Cargando…
Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability
Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are criterion valid low fidelity measures that have gained much popularity as predictors of job performance. A broad variety of SJTs have been studied, but SJTs measuring personality are still rare. Personality traits such as Conscientiousness are valid predictors o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211884 |
_version_ | 1783398435804676096 |
---|---|
author | Olaru, Gabriel Burrus, Jeremy MacCann, Carolyn Zaromb, Franklin M. Wilhelm, Oliver Roberts, Richard D. |
author_facet | Olaru, Gabriel Burrus, Jeremy MacCann, Carolyn Zaromb, Franklin M. Wilhelm, Oliver Roberts, Richard D. |
author_sort | Olaru, Gabriel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are criterion valid low fidelity measures that have gained much popularity as predictors of job performance. A broad variety of SJTs have been studied, but SJTs measuring personality are still rare. Personality traits such as Conscientiousness are valid predictors of many educational, work and life-related outcomes and SJTs are less prone to faking than classical self-report measurements. We developed an SJT measure of Dependability, a core facet of Conscientiousness, by gathering critical incidents in semi-structured interviews using the construct definition of Dependability as a prompt. We examined the psychometric properties of the newly developed SJTs across two studies (N = 546 general population; N = 440 sales professionals). The internal validity of the SJTs was examined by correlating the SJT scores with related self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness, as well as testing the unidimensionality of the measure with CFA. Additionally, we specified a bi-factor model of SJT, self-report and behavioral checklist measures of Dependability accounting for common and specific measurement variance. External validity was examined by correlating the SJT scale and specific factor with work-related outcomes. The results show that the Dependability SJTs with an expert based scoring procedure were psychometrically sound and correlated moderately to highly with traditional self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness. However, a large proportion of SJT variance cannot be accounted for by personality alone. This supports the notion that SJTs measure general domain knowledge about the effectiveness of personality-related behaviors. We conclude that SJT measures of personality can be a promising addition to classical self-report assessments and can be used in a wide variety of applications beyond measurement and selection, for instance as formative assessments of personality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6392235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63922352019-03-08 Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability Olaru, Gabriel Burrus, Jeremy MacCann, Carolyn Zaromb, Franklin M. Wilhelm, Oliver Roberts, Richard D. PLoS One Research Article Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are criterion valid low fidelity measures that have gained much popularity as predictors of job performance. A broad variety of SJTs have been studied, but SJTs measuring personality are still rare. Personality traits such as Conscientiousness are valid predictors of many educational, work and life-related outcomes and SJTs are less prone to faking than classical self-report measurements. We developed an SJT measure of Dependability, a core facet of Conscientiousness, by gathering critical incidents in semi-structured interviews using the construct definition of Dependability as a prompt. We examined the psychometric properties of the newly developed SJTs across two studies (N = 546 general population; N = 440 sales professionals). The internal validity of the SJTs was examined by correlating the SJT scores with related self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness, as well as testing the unidimensionality of the measure with CFA. Additionally, we specified a bi-factor model of SJT, self-report and behavioral checklist measures of Dependability accounting for common and specific measurement variance. External validity was examined by correlating the SJT scale and specific factor with work-related outcomes. The results show that the Dependability SJTs with an expert based scoring procedure were psychometrically sound and correlated moderately to highly with traditional self-report measures of Dependability and Conscientiousness. However, a large proportion of SJT variance cannot be accounted for by personality alone. This supports the notion that SJTs measure general domain knowledge about the effectiveness of personality-related behaviors. We conclude that SJT measures of personality can be a promising addition to classical self-report assessments and can be used in a wide variety of applications beyond measurement and selection, for instance as formative assessments of personality. Public Library of Science 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6392235/ /pubmed/30811463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211884 Text en © 2019 Olaru et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Olaru, Gabriel Burrus, Jeremy MacCann, Carolyn Zaromb, Franklin M. Wilhelm, Oliver Roberts, Richard D. Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability |
title | Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability |
title_full | Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability |
title_fullStr | Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability |
title_full_unstemmed | Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability |
title_short | Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability |
title_sort | situational judgment tests as a method for measuring personality: development and validity evidence for a test of dependability |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6392235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211884 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olarugabriel situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability AT burrusjeremy situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability AT maccanncarolyn situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability AT zarombfranklinm situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability AT wilhelmoliver situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability AT robertsrichardd situationaljudgmenttestsasamethodformeasuringpersonalitydevelopmentandvalidityevidenceforatestofdependability |