Cargando…

The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation

Knowledge about a tool’s dynamics can be acquired from the visual configuration of the tool and through physical interaction. Here, we examine how visual information affects the generalization of dynamic learning during tool use. Subjects rotated a virtual hammer-like object while we varied the obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadeghi, Mohsen, Sheahan, Hannah R., Ingram, James N., Wolpert, Daniel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39507-5
_version_ 1783398047677415424
author Sadeghi, Mohsen
Sheahan, Hannah R.
Ingram, James N.
Wolpert, Daniel M.
author_facet Sadeghi, Mohsen
Sheahan, Hannah R.
Ingram, James N.
Wolpert, Daniel M.
author_sort Sadeghi, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description Knowledge about a tool’s dynamics can be acquired from the visual configuration of the tool and through physical interaction. Here, we examine how visual information affects the generalization of dynamic learning during tool use. Subjects rotated a virtual hammer-like object while we varied the object dynamics separately for two rotational directions. This allowed us to quantify the coupling of adaptation between the directions, that is, how adaptation transferred from one direction to the other. Two groups experienced the same dynamics of the object. For one group, the object’s visual configuration was displayed, while for the other, the visual display was uninformative as to the dynamics. We fit a range of context-dependent state-space models to the data, comparing different forms of coupling. We found that when the object’s visual configuration was explicitly provided, there was substantial coupling, such that 31% of learning in one direction transferred to the other. In contrast, when the visual configuration was ambiguous, despite experiencing the same dynamics, the coupling was reduced to 12%. Our results suggest that generalization of dynamic learning of a tool relies, not only on its dynamic behaviour, but also on the visual configuration with which the dynamics is associated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6389992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63899922019-02-28 The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation Sadeghi, Mohsen Sheahan, Hannah R. Ingram, James N. Wolpert, Daniel M. Sci Rep Article Knowledge about a tool’s dynamics can be acquired from the visual configuration of the tool and through physical interaction. Here, we examine how visual information affects the generalization of dynamic learning during tool use. Subjects rotated a virtual hammer-like object while we varied the object dynamics separately for two rotational directions. This allowed us to quantify the coupling of adaptation between the directions, that is, how adaptation transferred from one direction to the other. Two groups experienced the same dynamics of the object. For one group, the object’s visual configuration was displayed, while for the other, the visual display was uninformative as to the dynamics. We fit a range of context-dependent state-space models to the data, comparing different forms of coupling. We found that when the object’s visual configuration was explicitly provided, there was substantial coupling, such that 31% of learning in one direction transferred to the other. In contrast, when the visual configuration was ambiguous, despite experiencing the same dynamics, the coupling was reduced to 12%. Our results suggest that generalization of dynamic learning of a tool relies, not only on its dynamic behaviour, but also on the visual configuration with which the dynamics is associated. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6389992/ /pubmed/30804540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39507-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sadeghi, Mohsen
Sheahan, Hannah R.
Ingram, James N.
Wolpert, Daniel M.
The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation
title The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation
title_full The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation
title_fullStr The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation
title_full_unstemmed The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation
title_short The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation
title_sort visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39507-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sadeghimohsen thevisualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation
AT sheahanhannahr thevisualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation
AT ingramjamesn thevisualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation
AT wolpertdanielm thevisualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation
AT sadeghimohsen visualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation
AT sheahanhannahr visualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation
AT ingramjamesn visualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation
AT wolpertdanielm visualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation