Reporting preclinical anesthesia study (REPEAT): Evaluating the quality of reporting in the preclinical anesthesiology literature

Poor reporting quality may contribute to irreproducibility of results and failed ‘bench-to-bedside’ translation. Consequently, guidelines have been developed to improve the complete and transparent reporting of in vivo preclinical studies. To examine the impact of such guidelines on core methodologi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fergusson, Dean A., Avey, Marc T., Barron, Carly C., Bocock, Mathew, Biefer, Kristen E., Boet, Sylvain, Bourque, Stephane L., Conic, Isidora, Chen, Kai, Dong, Yuan Yi., Fox, Grace M., George, Ronald B., Goldenberg, Neil M., Gragasin, Ferrante S., Harsha, Prathiba, Hong, Patrick J., James, Tyler E., Larrigan, Sarah M., MacNeil, Jenna L., Manuel, Courtney A., Maximos, Sarah, Mazer, David, Mittal, Rohan, McGinn, Ryan, Nguyen, Long H., Patel, Abhilasha, Richebé, Philippe, Saha, Tarit K., Steinberg, Benjamin E., Sampson, Sonja D., Stewart, Duncan J., Syed, Summer, Vella, Kimberly, Wesch, Neil L., Lalu, Manoj M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215221

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6532843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215221

Ejemplares similares