Cargando…

Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton’s jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation

Variability among donors, non-standardized methods for isolation, and characterization contribute to mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) heterogeneity. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSCs)-derived MSCs would circumvent many of current issues and enable large-scale production of standardized cellula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devito, Liani, Klontzas, Michail E., Cvoro, Aleksandra, Galleu, Antonio, Simon, Marisa, Hobbs, Carl, Dazzi, Francesco, Mantalaris, Athanasios, Khalaf, Yacoub, Ilic, Dusko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-1498-0
_version_ 1783405113945096192
author Devito, Liani
Klontzas, Michail E.
Cvoro, Aleksandra
Galleu, Antonio
Simon, Marisa
Hobbs, Carl
Dazzi, Francesco
Mantalaris, Athanasios
Khalaf, Yacoub
Ilic, Dusko
author_facet Devito, Liani
Klontzas, Michail E.
Cvoro, Aleksandra
Galleu, Antonio
Simon, Marisa
Hobbs, Carl
Dazzi, Francesco
Mantalaris, Athanasios
Khalaf, Yacoub
Ilic, Dusko
author_sort Devito, Liani
collection PubMed
description Variability among donors, non-standardized methods for isolation, and characterization contribute to mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) heterogeneity. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSCs)-derived MSCs would circumvent many of current issues and enable large-scale production of standardized cellular therapy. To explore differences between native MSCs (nMSCs) and iPSC-derived MSCs (iMSCs), we developed isogeneic lines from Wharton’s jelly (WJ) from the umbilical cords of two donors (#12 and #13) under xeno-free conditions. Next, we reprogrammed them into iPSCs (iPSC12 and iPSC13) and subsequently differentiated them back into iMSCs (iMSC12 and iMSC13) using two different protocols, which we named ARG and TEX. We assessed their differentiation capability, transcriptome, immunomodulatory potential, and interferon-γ (IFNG)-induced changes in metabolome. Our data demonstrated that although both differentiation protocols yield iMSCs similar to their parental nMSCs, there are substantial differences. The ARG protocol resulted in iMSCs with a strong immunomodulatory potential and lower plasticity and proliferation rate, whereas the TEX protocol raised iMSCs with a higher proliferation rate, better differentiation potential, though weak immunomodulatory response. Our data suggest that, following a careful selection and screening of donors, nMSCs from umbilical’s cord WJ can be easily reprogrammed into iPSCs, providing an unlimited source of material for differentiation into iMSCs. However, the differentiation protocol should be chosen depending on their clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6426992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64269922019-03-21 Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton’s jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation Devito, Liani Klontzas, Michail E. Cvoro, Aleksandra Galleu, Antonio Simon, Marisa Hobbs, Carl Dazzi, Francesco Mantalaris, Athanasios Khalaf, Yacoub Ilic, Dusko Cell Death Dis Article Variability among donors, non-standardized methods for isolation, and characterization contribute to mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) heterogeneity. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSCs)-derived MSCs would circumvent many of current issues and enable large-scale production of standardized cellular therapy. To explore differences between native MSCs (nMSCs) and iPSC-derived MSCs (iMSCs), we developed isogeneic lines from Wharton’s jelly (WJ) from the umbilical cords of two donors (#12 and #13) under xeno-free conditions. Next, we reprogrammed them into iPSCs (iPSC12 and iPSC13) and subsequently differentiated them back into iMSCs (iMSC12 and iMSC13) using two different protocols, which we named ARG and TEX. We assessed their differentiation capability, transcriptome, immunomodulatory potential, and interferon-γ (IFNG)-induced changes in metabolome. Our data demonstrated that although both differentiation protocols yield iMSCs similar to their parental nMSCs, there are substantial differences. The ARG protocol resulted in iMSCs with a strong immunomodulatory potential and lower plasticity and proliferation rate, whereas the TEX protocol raised iMSCs with a higher proliferation rate, better differentiation potential, though weak immunomodulatory response. Our data suggest that, following a careful selection and screening of donors, nMSCs from umbilical’s cord WJ can be easily reprogrammed into iPSCs, providing an unlimited source of material for differentiation into iMSCs. However, the differentiation protocol should be chosen depending on their clinical use. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6426992/ /pubmed/30894508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-1498-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Devito, Liani
Klontzas, Michail E.
Cvoro, Aleksandra
Galleu, Antonio
Simon, Marisa
Hobbs, Carl
Dazzi, Francesco
Mantalaris, Athanasios
Khalaf, Yacoub
Ilic, Dusko
Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton’s jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation
title Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton’s jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation
title_full Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton’s jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation
title_fullStr Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton’s jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton’s jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation
title_short Comparison of human isogeneic Wharton’s jelly MSCs and iPSC-derived MSCs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to IFNG stimulation
title_sort comparison of human isogeneic wharton’s jelly mscs and ipsc-derived mscs reveals differentiation-dependent metabolic responses to ifng stimulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-1498-0
work_keys_str_mv AT devitoliani comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation
AT klontzasmichaile comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation
AT cvoroaleksandra comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation
AT galleuantonio comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation
AT simonmarisa comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation
AT hobbscarl comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation
AT dazzifrancesco comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation
AT mantalarisathanasios comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation
AT khalafyacoub comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation
AT ilicdusko comparisonofhumanisogeneicwhartonsjellymscsandipscderivedmscsrevealsdifferentiationdependentmetabolicresponsestoifngstimulation