Cargando…

Elimination of bacterial DNA during RNA isolation from sputum: Bashing bead vortexing is preferable over prolonged DNase treatment

Sputum often contains large amounts of contaminating bacterial DNA that, if not eliminated during RNA isolation, may interfere with gene expression studies. During RNA isolation only repeated DNase treatment can effectively remove contaminating bacterial DNA from samples, but this compromises RNA qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paska, Csilla, Barta, Imre, Drozdovszky, Orsolya, Antus, Balazs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214609
_version_ 1783407108534829056
author Paska, Csilla
Barta, Imre
Drozdovszky, Orsolya
Antus, Balazs
author_facet Paska, Csilla
Barta, Imre
Drozdovszky, Orsolya
Antus, Balazs
author_sort Paska, Csilla
collection PubMed
description Sputum often contains large amounts of contaminating bacterial DNA that, if not eliminated during RNA isolation, may interfere with gene expression studies. During RNA isolation only repeated DNase treatment can effectively remove contaminating bacterial DNA from samples, but this compromises RNA quality. In this study we tested alternative methods to facilitate the removal of DNA and improve the quality of RNA obtained. Sputum samples obtained from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were processed with dithiothreitol and subjected to various RNA isolation methods, yet with modified protocols. Modifications included prolonged DNase treatment or vortexing of sputum cells in the presence of beads prior to RNA isolation. Bacterial DNA contamination was tested by PCR using universal bacterial primers, while RNA quality was assessed by real-time PCR using GAPDH primers for amplicons of different length. We found that the RNeasy Plus Mini kit equipped with the gDNA eliminator spin column was able to completely eliminate bacterial DNA, if sputum cells were lysed in the presence of bashing beads. Notably, compared with the standard protocol, the modified procedure yielded better quality RNA as well, as indicated by improved threshold profiles of qPCR. Bead vortexing of cells was less effective when combined with other RNA isolation methods, and the repeated DNase treatment needed to completely remove contaminating DNA from the samples reduced the quality of RNA markedly. Bead vortexing in combination with certain RNA extraction methods greatly facilitates the isolation of sputum RNA that is free of contaminating bacterial DNA, and is suitable for downstream applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6438495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64384952019-04-12 Elimination of bacterial DNA during RNA isolation from sputum: Bashing bead vortexing is preferable over prolonged DNase treatment Paska, Csilla Barta, Imre Drozdovszky, Orsolya Antus, Balazs PLoS One Research Article Sputum often contains large amounts of contaminating bacterial DNA that, if not eliminated during RNA isolation, may interfere with gene expression studies. During RNA isolation only repeated DNase treatment can effectively remove contaminating bacterial DNA from samples, but this compromises RNA quality. In this study we tested alternative methods to facilitate the removal of DNA and improve the quality of RNA obtained. Sputum samples obtained from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were processed with dithiothreitol and subjected to various RNA isolation methods, yet with modified protocols. Modifications included prolonged DNase treatment or vortexing of sputum cells in the presence of beads prior to RNA isolation. Bacterial DNA contamination was tested by PCR using universal bacterial primers, while RNA quality was assessed by real-time PCR using GAPDH primers for amplicons of different length. We found that the RNeasy Plus Mini kit equipped with the gDNA eliminator spin column was able to completely eliminate bacterial DNA, if sputum cells were lysed in the presence of bashing beads. Notably, compared with the standard protocol, the modified procedure yielded better quality RNA as well, as indicated by improved threshold profiles of qPCR. Bead vortexing of cells was less effective when combined with other RNA isolation methods, and the repeated DNase treatment needed to completely remove contaminating DNA from the samples reduced the quality of RNA markedly. Bead vortexing in combination with certain RNA extraction methods greatly facilitates the isolation of sputum RNA that is free of contaminating bacterial DNA, and is suitable for downstream applications. Public Library of Science 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6438495/ /pubmed/30921416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214609 Text en © 2019 Paska et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paska, Csilla
Barta, Imre
Drozdovszky, Orsolya
Antus, Balazs
Elimination of bacterial DNA during RNA isolation from sputum: Bashing bead vortexing is preferable over prolonged DNase treatment
title Elimination of bacterial DNA during RNA isolation from sputum: Bashing bead vortexing is preferable over prolonged DNase treatment
title_full Elimination of bacterial DNA during RNA isolation from sputum: Bashing bead vortexing is preferable over prolonged DNase treatment
title_fullStr Elimination of bacterial DNA during RNA isolation from sputum: Bashing bead vortexing is preferable over prolonged DNase treatment
title_full_unstemmed Elimination of bacterial DNA during RNA isolation from sputum: Bashing bead vortexing is preferable over prolonged DNase treatment
title_short Elimination of bacterial DNA during RNA isolation from sputum: Bashing bead vortexing is preferable over prolonged DNase treatment
title_sort elimination of bacterial dna during rna isolation from sputum: bashing bead vortexing is preferable over prolonged dnase treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214609
work_keys_str_mv AT paskacsilla eliminationofbacterialdnaduringrnaisolationfromsputumbashingbeadvortexingispreferableoverprolongeddnasetreatment
AT bartaimre eliminationofbacterialdnaduringrnaisolationfromsputumbashingbeadvortexingispreferableoverprolongeddnasetreatment
AT drozdovszkyorsolya eliminationofbacterialdnaduringrnaisolationfromsputumbashingbeadvortexingispreferableoverprolongeddnasetreatment
AT antusbalazs eliminationofbacterialdnaduringrnaisolationfromsputumbashingbeadvortexingispreferableoverprolongeddnasetreatment