Cargando…

An adaptive geometric search algorithm for macromolecular scaffold selection

A wide variety of protein and peptidomimetic design tasks require matching functional 3D motifs to potential oligomeric scaffolds. For example, during enzyme design, one aims to graft active-site patterns—typically consisting of 3–15 residues—onto new protein surfaces. Identifying protein scaffolds...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Tian, Renfrew, P Douglas, Drew, Kevin, Youngs, Noah, Butterfoss, Glenn L, Bonneau, Richard, Shasha, Den Nis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30407584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzy028
_version_ 1783395036951478272
author Jiang, Tian
Renfrew, P Douglas
Drew, Kevin
Youngs, Noah
Butterfoss, Glenn L
Bonneau, Richard
Shasha, Den Nis
author_facet Jiang, Tian
Renfrew, P Douglas
Drew, Kevin
Youngs, Noah
Butterfoss, Glenn L
Bonneau, Richard
Shasha, Den Nis
author_sort Jiang, Tian
collection PubMed
description A wide variety of protein and peptidomimetic design tasks require matching functional 3D motifs to potential oligomeric scaffolds. For example, during enzyme design, one aims to graft active-site patterns—typically consisting of 3–15 residues—onto new protein surfaces. Identifying protein scaffolds suitable for such active-site engraftment requires costly searches for protein folds that provide the correct side chain positioning to host the desired active site. Other examples of biodesign tasks that require similar fast exact geometric searches of potential side chain positioning include mimicking binding hotspots, design of metal binding clusters and the design of modular hydrogen binding networks for specificity. In these applications, the speed and scaling of geometric searches limits the scope of downstream design to small patterns. Here, we present an adaptive algorithm capable of searching for side chain take-off angles, which is compatible with an arbitrarily specified functional pattern and which enjoys substantive performance improvements over previous methods. We demonstrate this method in both genetically encoded (protein) and synthetic (peptidomimetic) design scenarios. Examples of using this method with the Rosetta framework for protein design are provided. Our implementation is compatible with multiple protein design frameworks and is freely available as a set of python scripts (https://github.com/JiangTian/adaptive-geometric-search-for-protein-design).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6373690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63736902019-02-21 An adaptive geometric search algorithm for macromolecular scaffold selection Jiang, Tian Renfrew, P Douglas Drew, Kevin Youngs, Noah Butterfoss, Glenn L Bonneau, Richard Shasha, Den Nis Protein Eng Des Sel Methods A wide variety of protein and peptidomimetic design tasks require matching functional 3D motifs to potential oligomeric scaffolds. For example, during enzyme design, one aims to graft active-site patterns—typically consisting of 3–15 residues—onto new protein surfaces. Identifying protein scaffolds suitable for such active-site engraftment requires costly searches for protein folds that provide the correct side chain positioning to host the desired active site. Other examples of biodesign tasks that require similar fast exact geometric searches of potential side chain positioning include mimicking binding hotspots, design of metal binding clusters and the design of modular hydrogen binding networks for specificity. In these applications, the speed and scaling of geometric searches limits the scope of downstream design to small patterns. Here, we present an adaptive algorithm capable of searching for side chain take-off angles, which is compatible with an arbitrarily specified functional pattern and which enjoys substantive performance improvements over previous methods. We demonstrate this method in both genetically encoded (protein) and synthetic (peptidomimetic) design scenarios. Examples of using this method with the Rosetta framework for protein design are provided. Our implementation is compatible with multiple protein design frameworks and is freely available as a set of python scripts (https://github.com/JiangTian/adaptive-geometric-search-for-protein-design). Oxford University Press 2018-09 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6373690/ /pubmed/30407584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzy028 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods
Jiang, Tian
Renfrew, P Douglas
Drew, Kevin
Youngs, Noah
Butterfoss, Glenn L
Bonneau, Richard
Shasha, Den Nis
An adaptive geometric search algorithm for macromolecular scaffold selection
title An adaptive geometric search algorithm for macromolecular scaffold selection
title_full An adaptive geometric search algorithm for macromolecular scaffold selection
title_fullStr An adaptive geometric search algorithm for macromolecular scaffold selection
title_full_unstemmed An adaptive geometric search algorithm for macromolecular scaffold selection
title_short An adaptive geometric search algorithm for macromolecular scaffold selection
title_sort adaptive geometric search algorithm for macromolecular scaffold selection
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30407584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzy028
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangtian anadaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT renfrewpdouglas anadaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT drewkevin anadaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT youngsnoah anadaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT butterfossglennl anadaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT bonneaurichard anadaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT shashadennis anadaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT jiangtian adaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT renfrewpdouglas adaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT drewkevin adaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT youngsnoah adaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT butterfossglennl adaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT bonneaurichard adaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection
AT shashadennis adaptivegeometricsearchalgorithmformacromolecularscaffoldselection