Cargando…

Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies evaluating the organ protective effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors

The clinical efficacy of organ protection interventions are limited by the redundancy of cellular activation mechanisms. Interventions that target epigenetic mechanisms overcome this by eliciting genome wide changes in transcription and signaling. We aimed to review preclinical studies evaluating th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yusoff, Syabira I., Roman, Marius, Lai, Florence Y., Eagle-Hemming, Bryony, Murphy, Gavin J., Kumar, Tracy, Wozniak, Marcin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30528323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2018.11.002
_version_ 1783397405190782976
author Yusoff, Syabira I.
Roman, Marius
Lai, Florence Y.
Eagle-Hemming, Bryony
Murphy, Gavin J.
Kumar, Tracy
Wozniak, Marcin
author_facet Yusoff, Syabira I.
Roman, Marius
Lai, Florence Y.
Eagle-Hemming, Bryony
Murphy, Gavin J.
Kumar, Tracy
Wozniak, Marcin
author_sort Yusoff, Syabira I.
collection PubMed
description The clinical efficacy of organ protection interventions are limited by the redundancy of cellular activation mechanisms. Interventions that target epigenetic mechanisms overcome this by eliciting genome wide changes in transcription and signaling. We aimed to review preclinical studies evaluating the organ protection effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) with a view to informing the design of early phase clinical trials. A systematic literature search was performed. Methodological quality was assessed against prespecified criteria. The primary outcome was mortality, with secondary outcomes assessing mechanisms. Prespecified analyses evaluated the effects of likely moderators on heterogeneity. The analysis included 101 experimental studies in rodents (n = 92) and swine (n = 9), exposed to diverse injuries, including: ischemia (n = 72), infection (n = 7), and trauma (n = 22). There were a total of 448 comparisons due to the evaluation of multiple independent interventions within single studies. Sodium valproate (VPA) was the most commonly evaluated HDACi (50 studies, 203 comparisons). All of the studies were judged to have significant methodological limitations. HDACi reduced mortality in experimental models of organ injury (risk ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.40–0.68, p < 0.001) without heterogeneity. HDACi administration resulted in myocardial, brain and kidney protection across diverse species and injuries that was attributable to increases in prosurvival cell signaling, and reductions in inflammation and programmed cell death. Heterogeneity in the analyses of secondary outcomes was explained by differences in species, type of injury, HDACi class (Class I better), drug (trichostatin better), and time of administration (at least 6 hours prior to injury better). These findings highlight a potential novel application for HDACi in clinical settings characterized by acute organ injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6386580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63865802019-03-04 Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies evaluating the organ protective effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors Yusoff, Syabira I. Roman, Marius Lai, Florence Y. Eagle-Hemming, Bryony Murphy, Gavin J. Kumar, Tracy Wozniak, Marcin Transl Res Article The clinical efficacy of organ protection interventions are limited by the redundancy of cellular activation mechanisms. Interventions that target epigenetic mechanisms overcome this by eliciting genome wide changes in transcription and signaling. We aimed to review preclinical studies evaluating the organ protection effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) with a view to informing the design of early phase clinical trials. A systematic literature search was performed. Methodological quality was assessed against prespecified criteria. The primary outcome was mortality, with secondary outcomes assessing mechanisms. Prespecified analyses evaluated the effects of likely moderators on heterogeneity. The analysis included 101 experimental studies in rodents (n = 92) and swine (n = 9), exposed to diverse injuries, including: ischemia (n = 72), infection (n = 7), and trauma (n = 22). There were a total of 448 comparisons due to the evaluation of multiple independent interventions within single studies. Sodium valproate (VPA) was the most commonly evaluated HDACi (50 studies, 203 comparisons). All of the studies were judged to have significant methodological limitations. HDACi reduced mortality in experimental models of organ injury (risk ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.40–0.68, p < 0.001) without heterogeneity. HDACi administration resulted in myocardial, brain and kidney protection across diverse species and injuries that was attributable to increases in prosurvival cell signaling, and reductions in inflammation and programmed cell death. Heterogeneity in the analyses of secondary outcomes was explained by differences in species, type of injury, HDACi class (Class I better), drug (trichostatin better), and time of administration (at least 6 hours prior to injury better). These findings highlight a potential novel application for HDACi in clinical settings characterized by acute organ injury. Elsevier 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6386580/ /pubmed/30528323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2018.11.002 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yusoff, Syabira I.
Roman, Marius
Lai, Florence Y.
Eagle-Hemming, Bryony
Murphy, Gavin J.
Kumar, Tracy
Wozniak, Marcin
Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies evaluating the organ protective effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies evaluating the organ protective effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies evaluating the organ protective effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies evaluating the organ protective effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies evaluating the organ protective effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies evaluating the organ protective effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies evaluating the organ protective effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30528323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2018.11.002
work_keys_str_mv AT yusoffsyabirai systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofexperimentalstudiesevaluatingtheorganprotectiveeffectsofhistonedeacetylaseinhibitors
AT romanmarius systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofexperimentalstudiesevaluatingtheorganprotectiveeffectsofhistonedeacetylaseinhibitors
AT laiflorencey systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofexperimentalstudiesevaluatingtheorganprotectiveeffectsofhistonedeacetylaseinhibitors
AT eaglehemmingbryony systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofexperimentalstudiesevaluatingtheorganprotectiveeffectsofhistonedeacetylaseinhibitors
AT murphygavinj systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofexperimentalstudiesevaluatingtheorganprotectiveeffectsofhistonedeacetylaseinhibitors
AT kumartracy systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofexperimentalstudiesevaluatingtheorganprotectiveeffectsofhistonedeacetylaseinhibitors
AT wozniakmarcin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofexperimentalstudiesevaluatingtheorganprotectiveeffectsofhistonedeacetylaseinhibitors