Cargando…

Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability

Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are criterion valid low fidelity measures that have gained much popularity as predictors of job performance. A broad variety of SJTs have been studied, but SJTs measuring personality are still rare. Personality traits such as Conscientiousness are valid predictors o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olaru, Gabriel, Burrus, Jeremy, MacCann, Carolyn, Zaromb, Franklin M., Wilhelm, Oliver, Roberts, Richard D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211884
_version_ 1783398435804676096
author Olaru, Gabriel
Burrus, Jeremy
MacCann, Carolyn
Zaromb, Franklin M.
Wilhelm, Oliver
Roberts, Richard D.
author_facet Olaru, Gabriel
Burrus, Jeremy
MacCann, Carolyn
Zaromb, Franklin M.
Wilhelm, Oliver
Roberts, Richard D.
author_sort Olaru, Gabriel
collection PubMed
description Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are criterion valid low fidelity measures that have gained much popularity as predictors of job performance. A broad variety of SJTs have been studied, but SJTs measuring personality are still rare. Personality traits such as Conscientiousness are valid predictors of many educational, work and life-related outcomes and SJTs are less prone to faking than classical self-report measurements. We developed an SJT measure of Dependability, a core facet of Conscientiousness, by gathering critical incidents in semi-structured interviews using the construct definition of Dependability as a prompt. We examined the psychometric properties of the newly developed SJTs across two studies (N = 546 general population; N = 440 sales professionals). The internal validity of the SJTs was examined by correlating the SJT scores with related self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness, as well as testing the unidimensionality of the measure with CFA. Additionally, we specified a bi-factor model of SJT, self-report and behavioral checklist measures of Dependability accounting for common and specific measurement variance. External validity was examined by correlating the SJT scale and specific factor with work-related outcomes. The results show that the Dependability SJTs with an expert based scoring procedure were psychometrically sound and correlated moderately to highly with traditional self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness. However, a large proportion of SJT variance cannot be accounted for by personality alone. This supports the notion that SJTs measure general domain knowledge about the effectiveness of personality-related behaviors. We conclude that SJT measures of personality can be a promising addition to classical self-report assessments and can be used in a wide variety of applications beyond measurement and selection, for instance as formative assessments of personality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6392235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63922352019-03-08 Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability Olaru, Gabriel Burrus, Jeremy MacCann, Carolyn Zaromb, Franklin M. Wilhelm, Oliver Roberts, Richard D. PLoS One Research Article Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are criterion valid low fidelity measures that have gained much popularity as predictors of job performance. A broad variety of SJTs have been studied, but SJTs measuring personality are still rare. Personality traits such as Conscientiousness are valid predictors of many educational, work and life-related outcomes and SJTs are less prone to faking than classical self-report measurements. We developed an SJT measure of Dependability, a core facet of Conscientiousness, by gathering critical incidents in semi-structured interviews using the construct definition of Dependability as a prompt. We examined the psychometric properties of the newly developed SJTs across two studies (N = 546 general population; N = 440 sales professionals). The internal validity of the SJTs was examined by correlating the SJT scores with related self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness, as well as testing the unidimensionality of the measure with CFA. Additionally, we specified a bi-factor model of SJT, self-report and behavioral checklist measures of Dependability accounting for common and specific measurement variance. External validity was examined by correlating the SJT scale and specific factor with work-related outcomes. The results show that the Dependability SJTs with an expert based scoring procedure were psychometrically sound and correlated moderately to highly with traditional self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness. However, a large proportion of SJT variance cannot be accounted for by personality alone. This supports the notion that SJTs measure general domain knowledge about the effectiveness of personality-related behaviors. We conclude that SJT measures of personality can be a promising addition to classical self-report assessments and can be used in a wide variety of applications beyond measurement and selection, for instance as formative assessments of personality. Public Library of Science 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6392235/ /pubmed/30811463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211884 Text en © 2019 Olaru et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olaru, Gabriel
Burrus, Jeremy
MacCann, Carolyn
Zaromb, Franklin M.
Wilhelm, Oliver
Roberts, Richard D.
Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability
title Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability
title_full Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability
title_fullStr Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability
title_full_unstemmed Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability
title_short Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability
title_sort situational judgment tests as a method for measuring personality: development and validity evidence for a test of dependability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211884
work_keys_str_mv AT olarugabriel situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability
AT burrusjeremy situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability
AT maccanncarolyn situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability
AT zarombfranklinm situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability
AT wilhelmoliver situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability
AT robertsrichardd situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability