Cargando…

Cross-Species Analysis of Glycosaminoglycan Binding Proteins Reveals Some Animal Models Are “More Equal” than Others

Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) mimetics are synthetic or semi-synthetic analogues of heparin or heparan sulfate, which are designed to interact with GAG binding sites on proteins. The preclinical stages of drug development rely on efficacy and toxicity assessment in animals and aim to apply these findings...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boittier, Eric D., Gandhi, Neha S., Ferro, Vito, Coombe, Deirdre R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30845788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050924
_version_ 1783405611779620864
author Boittier, Eric D.
Gandhi, Neha S.
Ferro, Vito
Coombe, Deirdre R.
author_facet Boittier, Eric D.
Gandhi, Neha S.
Ferro, Vito
Coombe, Deirdre R.
author_sort Boittier, Eric D.
collection PubMed
description Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) mimetics are synthetic or semi-synthetic analogues of heparin or heparan sulfate, which are designed to interact with GAG binding sites on proteins. The preclinical stages of drug development rely on efficacy and toxicity assessment in animals and aim to apply these findings to clinical studies. However, such data may not always reflect the human situation possibly because the GAG binding site on the protein ligand in animals and humans could differ. Possible inter-species differences in the GAG-binding sites on antithrombin III, heparanase, and chemokines of the CCL and CXCL families were examined by sequence alignments, molecular modelling and assessment of surface electrostatic potentials to determine if one species of laboratory animal is likely to result in more clinically relevant data than another. For each protein, current understanding of GAG binding is reviewed from a protein structure and function perspective. This combinatorial analysis shows chemokine dimers and oligomers can present different GAG binding surfaces for the same target protein, whereas a cleft-like GAG binding site will differently influence the types of GAG structures that bind and the species preferable for preclinical work. Such analyses will allow an informed choice of animal(s) for preclinical studies of GAG mimetic drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6429508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64295082019-04-15 Cross-Species Analysis of Glycosaminoglycan Binding Proteins Reveals Some Animal Models Are “More Equal” than Others Boittier, Eric D. Gandhi, Neha S. Ferro, Vito Coombe, Deirdre R. Molecules Review Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) mimetics are synthetic or semi-synthetic analogues of heparin or heparan sulfate, which are designed to interact with GAG binding sites on proteins. The preclinical stages of drug development rely on efficacy and toxicity assessment in animals and aim to apply these findings to clinical studies. However, such data may not always reflect the human situation possibly because the GAG binding site on the protein ligand in animals and humans could differ. Possible inter-species differences in the GAG-binding sites on antithrombin III, heparanase, and chemokines of the CCL and CXCL families were examined by sequence alignments, molecular modelling and assessment of surface electrostatic potentials to determine if one species of laboratory animal is likely to result in more clinically relevant data than another. For each protein, current understanding of GAG binding is reviewed from a protein structure and function perspective. This combinatorial analysis shows chemokine dimers and oligomers can present different GAG binding surfaces for the same target protein, whereas a cleft-like GAG binding site will differently influence the types of GAG structures that bind and the species preferable for preclinical work. Such analyses will allow an informed choice of animal(s) for preclinical studies of GAG mimetic drugs. MDPI 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6429508/ /pubmed/30845788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050924 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Boittier, Eric D.
Gandhi, Neha S.
Ferro, Vito
Coombe, Deirdre R.
Cross-Species Analysis of Glycosaminoglycan Binding Proteins Reveals Some Animal Models Are “More Equal” than Others
title Cross-Species Analysis of Glycosaminoglycan Binding Proteins Reveals Some Animal Models Are “More Equal” than Others
title_full Cross-Species Analysis of Glycosaminoglycan Binding Proteins Reveals Some Animal Models Are “More Equal” than Others
title_fullStr Cross-Species Analysis of Glycosaminoglycan Binding Proteins Reveals Some Animal Models Are “More Equal” than Others
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Species Analysis of Glycosaminoglycan Binding Proteins Reveals Some Animal Models Are “More Equal” than Others
title_short Cross-Species Analysis of Glycosaminoglycan Binding Proteins Reveals Some Animal Models Are “More Equal” than Others
title_sort cross-species analysis of glycosaminoglycan binding proteins reveals some animal models are “more equal” than others
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30845788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050924
work_keys_str_mv AT boittierericd crossspeciesanalysisofglycosaminoglycanbindingproteinsrevealssomeanimalmodelsaremoreequalthanothers
AT gandhinehas crossspeciesanalysisofglycosaminoglycanbindingproteinsrevealssomeanimalmodelsaremoreequalthanothers
AT ferrovito crossspeciesanalysisofglycosaminoglycanbindingproteinsrevealssomeanimalmodelsaremoreequalthanothers
AT coombedeirdrer crossspeciesanalysisofglycosaminoglycanbindingproteinsrevealssomeanimalmodelsaremoreequalthanothers