Cargando…
Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds
Crude water-extracted pectin (WEP) isolated from creeping fig seeds were mainly fractionated into WEP-0.3 and WEP-0.4 fractions. Fractions were confirmed to be nonstarch, nonreducing sugars, nonpolyphenols and protein-unbounded acidic polysaccharides. Interestingly, a significant difference in solub...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30960143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11010159 |
_version_ | 1783400275947552768 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Ri-si He, Xiao-hong Lin, Hong Liang, Rui-hong Liang, Lu Chen, Jun Liu, Cheng-mei |
author_facet | Wang, Ri-si He, Xiao-hong Lin, Hong Liang, Rui-hong Liang, Lu Chen, Jun Liu, Cheng-mei |
author_sort | Wang, Ri-si |
collection | PubMed |
description | Crude water-extracted pectin (WEP) isolated from creeping fig seeds were mainly fractionated into WEP-0.3 and WEP-0.4 fractions. Fractions were confirmed to be nonstarch, nonreducing sugars, nonpolyphenols and protein-unbounded acidic polysaccharides. Interestingly, a significant difference in solubility was found between WEP-0.3 (higher solubility than WEP) and WEP-0.4 (remarkably insoluble), which was consistent with the amorphous and porous sponge-like structure of WEP-0.3 as well as the crystalline and dense rod-like state of WEP-0.4. However, the result of the FT-IR spectra was contradicted by the solubility of WEP-0.4, which possessed the lowest degree of methoxylation and ought to possess the highest solubility. Through mineral analysis, a considerably high content of Ca(2+) was found in WEP-0.4, suggesting that the low solubility of WEP-0.4 was probably attributable to the formation of microgels during dialysis. Therefore, metal divalent cations in the dialysate were suggested to be depleted for the dialysis of low methoxyl pectin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6401943 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64019432019-04-02 Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds Wang, Ri-si He, Xiao-hong Lin, Hong Liang, Rui-hong Liang, Lu Chen, Jun Liu, Cheng-mei Polymers (Basel) Article Crude water-extracted pectin (WEP) isolated from creeping fig seeds were mainly fractionated into WEP-0.3 and WEP-0.4 fractions. Fractions were confirmed to be nonstarch, nonreducing sugars, nonpolyphenols and protein-unbounded acidic polysaccharides. Interestingly, a significant difference in solubility was found between WEP-0.3 (higher solubility than WEP) and WEP-0.4 (remarkably insoluble), which was consistent with the amorphous and porous sponge-like structure of WEP-0.3 as well as the crystalline and dense rod-like state of WEP-0.4. However, the result of the FT-IR spectra was contradicted by the solubility of WEP-0.4, which possessed the lowest degree of methoxylation and ought to possess the highest solubility. Through mineral analysis, a considerably high content of Ca(2+) was found in WEP-0.4, suggesting that the low solubility of WEP-0.4 was probably attributable to the formation of microgels during dialysis. Therefore, metal divalent cations in the dialysate were suggested to be depleted for the dialysis of low methoxyl pectin. MDPI 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6401943/ /pubmed/30960143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11010159 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Ri-si He, Xiao-hong Lin, Hong Liang, Rui-hong Liang, Lu Chen, Jun Liu, Cheng-mei Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds |
title | Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds |
title_full | Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds |
title_fullStr | Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds |
title_full_unstemmed | Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds |
title_short | Solubility Difference between Pectic Fractions from Creeping Fig Seeds |
title_sort | solubility difference between pectic fractions from creeping fig seeds |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6401943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30960143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11010159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangrisi solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds AT hexiaohong solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds AT linhong solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds AT liangruihong solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds AT lianglu solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds AT chenjun solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds AT liuchengmei solubilitydifferencebetweenpecticfractionsfromcreepingfigseeds |