Cargando…

Whole body glucoregulation and tissue-specific glucose uptake in a novel Akt substrate of 160 kDa knockout rat model

Akt substrate of 160 kDa (also called AS160 or TBC1D4) is a Rab GTPase activating protein and key regulator of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake which is expressed by multiple tissues, including skeletal muscle, white adipose tissue (WAT) and the heart. This study introduces a novel rat AS160-knocko...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arias, Edward B., Zheng, Xiaohua, Agrawal, Swati, Cartee, Gregory D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6488193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31034517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216236
Descripción
Sumario:Akt substrate of 160 kDa (also called AS160 or TBC1D4) is a Rab GTPase activating protein and key regulator of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake which is expressed by multiple tissues, including skeletal muscle, white adipose tissue (WAT) and the heart. This study introduces a novel rat AS160-knockout (AS160-KO) model that was created using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. We compared male AS160-KO versus wildtype (WT) rats for numerous metabolism-related endpoints. Body mass, body composition, energy expenditure and physical activity did not differ between genotypes. Oral glucose intolerance was detected in AS160-KO versus WT rats (P<0.005). A hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HEC) revealed insulin resistance for glucose infusion rate (P<0.05) with unaltered hepatic glucose production in AS160-KO versus WT rats. Genotype-effects on glucose uptake during the HEC: 1) was significantly lower in epitrochlearis (P<0.01) and extensor digitorum longus (P<0.05) of AS160-KO versus WT rats, and tended to be lower for AS160-KO versus WT rats in the soleus (P<0.06) and gastrocnemius (P<0.08); 2) tended to be greater for AS160-KO versus WT rats in white adipose tissue (P = 0.09); and 3) was significantly greater in the heart (P<0.005) of AS160-KO versus WT rats. GLUT4 protein abundance was significantly lower for AS160-KO versus WT rats in each tissue analyzed (P<0.01–0.001) except the gastrocnemius. Ex vivo insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was significantly lower (P<0.001) for AS160-KO versus WT rats in isolated epitrochlearis or soleus. Insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation (in vivo or ex vivo) did not differ between genotypes for any tissue tested. Ex vivo AICAR-stimulated glucose uptake by isolated epitrochlearis was significantly lower for AS160-KO versus WT rats (P<0.01) without genotype-induced alteration in AMP-activated protein phosphorylation. This unique AS160-KO rat model, which elucidated striking genotype-related modifications in glucoregulation, will enable future research aimed at understanding AS160’s roles in numerous physiological processes in response to various interventions (e.g., diet and/or exercise).