Cargando…

Comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is activated in response to diverse intrinsic and extrinsic cellular stresses and controls a broad cell-protective gene network. Whether p53:DNA binding and subsequent transcriptional activation differs downstream of these diverse intrinsic and extrinsic activators i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Catizone, Allison N., Good, Charly Ryan, Alexander, Katherine A., Berger, Shelley L., Sammons, Morgan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30966857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2019.1593643
_version_ 1783420018475663360
author Catizone, Allison N.
Good, Charly Ryan
Alexander, Katherine A.
Berger, Shelley L.
Sammons, Morgan A.
author_facet Catizone, Allison N.
Good, Charly Ryan
Alexander, Katherine A.
Berger, Shelley L.
Sammons, Morgan A.
author_sort Catizone, Allison N.
collection PubMed
description The tumor suppressor protein p53 is activated in response to diverse intrinsic and extrinsic cellular stresses and controls a broad cell-protective gene network. Whether p53:DNA binding and subsequent transcriptional activation differs downstream of these diverse intrinsic and extrinsic activators is controversial. Using primary human fibroblasts, we assessed the genome-wide profile of p53 binding, chromatin structure, and transcriptional dynamics after either genotoxic or nongenotoxic activation of p53. Activation of p53 by treatment with either etoposide or the small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor nutlin 3A yields strikingly similar genome-wide binding of p53 and concomitant changes to local chromatin modifications and structure. DNA damage, but not p53 activation per se, leads to increased expression of genes in an inflammatory cytokine pathway. The NF-κB pathway inhibitor Bay 11-7082 abrogates etoposide-mediated activation of the inflammation gene signature but does not affect expression of canonical p53 target genes. Our data demonstrate that differential activation of p53 within the same cell type leads to highly similar genome-wide binding, chromatin dynamics, and gene expression dynamics and that DNA damage-mediated signaling through NF-κB likely controls the observed pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6527265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65272652019-05-29 Comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks Catizone, Allison N. Good, Charly Ryan Alexander, Katherine A. Berger, Shelley L. Sammons, Morgan A. Cell Cycle Research Paper The tumor suppressor protein p53 is activated in response to diverse intrinsic and extrinsic cellular stresses and controls a broad cell-protective gene network. Whether p53:DNA binding and subsequent transcriptional activation differs downstream of these diverse intrinsic and extrinsic activators is controversial. Using primary human fibroblasts, we assessed the genome-wide profile of p53 binding, chromatin structure, and transcriptional dynamics after either genotoxic or nongenotoxic activation of p53. Activation of p53 by treatment with either etoposide or the small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor nutlin 3A yields strikingly similar genome-wide binding of p53 and concomitant changes to local chromatin modifications and structure. DNA damage, but not p53 activation per se, leads to increased expression of genes in an inflammatory cytokine pathway. The NF-κB pathway inhibitor Bay 11-7082 abrogates etoposide-mediated activation of the inflammation gene signature but does not affect expression of canonical p53 target genes. Our data demonstrate that differential activation of p53 within the same cell type leads to highly similar genome-wide binding, chromatin dynamics, and gene expression dynamics and that DNA damage-mediated signaling through NF-κB likely controls the observed pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression pattern. Taylor & Francis 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6527265/ /pubmed/30966857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2019.1593643 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Catizone, Allison N.
Good, Charly Ryan
Alexander, Katherine A.
Berger, Shelley L.
Sammons, Morgan A.
Comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks
title Comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks
title_full Comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks
title_fullStr Comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks
title_short Comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks
title_sort comparison of genotoxic versus nongenotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6527265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30966857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2019.1593643
work_keys_str_mv AT catizoneallisonn comparisonofgenotoxicversusnongenotoxicstabilizationofp53providesinsightintoparallelstressresponsivetranscriptionalnetworks
AT goodcharlyryan comparisonofgenotoxicversusnongenotoxicstabilizationofp53providesinsightintoparallelstressresponsivetranscriptionalnetworks
AT alexanderkatherinea comparisonofgenotoxicversusnongenotoxicstabilizationofp53providesinsightintoparallelstressresponsivetranscriptionalnetworks
AT bergershelleyl comparisonofgenotoxicversusnongenotoxicstabilizationofp53providesinsightintoparallelstressresponsivetranscriptionalnetworks
AT sammonsmorgana comparisonofgenotoxicversusnongenotoxicstabilizationofp53providesinsightintoparallelstressresponsivetranscriptionalnetworks