Cargando…
The long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin D1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours
BACKGROUND: Use of cyclin D1 (CCND1) gene amplification as a breast cancer biomarker has been hampered by conflicting assessments of the relationship between cyclin D1 protein levels and patient survival. Here, we aimed to clarify its prognostic and treatment predictive potential through comprehensi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1121-4 |
_version_ | 1783398827534843904 |
---|---|
author | Lundberg, Arian Lindström, Linda S. Li, Jingmei Harrell, J. Chuck Darai-Ramqvist, Eva Sifakis, Emmanouil G. Foukakis, Theodoros Perou, Charles M. Czene, Kamila Bergh, Jonas Tobin, Nicholas P. |
author_facet | Lundberg, Arian Lindström, Linda S. Li, Jingmei Harrell, J. Chuck Darai-Ramqvist, Eva Sifakis, Emmanouil G. Foukakis, Theodoros Perou, Charles M. Czene, Kamila Bergh, Jonas Tobin, Nicholas P. |
author_sort | Lundberg, Arian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Use of cyclin D1 (CCND1) gene amplification as a breast cancer biomarker has been hampered by conflicting assessments of the relationship between cyclin D1 protein levels and patient survival. Here, we aimed to clarify its prognostic and treatment predictive potential through comprehensive long-term survival analyses. METHODS: CCND1 amplification was assessed using SNP arrays from two cohorts of 1965 and 340 patients with matching gene expression array and clinical follow-up data of over 15 years. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine survival differences between CCND1 amplified vs. non-amplified tumours in clinically relevant patient sets, within PAM50 subtypes and within treatment-specific subgroups. Boxplots and differential gene expression analyses were performed to assess differences between amplified vs. non-amplified tumours within PAM50 subtypes. RESULTS: When combining both cohorts, worse survival was found for patients with CCND1-amplified tumours in luminal A (HR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15–2.46), luminal B (1.37; 1.01–1.86) and ER+/LN−/HER2− (1.66; 1.14–2.41) subgroups. In gene expression analysis, CCND1-amplified luminal A tumours showed increased proliferation (P < 0.001) and decreased progesterone (P = 0.002) levels along with a large overlap in differentially expressed genes when comparing luminal A and B-amplified vs. non-amplified tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that CCND1 amplification is associated with worse 15-year survival in ER+/LN−/HER2−, luminal A and luminal B patients. Moreover, luminal A CCND1-amplified tumours display gene expression changes consistent with a more aggressive phenotype. These novel findings highlight the potential of CCND1 to identify patients that could benefit from long-term treatment strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6394106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63941062019-03-11 The long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin D1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours Lundberg, Arian Lindström, Linda S. Li, Jingmei Harrell, J. Chuck Darai-Ramqvist, Eva Sifakis, Emmanouil G. Foukakis, Theodoros Perou, Charles M. Czene, Kamila Bergh, Jonas Tobin, Nicholas P. Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Use of cyclin D1 (CCND1) gene amplification as a breast cancer biomarker has been hampered by conflicting assessments of the relationship between cyclin D1 protein levels and patient survival. Here, we aimed to clarify its prognostic and treatment predictive potential through comprehensive long-term survival analyses. METHODS: CCND1 amplification was assessed using SNP arrays from two cohorts of 1965 and 340 patients with matching gene expression array and clinical follow-up data of over 15 years. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine survival differences between CCND1 amplified vs. non-amplified tumours in clinically relevant patient sets, within PAM50 subtypes and within treatment-specific subgroups. Boxplots and differential gene expression analyses were performed to assess differences between amplified vs. non-amplified tumours within PAM50 subtypes. RESULTS: When combining both cohorts, worse survival was found for patients with CCND1-amplified tumours in luminal A (HR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15–2.46), luminal B (1.37; 1.01–1.86) and ER+/LN−/HER2− (1.66; 1.14–2.41) subgroups. In gene expression analysis, CCND1-amplified luminal A tumours showed increased proliferation (P < 0.001) and decreased progesterone (P = 0.002) levels along with a large overlap in differentially expressed genes when comparing luminal A and B-amplified vs. non-amplified tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that CCND1 amplification is associated with worse 15-year survival in ER+/LN−/HER2−, luminal A and luminal B patients. Moreover, luminal A CCND1-amplified tumours display gene expression changes consistent with a more aggressive phenotype. These novel findings highlight the potential of CCND1 to identify patients that could benefit from long-term treatment strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1121-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6394106/ /pubmed/30819233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1121-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lundberg, Arian Lindström, Linda S. Li, Jingmei Harrell, J. Chuck Darai-Ramqvist, Eva Sifakis, Emmanouil G. Foukakis, Theodoros Perou, Charles M. Czene, Kamila Bergh, Jonas Tobin, Nicholas P. The long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin D1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours |
title | The long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin D1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours |
title_full | The long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin D1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours |
title_fullStr | The long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin D1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours |
title_full_unstemmed | The long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin D1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours |
title_short | The long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin D1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours |
title_sort | long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin d1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1121-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lundbergarian thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT lindstromlindas thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT lijingmei thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT harrelljchuck thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT darairamqvisteva thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT sifakisemmanouilg thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT foukakistheodoros thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT peroucharlesm thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT czenekamila thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT berghjonas thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT tobinnicholasp thelongtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT lundbergarian longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT lindstromlindas longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT lijingmei longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT harrelljchuck longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT darairamqvisteva longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT sifakisemmanouilg longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT foukakistheodoros longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT peroucharlesm longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT czenekamila longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT berghjonas longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours AT tobinnicholasp longtermprognosticandpredictivecapacityofcyclind1geneamplificationin2305breasttumours |