Cargando…

Subjects’ Perception in Quantifying Printed and Digital Photos of Food Portions

Although digital photos have the potential to improve the precision of reported portions in dietary assessment, there are few studies investigating its accuracy in comparison to printed photos. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perception of adults in quantifying food portion sizes using pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nichelle, Pryscila G., Almeida, Claudia C. B., Camey, Suzi A., Garmus, Lenine M., Elias, Vanessa C. M., Marchioni, Dirce M., da Silva, Danielle G., Ocke, Marga C., Slimani, Nadia, Fisberg, Regina M., Crispim, Sandra P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30818798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11030501
_version_ 1783412002050277376
author Nichelle, Pryscila G.
Almeida, Claudia C. B.
Camey, Suzi A.
Garmus, Lenine M.
Elias, Vanessa C. M.
Marchioni, Dirce M.
da Silva, Danielle G.
Ocke, Marga C.
Slimani, Nadia
Fisberg, Regina M.
Crispim, Sandra P.
author_facet Nichelle, Pryscila G.
Almeida, Claudia C. B.
Camey, Suzi A.
Garmus, Lenine M.
Elias, Vanessa C. M.
Marchioni, Dirce M.
da Silva, Danielle G.
Ocke, Marga C.
Slimani, Nadia
Fisberg, Regina M.
Crispim, Sandra P.
author_sort Nichelle, Pryscila G.
collection PubMed
description Although digital photos have the potential to improve the precision of reported portions in dietary assessment, there are few studies investigating its accuracy in comparison to printed photos. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perception of adults in quantifying food portion sizes using printed and digital photos, displayed on computer-screens and tablets. In total, 1165 evaluations were performed for 60 photos of portion sizes in Brazil. Each participant (n = 58) attended two sessions in the study center, with an interval of at least one week. In each session, twelve food portions were prepared and randomly evaluated by each participant in its printed and digital forms. The mean error (difference between the estimated and true portions) was not significantly different between the printed photos (2.1 g ± 47.2) and the digital ones (−6.4 g ± 53.7). The agreement on using the printed and digital photos was 91% and 90%, respectively. Furthermore, the use of the tablet was more prone to underestimation when compared to printed and computer-screen photos (p < 0.001). Overall, participants did not present major difficulties in perceiving the portion sizes using the printed and digital photos, but the use of tablets led to less accurate results, indicating that this needs to be further evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6471321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64713212019-04-25 Subjects’ Perception in Quantifying Printed and Digital Photos of Food Portions Nichelle, Pryscila G. Almeida, Claudia C. B. Camey, Suzi A. Garmus, Lenine M. Elias, Vanessa C. M. Marchioni, Dirce M. da Silva, Danielle G. Ocke, Marga C. Slimani, Nadia Fisberg, Regina M. Crispim, Sandra P. Nutrients Article Although digital photos have the potential to improve the precision of reported portions in dietary assessment, there are few studies investigating its accuracy in comparison to printed photos. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perception of adults in quantifying food portion sizes using printed and digital photos, displayed on computer-screens and tablets. In total, 1165 evaluations were performed for 60 photos of portion sizes in Brazil. Each participant (n = 58) attended two sessions in the study center, with an interval of at least one week. In each session, twelve food portions were prepared and randomly evaluated by each participant in its printed and digital forms. The mean error (difference between the estimated and true portions) was not significantly different between the printed photos (2.1 g ± 47.2) and the digital ones (−6.4 g ± 53.7). The agreement on using the printed and digital photos was 91% and 90%, respectively. Furthermore, the use of the tablet was more prone to underestimation when compared to printed and computer-screen photos (p < 0.001). Overall, participants did not present major difficulties in perceiving the portion sizes using the printed and digital photos, but the use of tablets led to less accurate results, indicating that this needs to be further evaluated. MDPI 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6471321/ /pubmed/30818798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11030501 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nichelle, Pryscila G.
Almeida, Claudia C. B.
Camey, Suzi A.
Garmus, Lenine M.
Elias, Vanessa C. M.
Marchioni, Dirce M.
da Silva, Danielle G.
Ocke, Marga C.
Slimani, Nadia
Fisberg, Regina M.
Crispim, Sandra P.
Subjects’ Perception in Quantifying Printed and Digital Photos of Food Portions
title Subjects’ Perception in Quantifying Printed and Digital Photos of Food Portions
title_full Subjects’ Perception in Quantifying Printed and Digital Photos of Food Portions
title_fullStr Subjects’ Perception in Quantifying Printed and Digital Photos of Food Portions
title_full_unstemmed Subjects’ Perception in Quantifying Printed and Digital Photos of Food Portions
title_short Subjects’ Perception in Quantifying Printed and Digital Photos of Food Portions
title_sort subjects’ perception in quantifying printed and digital photos of food portions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30818798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11030501
work_keys_str_mv AT nichellepryscilag subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT almeidaclaudiacb subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT cameysuzia subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT garmusleninem subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT eliasvanessacm subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT marchionidircem subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT dasilvadanielleg subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT ockemargac subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT slimaninadia subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT fisbergreginam subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions
AT crispimsandrap subjectsperceptioninquantifyingprintedanddigitalphotosoffoodportions