Cargando…
Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators
BACKGROUND: Feedback is regarded a key element in teaching communication skills. However, specific aspects of feedback have not been systematically investigated in this context. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of communication skills training (CST) integrating s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1470-9 |
_version_ | 1783394066513264640 |
---|---|
author | Engerer, Cosima Berberat, Pascal O. Dinkel, Andreas Rudolph, Bärbel Sattel, Heribert Wuensch, Alexander |
author_facet | Engerer, Cosima Berberat, Pascal O. Dinkel, Andreas Rudolph, Bärbel Sattel, Heribert Wuensch, Alexander |
author_sort | Engerer, Cosima |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Feedback is regarded a key element in teaching communication skills. However, specific aspects of feedback have not been systematically investigated in this context. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of communication skills training (CST) integrating specific, structured and behavioral feedback. METHODS: We condensed best practice recommendations for feedback in a CST for undergraduate medical students and compared the effect of specific, structured and behavior-orientated feedback (intervention group CST-behav) to general, experience-orientated feedback (CST- exp. as our control group) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We investigated changes on communication skills evaluated by independent raters, and evaluated by standardized patients (SP). To do that, every student was video-recorded in a pre and post assessment. RESULTS: Sixty-six undergraduate medical students participated voluntarily in our study. Randomization did not result in equally skilled groups at baseline, so valid inter-group comparisons were not possible. Therefore, we analyzed the results of 34 students of our intervention group (CST-behav). Five out of seven domains in communication skills as evaluated by independent raters improved significantly, and there was a significant change in the global evaluation by SP. CONCLUSIONS: Although we were unable to make between-group comparisons, the results of the within group pre-post evaluation suggest that specific feedback helps improve communication skills. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6368801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63688012019-02-15 Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators Engerer, Cosima Berberat, Pascal O. Dinkel, Andreas Rudolph, Bärbel Sattel, Heribert Wuensch, Alexander BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Feedback is regarded a key element in teaching communication skills. However, specific aspects of feedback have not been systematically investigated in this context. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of communication skills training (CST) integrating specific, structured and behavioral feedback. METHODS: We condensed best practice recommendations for feedback in a CST for undergraduate medical students and compared the effect of specific, structured and behavior-orientated feedback (intervention group CST-behav) to general, experience-orientated feedback (CST- exp. as our control group) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We investigated changes on communication skills evaluated by independent raters, and evaluated by standardized patients (SP). To do that, every student was video-recorded in a pre and post assessment. RESULTS: Sixty-six undergraduate medical students participated voluntarily in our study. Randomization did not result in equally skilled groups at baseline, so valid inter-group comparisons were not possible. Therefore, we analyzed the results of 34 students of our intervention group (CST-behav). Five out of seven domains in communication skills as evaluated by independent raters improved significantly, and there was a significant change in the global evaluation by SP. CONCLUSIONS: Although we were unable to make between-group comparisons, the results of the within group pre-post evaluation suggest that specific feedback helps improve communication skills. BioMed Central 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6368801/ /pubmed/30736764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1470-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Engerer, Cosima Berberat, Pascal O. Dinkel, Andreas Rudolph, Bärbel Sattel, Heribert Wuensch, Alexander Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators |
title | Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators |
title_full | Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators |
title_fullStr | Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators |
title_full_unstemmed | Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators |
title_short | Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators |
title_sort | specific feedback makes medical students better communicators |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1470-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engerercosima specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators AT berberatpascalo specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators AT dinkelandreas specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators AT rudolphbarbel specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators AT sattelheribert specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators AT wuenschalexander specificfeedbackmakesmedicalstudentsbettercommunicators |