Cargando…

Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds

Crude water-extracted pectin (WEP) isolated from creeping fig seeds were mainly fractionated into WEP-0.3 and WEP-0.4 fractions. Fractions were confirmed to be nonstarch, nonreducing sugars, nonpolyphenols and protein-unbounded acidic polysaccharides. Interestingly, a significant difference in solub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ri-si, He, Xiao-hong, Lin, Hong, Liang, Rui-hong, Liang, Lu, Chen, Jun, Liu, Cheng-mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30960143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11010159
_version_ 1783400275947552768
author Wang, Ri-si
He, Xiao-hong
Lin, Hong
Liang, Rui-hong
Liang, Lu
Chen, Jun
Liu, Cheng-mei
author_facet Wang, Ri-si
He, Xiao-hong
Lin, Hong
Liang, Rui-hong
Liang, Lu
Chen, Jun
Liu, Cheng-mei
author_sort Wang, Ri-si
collection PubMed
description Crude water-extracted pectin (WEP) isolated from creeping fig seeds were mainly fractionated into WEP-0.3 and WEP-0.4 fractions. Fractions were confirmed to be nonstarch, nonreducing sugars, nonpolyphenols and protein-unbounded acidic polysaccharides. Interestingly, a significant difference in solubility was found between WEP-0.3 (higher solubility than WEP) and WEP-0.4 (remarkably insoluble), which was consistent with the amorphous and porous sponge-like structure of WEP-0.3 as well as the crystalline and dense rod-like state of WEP-0.4. However, the result of the FT-IR spectra was contradicted by the solubility of WEP-0.4, which possessed the lowest degree of methoxylation and ought to possess the highest solubility. Through mineral analysis, a considerably high content of Ca(2+) was found in WEP-0.4, suggesting that the low solubility of WEP-0.4 was probably attributable to the formation of microgels during dialysis. Therefore, metal divalent cations in the dialysate were suggested to be depleted for the dialysis of low methoxyl pectin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6401943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64019432019-04-02 Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds Wang, Ri-si He, Xiao-hong Lin, Hong Liang, Rui-hong Liang, Lu Chen, Jun Liu, Cheng-mei Polymers (Basel) Article Crude water-extracted pectin (WEP) isolated from creeping fig seeds were mainly fractionated into WEP-0.3 and WEP-0.4 fractions. Fractions were confirmed to be nonstarch, nonreducing sugars, nonpolyphenols and protein-unbounded acidic polysaccharides. Interestingly, a significant difference in solubility was found between WEP-0.3 (higher solubility than WEP) and WEP-0.4 (remarkably insoluble), which was consistent with the amorphous and porous sponge-like structure of WEP-0.3 as well as the crystalline and dense rod-like state of WEP-0.4. However, the result of the FT-IR spectra was contradicted by the solubility of WEP-0.4, which possessed the lowest degree of methoxylation and ought to possess the highest solubility. Through mineral analysis, a considerably high content of Ca(2+) was found in WEP-0.4, suggesting that the low solubility of WEP-0.4 was probably attributable to the formation of microgels during dialysis. Therefore, metal divalent cations in the dialysate were suggested to be depleted for the dialysis of low methoxyl pectin. MDPI 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6401943/ /pubmed/30960143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11010159 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Ri-si
He, Xiao-hong
Lin, Hong
Liang, Rui-hong
Liang, Lu
Chen, Jun
Liu, Cheng-mei
Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds
title Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds
title_full Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds
title_fullStr Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds
title_full_unstemmed Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds
title_short Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds
title_sort solubility difference between pectic fractions from creeping fig seeds
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30960143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11010159
work_keys_str_mv AT wangrisi solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds
AT hexiaohong solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds
AT linhong solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds
AT liangruihong solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds
AT lianglu solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds
AT chenjun solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds
AT liuchengmei solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds