Cargando…

Stress and stressors of medical student near-peer tutors during courses: a psychophysiological mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Structured peer-led tutorial courses are widespread and indispensable teaching methods that relieve teaching staff and contribute to the development of students’ competencies. Nevertheless, despite high general stress levels in medical students and associated increases in psychopathology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hundertmark, Jan, Alvarez, Simone, Loukanova, Svetla, Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1521-2
_version_ 1783408058061291520
author Hundertmark, Jan
Alvarez, Simone
Loukanova, Svetla
Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik
author_facet Hundertmark, Jan
Alvarez, Simone
Loukanova, Svetla
Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik
author_sort Hundertmark, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Structured peer-led tutorial courses are widespread and indispensable teaching methods that relieve teaching staff and contribute to the development of students’ competencies. Nevertheless, despite high general stress levels in medical students and associated increases in psychopathology, specific knowledge of peer tutors’ additional burdens is very limited. METHODS: Sixty student near-peer tutors from two structured peer-teaching programmes volunteered to participate. On multiple occasions in three different course sessions, we assessed tutors’ subjective stress, affective state, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol. Additionally, tutors named everyday and course-specific stressors, which were evaluated by means of content analyses. RESULTS: The study participation rate was high (63% of all active tutors). The participating tutors are socially well adapted and resilient individuals. They report a variety of stressors such as time pressure, participant characteristics, teacher role demands, and study requirements, but nevertheless display only moderate psychological and physiological stress that decreases over sessions. Tutors’ negative affect in sessions is low; their positive affect is consistently high for senior as well as novice tutors. Tutors rate their courses’ quality as high and quickly recover after sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Tutors successfully cope with teaching-associated and everyday life demands. The results corroborate the viability and success of current peer-teaching programmes from the tutors’ perspective. This study is the first to comprehensively quantify tutors’ stress and describe frequent stressors, thus contributing to the development of better peer teaching programmes and tutor qualification training. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1521-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6444608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64446082019-04-11 Stress and stressors of medical student near-peer tutors during courses: a psychophysiological mixed methods study Hundertmark, Jan Alvarez, Simone Loukanova, Svetla Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Structured peer-led tutorial courses are widespread and indispensable teaching methods that relieve teaching staff and contribute to the development of students’ competencies. Nevertheless, despite high general stress levels in medical students and associated increases in psychopathology, specific knowledge of peer tutors’ additional burdens is very limited. METHODS: Sixty student near-peer tutors from two structured peer-teaching programmes volunteered to participate. On multiple occasions in three different course sessions, we assessed tutors’ subjective stress, affective state, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol. Additionally, tutors named everyday and course-specific stressors, which were evaluated by means of content analyses. RESULTS: The study participation rate was high (63% of all active tutors). The participating tutors are socially well adapted and resilient individuals. They report a variety of stressors such as time pressure, participant characteristics, teacher role demands, and study requirements, but nevertheless display only moderate psychological and physiological stress that decreases over sessions. Tutors’ negative affect in sessions is low; their positive affect is consistently high for senior as well as novice tutors. Tutors rate their courses’ quality as high and quickly recover after sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Tutors successfully cope with teaching-associated and everyday life demands. The results corroborate the viability and success of current peer-teaching programmes from the tutors’ perspective. This study is the first to comprehensively quantify tutors’ stress and describe frequent stressors, thus contributing to the development of better peer teaching programmes and tutor qualification training. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1521-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6444608/ /pubmed/30940106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1521-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hundertmark, Jan
Alvarez, Simone
Loukanova, Svetla
Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik
Stress and stressors of medical student near-peer tutors during courses: a psychophysiological mixed methods study
title Stress and stressors of medical student near-peer tutors during courses: a psychophysiological mixed methods study
title_full Stress and stressors of medical student near-peer tutors during courses: a psychophysiological mixed methods study
title_fullStr Stress and stressors of medical student near-peer tutors during courses: a psychophysiological mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Stress and stressors of medical student near-peer tutors during courses: a psychophysiological mixed methods study
title_short Stress and stressors of medical student near-peer tutors during courses: a psychophysiological mixed methods study
title_sort stress and stressors of medical student near-peer tutors during courses: a psychophysiological mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1521-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hundertmarkjan stressandstressorsofmedicalstudentnearpeertutorsduringcoursesapsychophysiologicalmixedmethodsstudy
AT alvarezsimone stressandstressorsofmedicalstudentnearpeertutorsduringcoursesapsychophysiologicalmixedmethodsstudy
AT loukanovasvetla stressandstressorsofmedicalstudentnearpeertutorsduringcoursesapsychophysiologicalmixedmethodsstudy
AT schultzjobsthendrik stressandstressorsofmedicalstudentnearpeertutorsduringcoursesapsychophysiologicalmixedmethodsstudy