Cargando…

Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach

BACKGROUND: TNM8 staging for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) surrogates p16 immunohistochemistry for HPV testing. Patients with p16+ OPSCC may lack HPV aetiology. Here, we evaluate the suitability of TNM8 staging for guiding prognosis in such patients. METHODS: HPV status was ascertai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craig, Stephanie G., Anderson, Lesley A., Schache, Andrew G., Moran, Michael, Graham, Laura, Currie, Keith, Rooney, Keith, Robinson, Max, Upile, Navdeep S., Brooker, Rachel, Mesri, Mina, Bingham, Victoria, McQuaid, Stephen, Jones, Terry, McCance, Dennis J., Salto-Tellez, Manuel, McDade, Simon S., James, Jacqueline A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0414-9
_version_ 1783412607149932544
author Craig, Stephanie G.
Anderson, Lesley A.
Schache, Andrew G.
Moran, Michael
Graham, Laura
Currie, Keith
Rooney, Keith
Robinson, Max
Upile, Navdeep S.
Brooker, Rachel
Mesri, Mina
Bingham, Victoria
McQuaid, Stephen
Jones, Terry
McCance, Dennis J.
Salto-Tellez, Manuel
McDade, Simon S.
James, Jacqueline A.
author_facet Craig, Stephanie G.
Anderson, Lesley A.
Schache, Andrew G.
Moran, Michael
Graham, Laura
Currie, Keith
Rooney, Keith
Robinson, Max
Upile, Navdeep S.
Brooker, Rachel
Mesri, Mina
Bingham, Victoria
McQuaid, Stephen
Jones, Terry
McCance, Dennis J.
Salto-Tellez, Manuel
McDade, Simon S.
James, Jacqueline A.
author_sort Craig, Stephanie G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: TNM8 staging for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) surrogates p16 immunohistochemistry for HPV testing. Patients with p16+ OPSCC may lack HPV aetiology. Here, we evaluate the suitability of TNM8 staging for guiding prognosis in such patients. METHODS: HPV status was ascertained using p16 immunohistochemistry and high-risk HPV RNA and DNA in situ hybridisation. Survival by stage in a cohort of OPSCC patients was evaluated using TNM7/TNM8 staging. Survival of p16+/HPV− patients was compared to p16 status. RESULTS: TNM8 staging was found to improve on TNM7 (log rank p = 0·0190 for TNM8 compared with p = 0·0530 for TNM7) in p16+ patients. Patients who tested p16+ but were HPV− (n = 20) had significantly reduced five-year survival (33%) compared to p16+ patients (77%) but not p16− patients (35%). Cancer stage was reduced in 95% of p16+/HPV− patients despite having a mortality rate twice (HR 2.66 [95% CI: 1.37–5.15]) that of p16+/HPV+ patients under new TNM8 staging criteria. CONCLUSION: Given the significantly poorer survival of p16+/HPV− OPSCCs, these data provide compelling evidence for use of an HPV-specific test for staging classification. This has particular relevance in light of potential treatment de-escalation that could expose these patients to inappropriately reduced treatment intensity as treatment algorithms evolve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6474272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64742722019-09-11 Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach Craig, Stephanie G. Anderson, Lesley A. Schache, Andrew G. Moran, Michael Graham, Laura Currie, Keith Rooney, Keith Robinson, Max Upile, Navdeep S. Brooker, Rachel Mesri, Mina Bingham, Victoria McQuaid, Stephen Jones, Terry McCance, Dennis J. Salto-Tellez, Manuel McDade, Simon S. James, Jacqueline A. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: TNM8 staging for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) surrogates p16 immunohistochemistry for HPV testing. Patients with p16+ OPSCC may lack HPV aetiology. Here, we evaluate the suitability of TNM8 staging for guiding prognosis in such patients. METHODS: HPV status was ascertained using p16 immunohistochemistry and high-risk HPV RNA and DNA in situ hybridisation. Survival by stage in a cohort of OPSCC patients was evaluated using TNM7/TNM8 staging. Survival of p16+/HPV− patients was compared to p16 status. RESULTS: TNM8 staging was found to improve on TNM7 (log rank p = 0·0190 for TNM8 compared with p = 0·0530 for TNM7) in p16+ patients. Patients who tested p16+ but were HPV− (n = 20) had significantly reduced five-year survival (33%) compared to p16+ patients (77%) but not p16− patients (35%). Cancer stage was reduced in 95% of p16+/HPV− patients despite having a mortality rate twice (HR 2.66 [95% CI: 1.37–5.15]) that of p16+/HPV+ patients under new TNM8 staging criteria. CONCLUSION: Given the significantly poorer survival of p16+/HPV− OPSCCs, these data provide compelling evidence for use of an HPV-specific test for staging classification. This has particular relevance in light of potential treatment de-escalation that could expose these patients to inappropriately reduced treatment intensity as treatment algorithms evolve. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-20 2019-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6474272/ /pubmed/30890775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0414-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Craig, Stephanie G.
Anderson, Lesley A.
Schache, Andrew G.
Moran, Michael
Graham, Laura
Currie, Keith
Rooney, Keith
Robinson, Max
Upile, Navdeep S.
Brooker, Rachel
Mesri, Mina
Bingham, Victoria
McQuaid, Stephen
Jones, Terry
McCance, Dennis J.
Salto-Tellez, Manuel
McDade, Simon S.
James, Jacqueline A.
Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach
title Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach
title_full Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach
title_fullStr Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach
title_short Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach
title_sort recommendations for determining hpv status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under tnm8 guidelines: a two-tier approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0414-9
work_keys_str_mv AT craigstephanieg recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT andersonlesleya recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT schacheandrewg recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT moranmichael recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT grahamlaura recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT curriekeith recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT rooneykeith recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT robinsonmax recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT upilenavdeeps recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT brookerrachel recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT mesrimina recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT binghamvictoria recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT mcquaidstephen recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT jonesterry recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT mccancedennisj recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT saltotellezmanuel recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT mcdadesimons recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach
AT jamesjacquelinea recommendationsfordetermininghpvstatusinpatientswithoropharyngealcancersundertnm8guidelinesatwotierapproach