Cargando…
A single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors
Agonists turn on receptors because they bind more strongly to active (R*) versus resting (R) conformations of their target sites. Here, to explore how agonists activate neuromuscular acetylcholine receptors, we built homology models of R and R* neurotransmitter binding sites, docked ligands to those...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Rockefeller University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30635370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812212 |
_version_ | 1783408222186504192 |
---|---|
author | Tripathy, Sushree Zheng, Wenjun Auerbach, Anthony |
author_facet | Tripathy, Sushree Zheng, Wenjun Auerbach, Anthony |
author_sort | Tripathy, Sushree |
collection | PubMed |
description | Agonists turn on receptors because they bind more strongly to active (R*) versus resting (R) conformations of their target sites. Here, to explore how agonists activate neuromuscular acetylcholine receptors, we built homology models of R and R* neurotransmitter binding sites, docked ligands to those sites, ran molecular dynamics simulations to relax (“equilibrate”) the structures, measured binding site structural parameters, and correlated them with experimental agonist binding energies. Each binding pocket is a pyramid formed by five aromatic amino acids and covered partially by loop C. We found that in R* versus R, loop C is displaced outward, the pocket is smaller and skewed, the agonist orientation is reversed, and a key nitrogen atom in the agonist is closer to the pocket center (distance d(x)) and a tryptophan pair but farther from αY190. Of these differences, the change in d(x) shows the largest correlation with experimental binding energy and provides a good estimate of agonist affinity, efficacy, and efficiency. Indeed, concentration–response curves can be calculated from just d(x) values. The contraction and twist of the binding pocket upon activation resemble gating rearrangements of the extracellular domain of related receptors at a smaller scale. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6445573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64455732019-10-01 A single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors Tripathy, Sushree Zheng, Wenjun Auerbach, Anthony J Gen Physiol Research Articles Agonists turn on receptors because they bind more strongly to active (R*) versus resting (R) conformations of their target sites. Here, to explore how agonists activate neuromuscular acetylcholine receptors, we built homology models of R and R* neurotransmitter binding sites, docked ligands to those sites, ran molecular dynamics simulations to relax (“equilibrate”) the structures, measured binding site structural parameters, and correlated them with experimental agonist binding energies. Each binding pocket is a pyramid formed by five aromatic amino acids and covered partially by loop C. We found that in R* versus R, loop C is displaced outward, the pocket is smaller and skewed, the agonist orientation is reversed, and a key nitrogen atom in the agonist is closer to the pocket center (distance d(x)) and a tryptophan pair but farther from αY190. Of these differences, the change in d(x) shows the largest correlation with experimental binding energy and provides a good estimate of agonist affinity, efficacy, and efficiency. Indeed, concentration–response curves can be calculated from just d(x) values. The contraction and twist of the binding pocket upon activation resemble gating rearrangements of the extracellular domain of related receptors at a smaller scale. Rockefeller University Press 2019-04-01 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6445573/ /pubmed/30635370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812212 Text en © 2019 http://www.rupress.org/termshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms (http://www.rupress.org/terms/) ). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Tripathy, Sushree Zheng, Wenjun Auerbach, Anthony A single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors |
title | A single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors |
title_full | A single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors |
title_fullStr | A single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors |
title_full_unstemmed | A single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors |
title_short | A single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors |
title_sort | single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30635370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tripathysushree asinglemoleculardistancepredictsagonistbindingenergyinnicotinicreceptors AT zhengwenjun asinglemoleculardistancepredictsagonistbindingenergyinnicotinicreceptors AT auerbachanthony asinglemoleculardistancepredictsagonistbindingenergyinnicotinicreceptors AT tripathysushree singlemoleculardistancepredictsagonistbindingenergyinnicotinicreceptors AT zhengwenjun singlemoleculardistancepredictsagonistbindingenergyinnicotinicreceptors AT auerbachanthony singlemoleculardistancepredictsagonistbindingenergyinnicotinicreceptors |