Cargando…

Age of Acquisition Effect: Evidence From Single-Word Reading and Neural Networks

INTRODUCTION: Many studies show that words learned early in life are read more easily than the ones learned later and are less vulnerable to brain damage. METHODS: the first part of the current study, 25 primary school students in the 5th grade read the word groups learned initially during a previou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sohrabi, Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Neuroscience Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031900
http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.9.10.120
_version_ 1783414071884775424
author Sohrabi, Ahmad
author_facet Sohrabi, Ahmad
author_sort Sohrabi, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many studies show that words learned early in life are read more easily than the ones learned later and are less vulnerable to brain damage. METHODS: the first part of the current study, 25 primary school students in the 5th grade read the word groups learned initially during a previous grade. The words used in the experiments were 327 Farsi monosyllable words matched on the other factors involved in Farsi word naming. RESULTS: The analysis of covariance (the consistency and frequency as covariates) showed that words learned in earlier grades were read more easily than the ones learned later, showing the known effect of the Age of Acquisition (AoA). In the second part of the study, it was tried to simulate AoA in word naming by a neural network model developed earlier based on connectionist approach. While previous studies used random patterns, in the current study words from primary school books were used. Likewise, words learned early by the model were read better than words learned later. However, there was a failure in replicating previous simulation of AoA in English reading by an algorithm called Quick prop for Farsi. In addition, the model was lesioned by removing some hidden units to see its effect on word reading. As a result, words learned earlier were less vulnerable to damage compared with the ones learned later. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that words learned earlier, compared to those learned later, were read better and were less vulnerable to damage. These effects are explained by considering the nature of learning in neural networks trained by error back-propagation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6484193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Iranian Neuroscience Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64841932019-04-27 Age of Acquisition Effect: Evidence From Single-Word Reading and Neural Networks Sohrabi, Ahmad Basic Clin Neurosci Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Many studies show that words learned early in life are read more easily than the ones learned later and are less vulnerable to brain damage. METHODS: the first part of the current study, 25 primary school students in the 5th grade read the word groups learned initially during a previous grade. The words used in the experiments were 327 Farsi monosyllable words matched on the other factors involved in Farsi word naming. RESULTS: The analysis of covariance (the consistency and frequency as covariates) showed that words learned in earlier grades were read more easily than the ones learned later, showing the known effect of the Age of Acquisition (AoA). In the second part of the study, it was tried to simulate AoA in word naming by a neural network model developed earlier based on connectionist approach. While previous studies used random patterns, in the current study words from primary school books were used. Likewise, words learned early by the model were read better than words learned later. However, there was a failure in replicating previous simulation of AoA in English reading by an algorithm called Quick prop for Farsi. In addition, the model was lesioned by removing some hidden units to see its effect on word reading. As a result, words learned earlier were less vulnerable to damage compared with the ones learned later. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that words learned earlier, compared to those learned later, were read better and were less vulnerable to damage. These effects are explained by considering the nature of learning in neural networks trained by error back-propagation. Iranian Neuroscience Society 2019 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6484193/ /pubmed/31031900 http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.9.10.120 Text en Copyright© 2019 Iranian Neuroscience Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Sohrabi, Ahmad
Age of Acquisition Effect: Evidence From Single-Word Reading and Neural Networks
title Age of Acquisition Effect: Evidence From Single-Word Reading and Neural Networks
title_full Age of Acquisition Effect: Evidence From Single-Word Reading and Neural Networks
title_fullStr Age of Acquisition Effect: Evidence From Single-Word Reading and Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Age of Acquisition Effect: Evidence From Single-Word Reading and Neural Networks
title_short Age of Acquisition Effect: Evidence From Single-Word Reading and Neural Networks
title_sort age of acquisition effect: evidence from single-word reading and neural networks
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031900
http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.9.10.120
work_keys_str_mv AT sohrabiahmad ageofacquisitioneffectevidencefromsinglewordreadingandneuralnetworks