Cargando…

Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat

The present research combines real data and parameters found in recent literature that were used to design realistic scenarios demonstrating the potential effects (benefits and costs) of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s risk communication regarding the consumption of processed meat, which was p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zec, Slavica, Minto, Clara, Agostoni, Carlo, Fano, Carolina, Ocagli, Honoria, Lorenzoni, Giulia, Gregori, Dario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30769854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020400
_version_ 1783402782091378688
author Zec, Slavica
Minto, Clara
Agostoni, Carlo
Fano, Carolina
Ocagli, Honoria
Lorenzoni, Giulia
Gregori, Dario
author_facet Zec, Slavica
Minto, Clara
Agostoni, Carlo
Fano, Carolina
Ocagli, Honoria
Lorenzoni, Giulia
Gregori, Dario
author_sort Zec, Slavica
collection PubMed
description The present research combines real data and parameters found in recent literature that were used to design realistic scenarios demonstrating the potential effects (benefits and costs) of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s risk communication regarding the consumption of processed meat, which was proven to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)/WHO report. The impact of the risk communication of processed meat consumption was simulated using Monte Carlo microsimulation models. The results showed that a 1% reduction in the number of high-level processed meat consumers may lead to a yearly decrease in CRC cases of 406.43 (IC 95%: −243.94, 1056.81), while the more extreme scenario of a 15% reduction may lead to 2086.62 fewer cases (IC 95%: 1426.66, 2746.57). On the other hand, if demand contraction in the processed meat sector resulted in a 0.1% loss in employment, one could expect 27.23 all-cause mortalities attributable to job loss (IC 95%: 16.55, 37.80). This simulation study demonstrates that caution should be taken when implementing public awareness campaigns, particularly when the prevention message is not straightforward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6413201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64132012019-03-29 Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat Zec, Slavica Minto, Clara Agostoni, Carlo Fano, Carolina Ocagli, Honoria Lorenzoni, Giulia Gregori, Dario Nutrients Article The present research combines real data and parameters found in recent literature that were used to design realistic scenarios demonstrating the potential effects (benefits and costs) of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s risk communication regarding the consumption of processed meat, which was proven to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)/WHO report. The impact of the risk communication of processed meat consumption was simulated using Monte Carlo microsimulation models. The results showed that a 1% reduction in the number of high-level processed meat consumers may lead to a yearly decrease in CRC cases of 406.43 (IC 95%: −243.94, 1056.81), while the more extreme scenario of a 15% reduction may lead to 2086.62 fewer cases (IC 95%: 1426.66, 2746.57). On the other hand, if demand contraction in the processed meat sector resulted in a 0.1% loss in employment, one could expect 27.23 all-cause mortalities attributable to job loss (IC 95%: 16.55, 37.80). This simulation study demonstrates that caution should be taken when implementing public awareness campaigns, particularly when the prevention message is not straightforward. MDPI 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6413201/ /pubmed/30769854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020400 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zec, Slavica
Minto, Clara
Agostoni, Carlo
Fano, Carolina
Ocagli, Honoria
Lorenzoni, Giulia
Gregori, Dario
Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat
title Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat
title_full Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat
title_fullStr Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat
title_full_unstemmed Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat
title_short Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat
title_sort communicating risk regarding food consumption: the case of processed meat
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30769854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020400
work_keys_str_mv AT zecslavica communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat
AT mintoclara communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat
AT agostonicarlo communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat
AT fanocarolina communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat
AT ocaglihonoria communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat
AT lorenzonigiulia communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat
AT gregoridario communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat