Cargando…

Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators

BACKGROUND: Feedback is regarded a key element in teaching communication skills. However, specific aspects of feedback have not been systematically investigated in this context. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of communication skills training (CST) integrating s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Engerer, Cosima, Berberat, Pascal O., Dinkel, Andreas, Rudolph, Bärbel, Sattel, Heribert, Wuensch, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1470-9
_version_ 1783394066513264640
author Engerer, Cosima
Berberat, Pascal O.
Dinkel, Andreas
Rudolph, Bärbel
Sattel, Heribert
Wuensch, Alexander
author_facet Engerer, Cosima
Berberat, Pascal O.
Dinkel, Andreas
Rudolph, Bärbel
Sattel, Heribert
Wuensch, Alexander
author_sort Engerer, Cosima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feedback is regarded a key element in teaching communication skills. However, specific aspects of feedback have not been systematically investigated in this context. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of communication skills training (CST) integrating specific, structured and behavioral feedback. METHODS: We condensed best practice recommendations for feedback in a CST for undergraduate medical students and compared the effect of specific, structured and behavior-orientated feedback (intervention group CST-behav) to general, experience-orientated feedback (CST- exp. as our control group) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We investigated changes on communication skills evaluated by independent raters, and evaluated by standardized patients (SP). To do that, every student was video-recorded in a pre and post assessment. RESULTS: Sixty-six undergraduate medical students participated voluntarily in our study. Randomization did not result in equally skilled groups at baseline, so valid inter-group comparisons were not possible. Therefore, we analyzed the results of 34 students of our intervention group (CST-behav). Five out of seven domains in communication skills as evaluated by independent raters improved significantly, and there was a significant change in the global evaluation by SP. CONCLUSIONS: Although we were unable to make between-group comparisons, the results of the within group pre-post evaluation suggest that specific feedback helps improve communication skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6368801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63688012019-02-15 Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators Engerer, Cosima Berberat, Pascal O. Dinkel, Andreas Rudolph, Bärbel Sattel, Heribert Wuensch, Alexander BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Feedback is regarded a key element in teaching communication skills. However, specific aspects of feedback have not been systematically investigated in this context. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of communication skills training (CST) integrating specific, structured and behavioral feedback. METHODS: We condensed best practice recommendations for feedback in a CST for undergraduate medical students and compared the effect of specific, structured and behavior-orientated feedback (intervention group CST-behav) to general, experience-orientated feedback (CST- exp. as our control group) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We investigated changes on communication skills evaluated by independent raters, and evaluated by standardized patients (SP). To do that, every student was video-recorded in a pre and post assessment. RESULTS: Sixty-six undergraduate medical students participated voluntarily in our study. Randomization did not result in equally skilled groups at baseline, so valid inter-group comparisons were not possible. Therefore, we analyzed the results of 34 students of our intervention group (CST-behav). Five out of seven domains in communication skills as evaluated by independent raters improved significantly, and there was a significant change in the global evaluation by SP. CONCLUSIONS: Although we were unable to make between-group comparisons, the results of the within group pre-post evaluation suggest that specific feedback helps improve communication skills. BioMed Central 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6368801/ /pubmed/30736764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1470-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Engerer, Cosima
Berberat, Pascal O.
Dinkel, Andreas
Rudolph, Bärbel
Sattel, Heribert
Wuensch, Alexander
Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators
title Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators
title_full Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators
title_fullStr Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators
title_full_unstemmed Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators
title_short Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators
title_sort specific feedback makes medical students better communicators
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1470-9
work_keys_str_mv AT engerercosima specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators
AT berberatpascalo specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators
AT dinkelandreas specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators
AT rudolphbarbel specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators
AT sattelheribert specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators
AT wuenschalexander specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators