Cargando…

Comparing DNA quantity and quality using saliva collection following food and beverage consumption

OBJECTIVE: With the democratization of genetic testing, researchers, clinicians, and educators must consider the varying degree of field conditions when collecting samples for genetic analyses. For genotyping or sequencing studies, study designers have multiple options from which to choose, includin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Summer R., Chapleau, Richard R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30904022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4211-6
_version_ 1783405879320641536
author Hughes, Summer R.
Chapleau, Richard R.
author_facet Hughes, Summer R.
Chapleau, Richard R.
author_sort Hughes, Summer R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: With the democratization of genetic testing, researchers, clinicians, and educators must consider the varying degree of field conditions when collecting samples for genetic analyses. For genotyping or sequencing studies, study designers have multiple options from which to choose, including cheek swabs and saliva sampling. One significant benefit of saliva collection is that it can be done remotely, in the privacy of one’s home. This same benefit adds a risk of compliance. Therefore, our goal with this study was to see if the quality and quantity of the saliva collection by a saliva DNA collection kit would be affected by not following the manufacturer’s directions, i.e., drinking or eating right before collection. RESULTS: We asked five participants to collect saliva samples according to the manufacturer’s guidance and also after consuming five food items or beverages. We evaluated DNA quantity and quality post-purification using spectroscopy, electrophoresis, and polymerase chain reaction genotyping. Consistent with our hypothesis, we did not see a difference in quantity or quality of the isolated DNA. From our results, we conclude that the manufacturer’s instructions serve as an ideal guideline, but the collection devices are robust enough to permit flexibility in sampling at home or in the field. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-019-4211-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6431066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64310662019-04-04 Comparing DNA quantity and quality using saliva collection following food and beverage consumption Hughes, Summer R. Chapleau, Richard R. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: With the democratization of genetic testing, researchers, clinicians, and educators must consider the varying degree of field conditions when collecting samples for genetic analyses. For genotyping or sequencing studies, study designers have multiple options from which to choose, including cheek swabs and saliva sampling. One significant benefit of saliva collection is that it can be done remotely, in the privacy of one’s home. This same benefit adds a risk of compliance. Therefore, our goal with this study was to see if the quality and quantity of the saliva collection by a saliva DNA collection kit would be affected by not following the manufacturer’s directions, i.e., drinking or eating right before collection. RESULTS: We asked five participants to collect saliva samples according to the manufacturer’s guidance and also after consuming five food items or beverages. We evaluated DNA quantity and quality post-purification using spectroscopy, electrophoresis, and polymerase chain reaction genotyping. Consistent with our hypothesis, we did not see a difference in quantity or quality of the isolated DNA. From our results, we conclude that the manufacturer’s instructions serve as an ideal guideline, but the collection devices are robust enough to permit flexibility in sampling at home or in the field. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-019-4211-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6431066/ /pubmed/30904022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4211-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Hughes, Summer R.
Chapleau, Richard R.
Comparing DNA quantity and quality using saliva collection following food and beverage consumption
title Comparing DNA quantity and quality using saliva collection following food and beverage consumption
title_full Comparing DNA quantity and quality using saliva collection following food and beverage consumption
title_fullStr Comparing DNA quantity and quality using saliva collection following food and beverage consumption
title_full_unstemmed Comparing DNA quantity and quality using saliva collection following food and beverage consumption
title_short Comparing DNA quantity and quality using saliva collection following food and beverage consumption
title_sort comparing dna quantity and quality using saliva collection following food and beverage consumption
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30904022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4211-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hughessummerr comparingdnaquantityandqualityusingsalivacollectionfollowingfoodandbeverageconsumption
AT chapleaurichardr comparingdnaquantityandqualityusingsalivacollectionfollowingfoodandbeverageconsumption