expression. SMS1 and SMS2 also had opposing effect on GBM cell survival and 2OHOA’s IC(50) correlated with basal SMS1 levels and treatment induced changes in SMS1/SMS2 ratio. SMSs expression disparately affected 2OHOA’s cancer cell proliferation, differentiation, ER-stress and autophagy. Conclusions: SMS1 and SMS2 showed opposite associations with glioma patient survival, glioma cell growth and response to 2OHOA treatment. SMSs signature could constitute a valuable prognostic biomarker, with high SMS1 and low SMS2 being a better disease prognosis. Additionally, low basal SMS1 mRNA levels predict positive response to 2OHOA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6356341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63563412019-02-05 The Opposing Contribution of SMS1 and SMS2 to Glioma Progression and Their Value in the Therapeutic Response to 2OHOA Fernández-García, Paula Rosselló, Catalina A. Rodríguez-Lorca, Raquel Beteta-Göbel, Roberto Fernández-Díaz, Javier Lladó, Victoria Busquets, Xavier Escribá, Pablo V. Cancers (Basel) Article Background: 2-Hydroxyoleic acid (2OHOA) is particularly active against glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and successfully finished a phase I/IIA trial in patients with glioma and other advanced solid tumors. However, its mechanism of action is not fully known. Methods: The relationship between SMS1 and SMS2 expressions (mRNA) and overall survival in 329 glioma patients was investigated, and so was the correlation between SMS expression and 2OHOA’s efficacy. The opposing role of SMS isoforms in 2OHOA’s mechanism of action and in GBM cell growth, differentiation and death, was studied overexpressing or silencing them in human GBM cells. Results: Patients with high-SMS1 plus low-SMS2 expression had a 5-year survival ~10-fold higher than patients with low-SMS1 plus high-SMS2 expression. SMS1 and SMS2 also had opposing effect on GBM cell survival and 2OHOA’s IC(50) correlated with basal SMS1 levels and treatment induced changes in SMS1/SMS2 ratio. SMSs expression disparately affected 2OHOA’s cancer cell proliferation, differentiation, ER-stress and autophagy. Conclusions: SMS1 and SMS2 showed opposite associations with glioma patient survival, glioma cell growth and response to 2OHOA treatment. SMSs signature could constitute a valuable prognostic biomarker, with high SMS1 and low SMS2 being a better disease prognosis. Additionally, low basal SMS1 mRNA levels predict positive response to 2OHOA. MDPI 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6356341/ /pubmed/30646599 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11010088 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fernández-García, Paula
Rosselló, Catalina A.
Rodríguez-Lorca, Raquel
Beteta-Göbel, Roberto
Fernández-Díaz, Javier
Lladó, Victoria
Busquets, Xavier
Escribá, Pablo V.
The Opposing Contribution of SMS1 and SMS2 to Glioma Progression and Their Value in the Therapeutic Response to 2OHOA
title The Opposing Contribution of SMS1 and SMS2 to Glioma Progression and Their Value in the Therapeutic Response to 2OHOA
title_full The Opposing Contribution of SMS1 and SMS2 to Glioma Progression and Their Value in the Therapeutic Response to 2OHOA
title_fullStr The Opposing Contribution of SMS1 and SMS2 to Glioma Progression and Their Value in the Therapeutic Response to 2OHOA
title_full_unstemmed The Opposing Contribution of SMS1 and SMS2 to Glioma Progression and Their Value in the Therapeutic Response to 2OHOA
title_short The Opposing Contribution of SMS1 and SMS2 to Glioma Progression and Their Value in the Therapeutic Response to 2OHOA
title_sort opposing contribution of sms1 and sms2 to glioma progression and their value in the therapeutic response to 2ohoa
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6356341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646599
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11010088
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezgarciapaula theopposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT rossellocatalinaa theopposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT rodriguezlorcaraquel theopposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT betetagobelroberto theopposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT fernandezdiazjavier theopposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT lladovictoria theopposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT busquetsxavier theopposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT escribapablov theopposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT fernandezgarciapaula opposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT rossellocatalinaa opposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT rodriguezlorcaraquel opposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT betetagobelroberto opposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT fernandezdiazjavier opposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT lladovictoria opposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT busquetsxavier opposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa
AT escribapablov opposingcontributionofsms1andsms2togliomaprogressionandtheirvalueinthetherapeuticresponseto2ohoa