Cargando…

The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are recommended to use evidence-based practice (EBP) principles to update and improve clinical practice. Well-designed educational initiatives, together with practice and feedback opportunities can improve individuals’ EBP knowledge, skills and attitudes. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mickan, Sharon, Hilder, Joanne, Wenke, Rachel, Thomas, Rae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1567-1
_version_ 1783416393540042752
author Mickan, Sharon
Hilder, Joanne
Wenke, Rachel
Thomas, Rae
author_facet Mickan, Sharon
Hilder, Joanne
Wenke, Rachel
Thomas, Rae
author_sort Mickan, Sharon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are recommended to use evidence-based practice (EBP) principles to update and improve clinical practice. Well-designed educational initiatives, together with practice and feedback opportunities can improve individuals’ EBP knowledge, skills and attitudes. METHODS: A concurrent mixed methods assessment was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of four monthly workshops on allied health professionals’ knowledge, skills, self-efficacy and behaviour. In between workshops, professionals were encouraged to practice and integrate EBP learnings with colleagues in their workplace. Participants completed three pre and post intervention assessments: Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale; adapted Fresno test; and an adapted EBP Implementation Scale. A purpose designed satisfaction questionnaire was completed immediately after the educational intervention and follow up focus groups were conducted after 3 months. Mean change in assessment data was quantitatively assessed and comments from the clinician satisfaction questionnaire and focus groups were thematically analysed and interpreted together with quantitative data using the Classification Rubric for EBP Assessment tools in Education (CREATE). RESULTS: Sixteen allied health professionals participated in the EBP workshops and completed all baseline and post intervention assessments. Seven clinicians participated in follow up focus groups. All clinicians reported a positive reaction to the learning experience, preferring short monthly workshops to a full day session. They self-reported improvements in self-efficacy (mean change 15 p < 0.001) and implementing EBP behaviours (mean change 7, p < 0.001) from pre- to post-intervention. Although the positive change in EBP knowledge measured by the adapted Fresno test was not statistically significant (mean change 10, p = 0.21), clinicians described examples of improved knowledge and skills across all five key steps of EBP during the focus groups. A further, post hoc analysis of individual questions in the two self-reported scales indicated consistent improvement across key EBP knowledge and skills. CONCLUSIONS: A tailored small group EBP education intervention can enhance AHPs’ self-efficacy to develop answerable questions, search the literature, critically appraise, apply and evaluate research evidence. Through practicing these behaviours and sharing new learning with their peers, allied health professionals can enhance their capability and motivation to use research evidence to potentially improve clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1567-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6503357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65033572019-05-10 The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation Mickan, Sharon Hilder, Joanne Wenke, Rachel Thomas, Rae BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are recommended to use evidence-based practice (EBP) principles to update and improve clinical practice. Well-designed educational initiatives, together with practice and feedback opportunities can improve individuals’ EBP knowledge, skills and attitudes. METHODS: A concurrent mixed methods assessment was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of four monthly workshops on allied health professionals’ knowledge, skills, self-efficacy and behaviour. In between workshops, professionals were encouraged to practice and integrate EBP learnings with colleagues in their workplace. Participants completed three pre and post intervention assessments: Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale; adapted Fresno test; and an adapted EBP Implementation Scale. A purpose designed satisfaction questionnaire was completed immediately after the educational intervention and follow up focus groups were conducted after 3 months. Mean change in assessment data was quantitatively assessed and comments from the clinician satisfaction questionnaire and focus groups were thematically analysed and interpreted together with quantitative data using the Classification Rubric for EBP Assessment tools in Education (CREATE). RESULTS: Sixteen allied health professionals participated in the EBP workshops and completed all baseline and post intervention assessments. Seven clinicians participated in follow up focus groups. All clinicians reported a positive reaction to the learning experience, preferring short monthly workshops to a full day session. They self-reported improvements in self-efficacy (mean change 15 p < 0.001) and implementing EBP behaviours (mean change 7, p < 0.001) from pre- to post-intervention. Although the positive change in EBP knowledge measured by the adapted Fresno test was not statistically significant (mean change 10, p = 0.21), clinicians described examples of improved knowledge and skills across all five key steps of EBP during the focus groups. A further, post hoc analysis of individual questions in the two self-reported scales indicated consistent improvement across key EBP knowledge and skills. CONCLUSIONS: A tailored small group EBP education intervention can enhance AHPs’ self-efficacy to develop answerable questions, search the literature, critically appraise, apply and evaluate research evidence. Through practicing these behaviours and sharing new learning with their peers, allied health professionals can enhance their capability and motivation to use research evidence to potentially improve clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1567-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6503357/ /pubmed/31060553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1567-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mickan, Sharon
Hilder, Joanne
Wenke, Rachel
Thomas, Rae
The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation
title The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation
title_full The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation
title_fullStr The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation
title_short The impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation
title_sort impact of a small-group educational intervention for allied health professionals to enhance evidence-based practice: mixed methods evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1567-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mickansharon theimpactofasmallgroupeducationalinterventionforalliedhealthprofessionalstoenhanceevidencebasedpracticemixedmethodsevaluation
AT hilderjoanne theimpactofasmallgroupeducationalinterventionforalliedhealthprofessionalstoenhanceevidencebasedpracticemixedmethodsevaluation
AT wenkerachel theimpactofasmallgroupeducationalinterventionforalliedhealthprofessionalstoenhanceevidencebasedpracticemixedmethodsevaluation
AT thomasrae theimpactofasmallgroupeducationalinterventionforalliedhealthprofessionalstoenhanceevidencebasedpracticemixedmethodsevaluation
AT mickansharon impactofasmallgroupeducationalinterventionforalliedhealthprofessionalstoenhanceevidencebasedpracticemixedmethodsevaluation
AT hilderjoanne impactofasmallgroupeducationalinterventionforalliedhealthprofessionalstoenhanceevidencebasedpracticemixedmethodsevaluation
AT wenkerachel impactofasmallgroupeducationalinterventionforalliedhealthprofessionalstoenhanceevidencebasedpracticemixedmethodsevaluation
AT thomasrae impactofasmallgroupeducationalinterventionforalliedhealthprofessionalstoenhanceevidencebasedpracticemixedmethodsevaluation