Cargando…

Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers

INTRODUCTION: The use of clinical rounds, as an integral part of clinical teaching to help medical students acquire essential skills of practicing medicine, is critically important. An understanding of medical teachers’ perceptions concerning the challenges of clinical rounds can help identify the k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BEIGZADEH, AMIN, BAHAADINBEIGY, KAMBIZ, ADIBI, PEYMAN, YAMANI, NIKOO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086798
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/JAMP.2019.44710
_version_ 1783412697076858880
author BEIGZADEH, AMIN
BAHAADINBEIGY, KAMBIZ
ADIBI, PEYMAN
YAMANI, NIKOO
author_facet BEIGZADEH, AMIN
BAHAADINBEIGY, KAMBIZ
ADIBI, PEYMAN
YAMANI, NIKOO
author_sort BEIGZADEH, AMIN
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of clinical rounds, as an integral part of clinical teaching to help medical students acquire essential skills of practicing medicine, is critically important. An understanding of medical teachers’ perceptions concerning the challenges of clinical rounds can help identify the key areas of focus to better foster professional development of medical students. This study explored the opinions of medical teachers of Kerman University of Medical Sciences about the challenges embedded in clinical rounds. There is a paucity of studies regarding the topic under investigation in our context. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted using a conventional content analysis method. We held a focus group discussion with eight skilled bedside teachers, chosen using purposive sampling, from Kerman University of Medical Sciences in February 2018. The focus group lasted for approximately 2 hours. The session was audio-taped. We analyzed data by considering the verbatim transcribed document of the audio-recorded discussions using conventional content analysis method for theme development. Informed consent was obtained from the participants. RESULTS: Medical teachers described many primary challenges to clinical rounds. Some of them were multiple students on rounding practices, time constraints, priority of research and patient care to teaching, and lack of participation and enthusiasm. We categorized these varied challenges into 5 specific areas related to (1) system; (2) teachers; (3) learners; (4) patients; and (5) evaluation issues. Focus group participants expressed some suggestions to mitigate barriers such as having fewer students on the rounds, addressing time constraints through planning and flexibility, and the provision of medical education award. CONCLUSION: Clinical round practices are valuable but replete with a spectrum of problems. Many challenges affect the quality of teaching in clinical rounds that should be taken into account by bedside teachers in order to improve the quality of rounding practices. The identified challenges can be used in redressing bedside teaching to have more efficient rounding practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6475027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64750272019-05-13 Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers BEIGZADEH, AMIN BAHAADINBEIGY, KAMBIZ ADIBI, PEYMAN YAMANI, NIKOO J Adv Med Educ Prof Original Article INTRODUCTION: The use of clinical rounds, as an integral part of clinical teaching to help medical students acquire essential skills of practicing medicine, is critically important. An understanding of medical teachers’ perceptions concerning the challenges of clinical rounds can help identify the key areas of focus to better foster professional development of medical students. This study explored the opinions of medical teachers of Kerman University of Medical Sciences about the challenges embedded in clinical rounds. There is a paucity of studies regarding the topic under investigation in our context. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted using a conventional content analysis method. We held a focus group discussion with eight skilled bedside teachers, chosen using purposive sampling, from Kerman University of Medical Sciences in February 2018. The focus group lasted for approximately 2 hours. The session was audio-taped. We analyzed data by considering the verbatim transcribed document of the audio-recorded discussions using conventional content analysis method for theme development. Informed consent was obtained from the participants. RESULTS: Medical teachers described many primary challenges to clinical rounds. Some of them were multiple students on rounding practices, time constraints, priority of research and patient care to teaching, and lack of participation and enthusiasm. We categorized these varied challenges into 5 specific areas related to (1) system; (2) teachers; (3) learners; (4) patients; and (5) evaluation issues. Focus group participants expressed some suggestions to mitigate barriers such as having fewer students on the rounds, addressing time constraints through planning and flexibility, and the provision of medical education award. CONCLUSION: Clinical round practices are valuable but replete with a spectrum of problems. Many challenges affect the quality of teaching in clinical rounds that should be taken into account by bedside teachers in order to improve the quality of rounding practices. The identified challenges can be used in redressing bedside teaching to have more efficient rounding practices. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6475027/ /pubmed/31086798 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/JAMP.2019.44710 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
BEIGZADEH, AMIN
BAHAADINBEIGY, KAMBIZ
ADIBI, PEYMAN
YAMANI, NIKOO
Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers
title Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers
title_full Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers
title_fullStr Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers
title_short Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers
title_sort identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: a focus-group study of medical teachers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086798
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/JAMP.2019.44710
work_keys_str_mv AT beigzadehamin identifyingthechallengestogoodclinicalroundsafocusgroupstudyofmedicalteachers
AT bahaadinbeigykambiz identifyingthechallengestogoodclinicalroundsafocusgroupstudyofmedicalteachers
AT adibipeyman identifyingthechallengestogoodclinicalroundsafocusgroupstudyofmedicalteachers
AT yamaninikoo identifyingthechallengestogoodclinicalroundsafocusgroupstudyofmedicalteachers