Cargando…

Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES: To assess the construct validity and reliability of the motivation section of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was conducted.  The MSQL has essentially tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bin Dayel, Salman, Al Diab, Abdurrahman, Abdelaziz, Adel, Farghaly, Amira, Al Ansari, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IJME 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30504525
http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5bec.81cf
_version_ 1783397638476922880
author Bin Dayel, Salman
Al Diab, Abdurrahman
Abdelaziz, Adel
Farghaly, Amira
Al Ansari, Ahmed
author_facet Bin Dayel, Salman
Al Diab, Abdurrahman
Abdelaziz, Adel
Farghaly, Amira
Al Ansari, Ahmed
author_sort Bin Dayel, Salman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the construct validity and reliability of the motivation section of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was conducted.  The MSQL has essentially two sections: a motivation section and a learning strategies section.  The motivation section, which consists of 31 items, was used.  A total of 146 medical students who were all male completed the questionnaire.  Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the hypothesised factor structure, and to identify the validity and reliability of the motivation section of the MSQL.     RESULTS: A selected group of fit statistics showed that the hypothesised model did not fit the sample data fairly well.  The Intrinsic Goal Orientation subscale consisted of 4 items (α = 0.75), the Extrinsic Goal Orientation subscale consisted of 4 items (α = 0.78), the Task Value subscale consisted of 6 items (α =0.86), the Control of Learning Beliefs consisted of 4 items (α =0.78), the Self-Efficacy for Learning and Performance consisted of 8 items (α =0.89), and the Test Anxiety consisted of 5 items (α =0.77). CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the hypothesised model did not fit the data well. This may suggest that the motivation section of the MSQL may not work for Saudi Arabian students. However, this could be due to the fact that the sample data available on this study did not represent female students. Further work is required to establish this. Limitations of the study are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6387767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher IJME
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63877672019-03-05 Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in Saudi Arabia Bin Dayel, Salman Al Diab, Abdurrahman Abdelaziz, Adel Farghaly, Amira Al Ansari, Ahmed Int J Med Educ Original Research OBJECTIVES: To assess the construct validity and reliability of the motivation section of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was conducted.  The MSQL has essentially two sections: a motivation section and a learning strategies section.  The motivation section, which consists of 31 items, was used.  A total of 146 medical students who were all male completed the questionnaire.  Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the hypothesised factor structure, and to identify the validity and reliability of the motivation section of the MSQL.     RESULTS: A selected group of fit statistics showed that the hypothesised model did not fit the sample data fairly well.  The Intrinsic Goal Orientation subscale consisted of 4 items (α = 0.75), the Extrinsic Goal Orientation subscale consisted of 4 items (α = 0.78), the Task Value subscale consisted of 6 items (α =0.86), the Control of Learning Beliefs consisted of 4 items (α =0.78), the Self-Efficacy for Learning and Performance consisted of 8 items (α =0.89), and the Test Anxiety consisted of 5 items (α =0.77). CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the hypothesised model did not fit the data well. This may suggest that the motivation section of the MSQL may not work for Saudi Arabian students. However, this could be due to the fact that the sample data available on this study did not represent female students. Further work is required to establish this. Limitations of the study are discussed. IJME 2018-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6387767/ /pubmed/30504525 http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5bec.81cf Text en Copyright: © 2018 Salman Bin Dayel et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use of work provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Bin Dayel, Salman
Al Diab, Abdurrahman
Abdelaziz, Adel
Farghaly, Amira
Al Ansari, Ahmed
Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in Saudi Arabia
title Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in Saudi Arabia
title_full Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in Saudi Arabia
title_short Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in Saudi Arabia
title_sort validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in saudi arabia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30504525
http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5bec.81cf
work_keys_str_mv AT bindayelsalman validityofthemotivatedstrategiesforlearningquestionnaireinsaudiarabia
AT aldiababdurrahman validityofthemotivatedstrategiesforlearningquestionnaireinsaudiarabia
AT abdelazizadel validityofthemotivatedstrategiesforlearningquestionnaireinsaudiarabia
AT farghalyamira validityofthemotivatedstrategiesforlearningquestionnaireinsaudiarabia
AT alansariahmed validityofthemotivatedstrategiesforlearningquestionnaireinsaudiarabia