Cargando…
The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation
Knowledge about a tool’s dynamics can be acquired from the visual configuration of the tool and through physical interaction. Here, we examine how visual information affects the generalization of dynamic learning during tool use. Subjects rotated a virtual hammer-like object while we varied the obje...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39507-5 |
_version_ | 1783398047677415424 |
---|---|
author | Sadeghi, Mohsen Sheahan, Hannah R. Ingram, James N. Wolpert, Daniel M. |
author_facet | Sadeghi, Mohsen Sheahan, Hannah R. Ingram, James N. Wolpert, Daniel M. |
author_sort | Sadeghi, Mohsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Knowledge about a tool’s dynamics can be acquired from the visual configuration of the tool and through physical interaction. Here, we examine how visual information affects the generalization of dynamic learning during tool use. Subjects rotated a virtual hammer-like object while we varied the object dynamics separately for two rotational directions. This allowed us to quantify the coupling of adaptation between the directions, that is, how adaptation transferred from one direction to the other. Two groups experienced the same dynamics of the object. For one group, the object’s visual configuration was displayed, while for the other, the visual display was uninformative as to the dynamics. We fit a range of context-dependent state-space models to the data, comparing different forms of coupling. We found that when the object’s visual configuration was explicitly provided, there was substantial coupling, such that 31% of learning in one direction transferred to the other. In contrast, when the visual configuration was ambiguous, despite experiencing the same dynamics, the coupling was reduced to 12%. Our results suggest that generalization of dynamic learning of a tool relies, not only on its dynamic behaviour, but also on the visual configuration with which the dynamics is associated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6389992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63899922019-02-28 The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation Sadeghi, Mohsen Sheahan, Hannah R. Ingram, James N. Wolpert, Daniel M. Sci Rep Article Knowledge about a tool’s dynamics can be acquired from the visual configuration of the tool and through physical interaction. Here, we examine how visual information affects the generalization of dynamic learning during tool use. Subjects rotated a virtual hammer-like object while we varied the object dynamics separately for two rotational directions. This allowed us to quantify the coupling of adaptation between the directions, that is, how adaptation transferred from one direction to the other. Two groups experienced the same dynamics of the object. For one group, the object’s visual configuration was displayed, while for the other, the visual display was uninformative as to the dynamics. We fit a range of context-dependent state-space models to the data, comparing different forms of coupling. We found that when the object’s visual configuration was explicitly provided, there was substantial coupling, such that 31% of learning in one direction transferred to the other. In contrast, when the visual configuration was ambiguous, despite experiencing the same dynamics, the coupling was reduced to 12%. Our results suggest that generalization of dynamic learning of a tool relies, not only on its dynamic behaviour, but also on the visual configuration with which the dynamics is associated. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6389992/ /pubmed/30804540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39507-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Sadeghi, Mohsen Sheahan, Hannah R. Ingram, James N. Wolpert, Daniel M. The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation |
title | The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation |
title_full | The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation |
title_fullStr | The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation |
title_full_unstemmed | The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation |
title_short | The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation |
title_sort | visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39507-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sadeghimohsen thevisualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation AT sheahanhannahr thevisualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation AT ingramjamesn thevisualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation AT wolpertdanielm thevisualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation AT sadeghimohsen visualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation AT sheahanhannahr visualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation AT ingramjamesn visualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation AT wolpertdanielm visualgeometryofatoolmodulatesgeneralizationduringadaptation |