Cargando…

Asynchronous versus Traditional Teaching for MBBS Undergraduate Students-Effectiveness and Students Perspectives - A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Traditional lectures continue to be one of the common ways of teaching practiced in medical schools across India. However, there are many other effective ways of teaching in large groups and lately e-learning modules, which can be synchronous, asynchronous, or blended, have been used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chauhan, Vijendra Devisingh, Kalra, Juhi, Kalra, Vinita, Negi, Gita, Agarwal, Pradeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6477961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31041166
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_260_18
_version_ 1783413111902961664
author Chauhan, Vijendra Devisingh
Kalra, Juhi
Kalra, Vinita
Negi, Gita
Agarwal, Pradeep
author_facet Chauhan, Vijendra Devisingh
Kalra, Juhi
Kalra, Vinita
Negi, Gita
Agarwal, Pradeep
author_sort Chauhan, Vijendra Devisingh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional lectures continue to be one of the common ways of teaching practiced in medical schools across India. However, there are many other effective ways of teaching in large groups and lately e-learning modules, which can be synchronous, asynchronous, or blended, have been used to complement face-to-face interactions. E-assignments have been effectively used to engage students into meaningful learning. AIM: The aim of the study is to compare asynchronous teaching with traditional teaching in terms of student perspectives and learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After taking ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee, the study was conducted involving 66 student volunteers from MBBS 2(nd) year. All the students were subjected to a pretest on the topic – “low backache” prior to the intervention. The students were then divided into two groups: Group A and Group B of 33 students each. Group A was taught by traditional lecture method, while Group B was given an e-assignment on the topic for which no face-to-face interaction was done earlier. The students from both the groups were then subjected to a posttest followed by feedback. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance, considering the pretest score as a covariate, revealed that the two groups were comparable to begin with P = 0.632. After the intervention, posttest mean scores improved significantly (P < 0.001) within each group, for both the groups, but there was no significant difference in posttest scores on intergroup comparison (P = 0.507). Student feedback brought to light that 85% of the students felt that the traditional lecture method followed by e-learning would be of a great benefit to them. CONCLUSION: Although no single method emerged as superior over the other, student feedback revealed that 90% of the students graded e-module as either satisfactory to good. Most felt that lecture followed by e-modules will help them to learn better.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6477961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64779612019-04-30 Asynchronous versus Traditional Teaching for MBBS Undergraduate Students-Effectiveness and Students Perspectives - A Pilot Study Chauhan, Vijendra Devisingh Kalra, Juhi Kalra, Vinita Negi, Gita Agarwal, Pradeep Int J Appl Basic Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Traditional lectures continue to be one of the common ways of teaching practiced in medical schools across India. However, there are many other effective ways of teaching in large groups and lately e-learning modules, which can be synchronous, asynchronous, or blended, have been used to complement face-to-face interactions. E-assignments have been effectively used to engage students into meaningful learning. AIM: The aim of the study is to compare asynchronous teaching with traditional teaching in terms of student perspectives and learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After taking ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee, the study was conducted involving 66 student volunteers from MBBS 2(nd) year. All the students were subjected to a pretest on the topic – “low backache” prior to the intervention. The students were then divided into two groups: Group A and Group B of 33 students each. Group A was taught by traditional lecture method, while Group B was given an e-assignment on the topic for which no face-to-face interaction was done earlier. The students from both the groups were then subjected to a posttest followed by feedback. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance, considering the pretest score as a covariate, revealed that the two groups were comparable to begin with P = 0.632. After the intervention, posttest mean scores improved significantly (P < 0.001) within each group, for both the groups, but there was no significant difference in posttest scores on intergroup comparison (P = 0.507). Student feedback brought to light that 85% of the students felt that the traditional lecture method followed by e-learning would be of a great benefit to them. CONCLUSION: Although no single method emerged as superior over the other, student feedback revealed that 90% of the students graded e-module as either satisfactory to good. Most felt that lecture followed by e-modules will help them to learn better. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6477961/ /pubmed/31041166 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_260_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chauhan, Vijendra Devisingh
Kalra, Juhi
Kalra, Vinita
Negi, Gita
Agarwal, Pradeep
Asynchronous versus Traditional Teaching for MBBS Undergraduate Students-Effectiveness and Students Perspectives - A Pilot Study
title Asynchronous versus Traditional Teaching for MBBS Undergraduate Students-Effectiveness and Students Perspectives - A Pilot Study
title_full Asynchronous versus Traditional Teaching for MBBS Undergraduate Students-Effectiveness and Students Perspectives - A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Asynchronous versus Traditional Teaching for MBBS Undergraduate Students-Effectiveness and Students Perspectives - A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Asynchronous versus Traditional Teaching for MBBS Undergraduate Students-Effectiveness and Students Perspectives - A Pilot Study
title_short Asynchronous versus Traditional Teaching for MBBS Undergraduate Students-Effectiveness and Students Perspectives - A Pilot Study
title_sort asynchronous versus traditional teaching for mbbs undergraduate students-effectiveness and students perspectives - a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6477961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31041166
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_260_18
work_keys_str_mv AT chauhanvijendradevisingh asynchronousversustraditionalteachingformbbsundergraduatestudentseffectivenessandstudentsperspectivesapilotstudy
AT kalrajuhi asynchronousversustraditionalteachingformbbsundergraduatestudentseffectivenessandstudentsperspectivesapilotstudy
AT kalravinita asynchronousversustraditionalteachingformbbsundergraduatestudentseffectivenessandstudentsperspectivesapilotstudy
AT negigita asynchronousversustraditionalteachingformbbsundergraduatestudentseffectivenessandstudentsperspectivesapilotstudy
AT agarwalpradeep asynchronousversustraditionalteachingformbbsundergraduatestudentseffectivenessandstudentsperspectivesapilotstudy