Cargando…

Influence of Coating Application Methods on the Postharvest Quality of Cassava

Various modes of edible coating application vary in their coat dispersion and film formation, hence the need to determine the most effective mode of application for cassava. Edible surface coatings have been found to be effective in preserving the quality of various food products. However, there are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atieno, Loreto, Owino, Willis, Ateka, Elijah M., Ambuko, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2148914
_version_ 1783395988375863296
author Atieno, Loreto
Owino, Willis
Ateka, Elijah M.
Ambuko, Jane
author_facet Atieno, Loreto
Owino, Willis
Ateka, Elijah M.
Ambuko, Jane
author_sort Atieno, Loreto
collection PubMed
description Various modes of edible coating application vary in their coat dispersion and film formation, hence the need to determine the most effective mode of application for cassava. Edible surface coatings have been found to be effective in preserving the quality of various food products. However, there are variations in effectiveness among the different coating solutions, hence the need for optimization of the concentrations of the gums used. This study aimed at determining the most efficient coating application method on the cassava postharvest quality. Physiologically mature cassava (variety KME 1) was harvested and divided into seven portions. The various portions were coated using 1.5% xanthan gum, 1.5% xanthan/guar gum, and 2% xanthan/guar gum by both dipping and spraying method. There was no significant difference on the colour, total cyanide, ethylene production, and total phenolic content between the two application methods. The 2% xanthan/guar gum coating showed a significant difference on the dry matter content while the 1.5% xanthan gum coating had a significant difference on the respiration rate and weight loss. The 1.5 xanthan treated roots had a final dry matter content of 72.5% for the sprayed samples and 75.98% for the dipped sample while the 2% xanthan/guar gum treated roots had a final dry matter content of 64.6% and 74.1% for the dipped and sprayed root samples, respectively. The 1.5% xanthan and 2% xanthan/guar gum treated roots showed no significant difference in their action on dry matter content. The 1.5% xanthan/guar dipped and sprayed samples differed significantly on their effect on flesh firmness with final values of 35.4N and 46.1N, respectively, at 20 days after harvest. This study suggested that based on the coating solution and the parameters being observed, there generally was no varying effect of dipping and spraying methods of coating application. The choice of the efficient mode of application to use will depend on other factors such as the easiness of application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6378783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63787832019-03-12 Influence of Coating Application Methods on the Postharvest Quality of Cassava Atieno, Loreto Owino, Willis Ateka, Elijah M. Ambuko, Jane Int J Food Sci Research Article Various modes of edible coating application vary in their coat dispersion and film formation, hence the need to determine the most effective mode of application for cassava. Edible surface coatings have been found to be effective in preserving the quality of various food products. However, there are variations in effectiveness among the different coating solutions, hence the need for optimization of the concentrations of the gums used. This study aimed at determining the most efficient coating application method on the cassava postharvest quality. Physiologically mature cassava (variety KME 1) was harvested and divided into seven portions. The various portions were coated using 1.5% xanthan gum, 1.5% xanthan/guar gum, and 2% xanthan/guar gum by both dipping and spraying method. There was no significant difference on the colour, total cyanide, ethylene production, and total phenolic content between the two application methods. The 2% xanthan/guar gum coating showed a significant difference on the dry matter content while the 1.5% xanthan gum coating had a significant difference on the respiration rate and weight loss. The 1.5 xanthan treated roots had a final dry matter content of 72.5% for the sprayed samples and 75.98% for the dipped sample while the 2% xanthan/guar gum treated roots had a final dry matter content of 64.6% and 74.1% for the dipped and sprayed root samples, respectively. The 1.5% xanthan and 2% xanthan/guar gum treated roots showed no significant difference in their action on dry matter content. The 1.5% xanthan/guar dipped and sprayed samples differed significantly on their effect on flesh firmness with final values of 35.4N and 46.1N, respectively, at 20 days after harvest. This study suggested that based on the coating solution and the parameters being observed, there generally was no varying effect of dipping and spraying methods of coating application. The choice of the efficient mode of application to use will depend on other factors such as the easiness of application. Hindawi 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6378783/ /pubmed/30863776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2148914 Text en Copyright © 2019 Loreto Atieno et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Atieno, Loreto
Owino, Willis
Ateka, Elijah M.
Ambuko, Jane
Influence of Coating Application Methods on the Postharvest Quality of Cassava
title Influence of Coating Application Methods on the Postharvest Quality of Cassava
title_full Influence of Coating Application Methods on the Postharvest Quality of Cassava
title_fullStr Influence of Coating Application Methods on the Postharvest Quality of Cassava
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Coating Application Methods on the Postharvest Quality of Cassava
title_short Influence of Coating Application Methods on the Postharvest Quality of Cassava
title_sort influence of coating application methods on the postharvest quality of cassava
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2148914
work_keys_str_mv AT atienoloreto influenceofcoatingapplicationmethodsonthepostharvestqualityofcassava
AT owinowillis influenceofcoatingapplicationmethodsonthepostharvestqualityofcassava
AT atekaelijahm influenceofcoatingapplicationmethodsonthepostharvestqualityofcassava
AT ambukojane influenceofcoatingapplicationmethodsonthepostharvestqualityofcassava