Cargando…
Are non-constant rates and non-proportional treatment effects accounted for in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials? A review of current practice
BACKGROUND: Most clinical trials with time-to-event primary outcomes are designed assuming constant event rates and proportional hazards over time. Non-constant event rates and non-proportional hazards are seen increasingly frequently in trials. The objectives of this review were firstly to identify...
Autores principales: | Jachno, Kim, Heritier, Stephane, Wolfe, Rory |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6524252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31096924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0749-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Impact of a non-constant baseline hazard on detection of time-dependent treatment effects: a simulation study
por: Jachno, Kim, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Examining evidence of time-dependent treatment effects: an illustration using regression methods
por: Jachno, Kim M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
On the (not so) constant proportional trade-off in TTO
por: Attema, Arthur E., et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
An approach to trial design and analysis in the era of non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect
por: Royston, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Numerical Proportion Representation: A Neurocomputational Account
por: Chen, Qi, et al.
Publicado: (2017)