Cargando…

Feasibility and Health Effects of a 15-Week Combined Exercise Programme for Sedentary Elderly: A Randomised Controlled Trial

There is strong evidence that considerable health benefits can be achieved even with small amounts of physical activity. However, getting people to exercise regularly is a major challenge not least in the elderly population. This study investigated the feasibility and physiological health effects of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Tina-Thea, Møller, Trine K., Andersen, Lars L., Zebis, Mette K., Hansen, Peter R., Krustrup, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3081029
_version_ 1783393203329695744
author Nielsen, Tina-Thea
Møller, Trine K.
Andersen, Lars L.
Zebis, Mette K.
Hansen, Peter R.
Krustrup, Peter
author_facet Nielsen, Tina-Thea
Møller, Trine K.
Andersen, Lars L.
Zebis, Mette K.
Hansen, Peter R.
Krustrup, Peter
author_sort Nielsen, Tina-Thea
collection PubMed
description There is strong evidence that considerable health benefits can be achieved even with small amounts of physical activity. However, getting people to exercise regularly is a major challenge not least in the elderly population. This study investigated the feasibility and physiological health effects of a pragmatic 15-week exercise programme for sedentary elderly. In a single-blind randomised controlled trial, 45 sedentary 60-83-year-olds (25 women, 20 men) were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to a training group (TG, n=30) or a control group (CG, n=15). The training in TG consisted of a combination of exercise modalities (i.e., strength, aerobic fitness, stability, and flexibility training) performed once a week as supervised group-based training and a weekly home-based training for 15 weeks. Feasibility outcomes were exercise intensity, adherence, and adverse events. The primary outcome was change in aerobic fitness (VO(2max)/kg). Adherence was high (81%) for the supervised exercise and low (0%) for the home-based exercise. No acute injuries occurred in TG, but 4 subjects (13%) reported considerable joint pain related to training. Average heart rate (HR) during the supervised training was 104±12 beats/min (69.3±8.0%HR(max)), with 3.9±7.3% of training time >90%HR(max). Intention-to-treat analyses revealed no between-group differences for aerobic fitness (P=0.790) or any secondary cardiovascular outcomes at 15-week follow-up (resting HR or blood pressure; P>0.05). Compared to CG, bodyweight (-2.3 kg, 95% CI -4.0 to -7.0; P=0.006), total fat mass (-2.0 kg, 95% CI -3.5 to -0.5; P=0.01), and total fat percentage (-1.6%, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.3; P=0.01) decreased in TG. The group-based supervised training had high adherence and moderate exercise intensity, whereas the home-based training was not feasible in this study population. This exercise programme performed once a week did not improve aerobic fitness. Thus, supervised training with more vigorous intensity control appears advisable. Clinical Study registration number is H-15016951.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6364114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63641142019-02-26 Feasibility and Health Effects of a 15-Week Combined Exercise Programme for Sedentary Elderly: A Randomised Controlled Trial Nielsen, Tina-Thea Møller, Trine K. Andersen, Lars L. Zebis, Mette K. Hansen, Peter R. Krustrup, Peter Biomed Res Int Research Article There is strong evidence that considerable health benefits can be achieved even with small amounts of physical activity. However, getting people to exercise regularly is a major challenge not least in the elderly population. This study investigated the feasibility and physiological health effects of a pragmatic 15-week exercise programme for sedentary elderly. In a single-blind randomised controlled trial, 45 sedentary 60-83-year-olds (25 women, 20 men) were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to a training group (TG, n=30) or a control group (CG, n=15). The training in TG consisted of a combination of exercise modalities (i.e., strength, aerobic fitness, stability, and flexibility training) performed once a week as supervised group-based training and a weekly home-based training for 15 weeks. Feasibility outcomes were exercise intensity, adherence, and adverse events. The primary outcome was change in aerobic fitness (VO(2max)/kg). Adherence was high (81%) for the supervised exercise and low (0%) for the home-based exercise. No acute injuries occurred in TG, but 4 subjects (13%) reported considerable joint pain related to training. Average heart rate (HR) during the supervised training was 104±12 beats/min (69.3±8.0%HR(max)), with 3.9±7.3% of training time >90%HR(max). Intention-to-treat analyses revealed no between-group differences for aerobic fitness (P=0.790) or any secondary cardiovascular outcomes at 15-week follow-up (resting HR or blood pressure; P>0.05). Compared to CG, bodyweight (-2.3 kg, 95% CI -4.0 to -7.0; P=0.006), total fat mass (-2.0 kg, 95% CI -3.5 to -0.5; P=0.01), and total fat percentage (-1.6%, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.3; P=0.01) decreased in TG. The group-based supervised training had high adherence and moderate exercise intensity, whereas the home-based training was not feasible in this study population. This exercise programme performed once a week did not improve aerobic fitness. Thus, supervised training with more vigorous intensity control appears advisable. Clinical Study registration number is H-15016951. Hindawi 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6364114/ /pubmed/30809536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3081029 Text en Copyright © 2019 Tina-Thea Nielsen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nielsen, Tina-Thea
Møller, Trine K.
Andersen, Lars L.
Zebis, Mette K.
Hansen, Peter R.
Krustrup, Peter
Feasibility and Health Effects of a 15-Week Combined Exercise Programme for Sedentary Elderly: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title Feasibility and Health Effects of a 15-Week Combined Exercise Programme for Sedentary Elderly: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Feasibility and Health Effects of a 15-Week Combined Exercise Programme for Sedentary Elderly: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Feasibility and Health Effects of a 15-Week Combined Exercise Programme for Sedentary Elderly: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Health Effects of a 15-Week Combined Exercise Programme for Sedentary Elderly: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Feasibility and Health Effects of a 15-Week Combined Exercise Programme for Sedentary Elderly: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort feasibility and health effects of a 15-week combined exercise programme for sedentary elderly: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3081029
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsentinathea feasibilityandhealtheffectsofa15weekcombinedexerciseprogrammeforsedentaryelderlyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT møllertrinek feasibilityandhealtheffectsofa15weekcombinedexerciseprogrammeforsedentaryelderlyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT andersenlarsl feasibilityandhealtheffectsofa15weekcombinedexerciseprogrammeforsedentaryelderlyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zebismettek feasibilityandhealtheffectsofa15weekcombinedexerciseprogrammeforsedentaryelderlyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hansenpeterr feasibilityandhealtheffectsofa15weekcombinedexerciseprogrammeforsedentaryelderlyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT krustruppeter feasibilityandhealtheffectsofa15weekcombinedexerciseprogrammeforsedentaryelderlyarandomisedcontrolledtrial