Cargando…
Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat
The present research combines real data and parameters found in recent literature that were used to design realistic scenarios demonstrating the potential effects (benefits and costs) of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s risk communication regarding the consumption of processed meat, which was p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30769854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020400 |
_version_ | 1783402782091378688 |
---|---|
author | Zec, Slavica Minto, Clara Agostoni, Carlo Fano, Carolina Ocagli, Honoria Lorenzoni, Giulia Gregori, Dario |
author_facet | Zec, Slavica Minto, Clara Agostoni, Carlo Fano, Carolina Ocagli, Honoria Lorenzoni, Giulia Gregori, Dario |
author_sort | Zec, Slavica |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present research combines real data and parameters found in recent literature that were used to design realistic scenarios demonstrating the potential effects (benefits and costs) of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s risk communication regarding the consumption of processed meat, which was proven to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)/WHO report. The impact of the risk communication of processed meat consumption was simulated using Monte Carlo microsimulation models. The results showed that a 1% reduction in the number of high-level processed meat consumers may lead to a yearly decrease in CRC cases of 406.43 (IC 95%: −243.94, 1056.81), while the more extreme scenario of a 15% reduction may lead to 2086.62 fewer cases (IC 95%: 1426.66, 2746.57). On the other hand, if demand contraction in the processed meat sector resulted in a 0.1% loss in employment, one could expect 27.23 all-cause mortalities attributable to job loss (IC 95%: 16.55, 37.80). This simulation study demonstrates that caution should be taken when implementing public awareness campaigns, particularly when the prevention message is not straightforward. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6413201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64132012019-03-29 Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat Zec, Slavica Minto, Clara Agostoni, Carlo Fano, Carolina Ocagli, Honoria Lorenzoni, Giulia Gregori, Dario Nutrients Article The present research combines real data and parameters found in recent literature that were used to design realistic scenarios demonstrating the potential effects (benefits and costs) of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s risk communication regarding the consumption of processed meat, which was proven to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)/WHO report. The impact of the risk communication of processed meat consumption was simulated using Monte Carlo microsimulation models. The results showed that a 1% reduction in the number of high-level processed meat consumers may lead to a yearly decrease in CRC cases of 406.43 (IC 95%: −243.94, 1056.81), while the more extreme scenario of a 15% reduction may lead to 2086.62 fewer cases (IC 95%: 1426.66, 2746.57). On the other hand, if demand contraction in the processed meat sector resulted in a 0.1% loss in employment, one could expect 27.23 all-cause mortalities attributable to job loss (IC 95%: 16.55, 37.80). This simulation study demonstrates that caution should be taken when implementing public awareness campaigns, particularly when the prevention message is not straightforward. MDPI 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6413201/ /pubmed/30769854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020400 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zec, Slavica Minto, Clara Agostoni, Carlo Fano, Carolina Ocagli, Honoria Lorenzoni, Giulia Gregori, Dario Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat |
title | Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat |
title_full | Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat |
title_fullStr | Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat |
title_full_unstemmed | Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat |
title_short | Communicating Risk Regarding Food Consumption: The Case of Processed Meat |
title_sort | communicating risk regarding food consumption: the case of processed meat |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30769854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zecslavica communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat AT mintoclara communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat AT agostonicarlo communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat AT fanocarolina communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat AT ocaglihonoria communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat AT lorenzonigiulia communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat AT gregoridario communicatingriskregardingfoodconsumptionthecaseofprocessedmeat |