Cargando…

Self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: a non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning

BACKGROUND: There is a concern that traditional instruction based methods of learning do not adequately prepare students for the challenges of physical therapy practice. Self-directed learning is considered to be the most appropriate educational approach to enhance life-long learning as it enhances...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Lankveld, Wim, Maas, Marjo, van Wijchen, Joost, Visser, Volcmar, Staal, J. Bart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1484-3
_version_ 1783394036936081408
author van Lankveld, Wim
Maas, Marjo
van Wijchen, Joost
Visser, Volcmar
Staal, J. Bart
author_facet van Lankveld, Wim
Maas, Marjo
van Wijchen, Joost
Visser, Volcmar
Staal, J. Bart
author_sort van Lankveld, Wim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a concern that traditional instruction based methods of learning do not adequately prepare students for the challenges of physical therapy practice. Self-directed learning is considered to be the most appropriate educational approach to enhance life-long learning as it enhances self-efficacy. This study compares outcomes in two educational approaches: self-directed learning (SDL), and traditional instruction based learning (IBL). METHODS: In this non-randomized experimental study two groups of second year physiotherapy students were compared using pre-post-test assessments. Study results (both knowledge and physiotherapy performance), and self-reported self-efficacy were used as outcome variables. Study results from the end of year 1 and the end of year two were retrieved form the student information system. Self-reported variables including general and physical therapy self-efficacy were assessed using an online questionnaire which was completed at the start and the end of year two. Changes in self-efficacy were analysed using a repeated measures multivariate ANOVA. RESULTS: A total of 174 students were enrolled in the second year, of which 108 (62%) agreed to participate in the online questionnaire. The online questionnaire at baseline (September 2015) was completed by 27 students in the SDL condition compared to 81 students in the IBL condition. There were no statistical differences at baseline between both educational approaches on any of the variables in the study. At the end of year two, there was no difference between both conditions in indicators of study results: knowledge and performance. Perceived self-efficacy in functioning as a physical therapist increased between both assessments. However, this increase was observed in both condition, and the difference between both conditions was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Self-directed learning and traditional instruction based learning result in equal study outcome and self-efficacy at the end of year two. More research is needed to determine the long term outcome that is most relevant for lifelong learning, and which students will benefit most from this approach. Nonetheless, self-directed learning might be an important alternative for instruction-based l education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6368688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63686882019-02-15 Self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: a non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning van Lankveld, Wim Maas, Marjo van Wijchen, Joost Visser, Volcmar Staal, J. Bart BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a concern that traditional instruction based methods of learning do not adequately prepare students for the challenges of physical therapy practice. Self-directed learning is considered to be the most appropriate educational approach to enhance life-long learning as it enhances self-efficacy. This study compares outcomes in two educational approaches: self-directed learning (SDL), and traditional instruction based learning (IBL). METHODS: In this non-randomized experimental study two groups of second year physiotherapy students were compared using pre-post-test assessments. Study results (both knowledge and physiotherapy performance), and self-reported self-efficacy were used as outcome variables. Study results from the end of year 1 and the end of year two were retrieved form the student information system. Self-reported variables including general and physical therapy self-efficacy were assessed using an online questionnaire which was completed at the start and the end of year two. Changes in self-efficacy were analysed using a repeated measures multivariate ANOVA. RESULTS: A total of 174 students were enrolled in the second year, of which 108 (62%) agreed to participate in the online questionnaire. The online questionnaire at baseline (September 2015) was completed by 27 students in the SDL condition compared to 81 students in the IBL condition. There were no statistical differences at baseline between both educational approaches on any of the variables in the study. At the end of year two, there was no difference between both conditions in indicators of study results: knowledge and performance. Perceived self-efficacy in functioning as a physical therapist increased between both assessments. However, this increase was observed in both condition, and the difference between both conditions was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Self-directed learning and traditional instruction based learning result in equal study outcome and self-efficacy at the end of year two. More research is needed to determine the long term outcome that is most relevant for lifelong learning, and which students will benefit most from this approach. Nonetheless, self-directed learning might be an important alternative for instruction-based l education. BioMed Central 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6368688/ /pubmed/30736785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1484-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Lankveld, Wim
Maas, Marjo
van Wijchen, Joost
Visser, Volcmar
Staal, J. Bart
Self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: a non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning
title Self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: a non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning
title_full Self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: a non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning
title_fullStr Self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: a non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning
title_full_unstemmed Self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: a non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning
title_short Self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: a non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning
title_sort self-regulated learning in physical therapy education: a non-randomized experimental study comparing self-directed and instruction-based learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1484-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vanlankveldwim selfregulatedlearninginphysicaltherapyeducationanonrandomizedexperimentalstudycomparingselfdirectedandinstructionbasedlearning
AT maasmarjo selfregulatedlearninginphysicaltherapyeducationanonrandomizedexperimentalstudycomparingselfdirectedandinstructionbasedlearning
AT vanwijchenjoost selfregulatedlearninginphysicaltherapyeducationanonrandomizedexperimentalstudycomparingselfdirectedandinstructionbasedlearning
AT visservolcmar selfregulatedlearninginphysicaltherapyeducationanonrandomizedexperimentalstudycomparingselfdirectedandinstructionbasedlearning
AT staaljbart selfregulatedlearninginphysicaltherapyeducationanonrandomizedexperimentalstudycomparingselfdirectedandinstructionbasedlearning