Cargando…

Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum

BACKGROUND: Many public health programs fail because of an inability to implement tested interventions in diverse, complex settings. The field of implementation science is engaged in developing strategies for successful implementation, but current training is primarily researcher-focused. To tackle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramaswamy, Rohit, Mosnier, Joe, Reed, Kristin, Powell, Byron J., Schenck, Anna P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0866-6
_version_ 1783399267575005184
author Ramaswamy, Rohit
Mosnier, Joe
Reed, Kristin
Powell, Byron J.
Schenck, Anna P.
author_facet Ramaswamy, Rohit
Mosnier, Joe
Reed, Kristin
Powell, Byron J.
Schenck, Anna P.
author_sort Ramaswamy, Rohit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many public health programs fail because of an inability to implement tested interventions in diverse, complex settings. The field of implementation science is engaged in developing strategies for successful implementation, but current training is primarily researcher-focused. To tackle the challenges of the twenty-first century, public health leaders are promoting a new model titled Public Health 3.0 where public health practitioners become “chief health strategists” and develop interdisciplinary skills for multisector engagement to achieve impact. This requires broad training for public health practitioners in implementation science that includes the allied fields of systems and design thinking, quality improvement, and innovative evaluation methods. At UNC Chapel Hill’s Gillings School of Global Public Health, we created an interdisciplinary set of courses in applied implementation science for Master of Public Health (MPH) students and public health practitioners. We describe our rationale, conceptual approach, pedagogy, courses, and initial results to assist other schools contemplating similar programs. METHODS: Our conceptual approach recognized the vital relationship between implementation research and practice. We conducted a literature review of thought leaders in public health to identify skill areas related to implementation science that are priorities for the future workforce. We also reviewed currently available training programs in implementation science to understand their scope and objectives and to assess whether any of these would be a fit for these priorities. We used a design focused implementation framework to create four linked courses drawing from multiple fields such as engineering, management, and the social sciences and emphasizing application through case studies. We validated the course content by mapping them to implementation science competencies in the literature. RESULTS: To date, there is no other program that provides comprehensive interdisciplinary skills in applied implementation science for MPH students. As of April 2018, we have offered a total of eleven sections of the four courses, with a total enrollment of 142, of whom 127 have been master’s-level students in the school of public health. Using Kirkpatrick’s Model, we found positive student reaction, learning, and behavior. Many students have completed applied implementation science focused practicums, master’s papers, and special studies. CONCLUSIONS: A systematically designed interdisciplinary curriculum in applied implementation science for MPH students has been found by students to be a useful set of skills. Students have demonstrated the capability to master this material and incorporate it into their practicums and master’s papers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-019-0866-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6396520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63965202019-03-13 Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum Ramaswamy, Rohit Mosnier, Joe Reed, Kristin Powell, Byron J. Schenck, Anna P. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Many public health programs fail because of an inability to implement tested interventions in diverse, complex settings. The field of implementation science is engaged in developing strategies for successful implementation, but current training is primarily researcher-focused. To tackle the challenges of the twenty-first century, public health leaders are promoting a new model titled Public Health 3.0 where public health practitioners become “chief health strategists” and develop interdisciplinary skills for multisector engagement to achieve impact. This requires broad training for public health practitioners in implementation science that includes the allied fields of systems and design thinking, quality improvement, and innovative evaluation methods. At UNC Chapel Hill’s Gillings School of Global Public Health, we created an interdisciplinary set of courses in applied implementation science for Master of Public Health (MPH) students and public health practitioners. We describe our rationale, conceptual approach, pedagogy, courses, and initial results to assist other schools contemplating similar programs. METHODS: Our conceptual approach recognized the vital relationship between implementation research and practice. We conducted a literature review of thought leaders in public health to identify skill areas related to implementation science that are priorities for the future workforce. We also reviewed currently available training programs in implementation science to understand their scope and objectives and to assess whether any of these would be a fit for these priorities. We used a design focused implementation framework to create four linked courses drawing from multiple fields such as engineering, management, and the social sciences and emphasizing application through case studies. We validated the course content by mapping them to implementation science competencies in the literature. RESULTS: To date, there is no other program that provides comprehensive interdisciplinary skills in applied implementation science for MPH students. As of April 2018, we have offered a total of eleven sections of the four courses, with a total enrollment of 142, of whom 127 have been master’s-level students in the school of public health. Using Kirkpatrick’s Model, we found positive student reaction, learning, and behavior. Many students have completed applied implementation science focused practicums, master’s papers, and special studies. CONCLUSIONS: A systematically designed interdisciplinary curriculum in applied implementation science for MPH students has been found by students to be a useful set of skills. Students have demonstrated the capability to master this material and incorporate it into their practicums and master’s papers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-019-0866-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6396520/ /pubmed/30819223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0866-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ramaswamy, Rohit
Mosnier, Joe
Reed, Kristin
Powell, Byron J.
Schenck, Anna P.
Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum
title Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum
title_full Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum
title_fullStr Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum
title_full_unstemmed Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum
title_short Building capacity for Public Health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an MPH curriculum
title_sort building capacity for public health 3.0: introducing implementation science into an mph curriculum
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0866-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ramaswamyrohit buildingcapacityforpublichealth30introducingimplementationscienceintoanmphcurriculum
AT mosnierjoe buildingcapacityforpublichealth30introducingimplementationscienceintoanmphcurriculum
AT reedkristin buildingcapacityforpublichealth30introducingimplementationscienceintoanmphcurriculum
AT powellbyronj buildingcapacityforpublichealth30introducingimplementationscienceintoanmphcurriculum
AT schenckannap buildingcapacityforpublichealth30introducingimplementationscienceintoanmphcurriculum