Cargando…

Assessing Diagnostic Reasoning Using a Standardized Case-Based Discussion

BACKGROUND: Development of diagnostic reasoning (DR) is fundamental to medical students’ training, but assessing DR is challenging. Several written assessments focus on DR but lack the ability to dynamically assess DR. Oral assessment formats have strengths but have largely lost favour due to concer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sutherland, Ruth M, Reid, Katharine J, Chiavaroli, Neville G, Smallwood, David, McColl, Geoffrey J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120519849411
_version_ 1783421974787129344
author Sutherland, Ruth M
Reid, Katharine J
Chiavaroli, Neville G
Smallwood, David
McColl, Geoffrey J
author_facet Sutherland, Ruth M
Reid, Katharine J
Chiavaroli, Neville G
Smallwood, David
McColl, Geoffrey J
author_sort Sutherland, Ruth M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Development of diagnostic reasoning (DR) is fundamental to medical students’ training, but assessing DR is challenging. Several written assessments focus on DR but lack the ability to dynamically assess DR. Oral assessment formats have strengths but have largely lost favour due to concerns about low reliability and lack of standardization. Medical schools and specialist medical colleges value many forms of oral assessment (eg, long case, Objective Structured Clinical Examination [OSCE], viva voce) but are increasingly searching for ways in which to standardize these formats. We sought to develop and trial a Standardized Case-Based Discussion (SCBD), a highly standardized and interactive oral assessment of DR. METHODS: Two initial cohorts of medical students (n = 319 and n = 342) participated in the SCBD as part of their assessments. All students watch a video trigger (based on an authentic clinical case) and discuss their DR with an examiner for 15 minutes. Examiners probe students’ DR and assess how students respond to new standardized clinical information. An online examiner training module clearly articulates expected student performance standards. We used student achievement and student and examiner perceptions to gauge the performance of this new assessment form over 2 implementation years. RESULTS: The SCBD was feasible to implement for a large student cohort and was acceptable to students and examiners. Most students and all examiners agreed that the SCBD discussion provided useful information on students’ DR. The assessment had acceptable internal consistency, and the associations with other assessment formats were small and positive, suggesting that the SCBD measures a related, yet novel construct. CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous, standardized oral assessments have a place in a programme of assessment in initial medical training because they provide opportunities to explore DR that are limited in other formats. We plan to incorporate an SCBD into our clinical assessments for the first year of clinical training, where teaching and assessing basic DR is emphasized. We will also explore further examiners’ understanding of and approach to assessing DR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6537277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65372772019-06-14 Assessing Diagnostic Reasoning Using a Standardized Case-Based Discussion Sutherland, Ruth M Reid, Katharine J Chiavaroli, Neville G Smallwood, David McColl, Geoffrey J J Med Educ Curric Dev Methodology BACKGROUND: Development of diagnostic reasoning (DR) is fundamental to medical students’ training, but assessing DR is challenging. Several written assessments focus on DR but lack the ability to dynamically assess DR. Oral assessment formats have strengths but have largely lost favour due to concerns about low reliability and lack of standardization. Medical schools and specialist medical colleges value many forms of oral assessment (eg, long case, Objective Structured Clinical Examination [OSCE], viva voce) but are increasingly searching for ways in which to standardize these formats. We sought to develop and trial a Standardized Case-Based Discussion (SCBD), a highly standardized and interactive oral assessment of DR. METHODS: Two initial cohorts of medical students (n = 319 and n = 342) participated in the SCBD as part of their assessments. All students watch a video trigger (based on an authentic clinical case) and discuss their DR with an examiner for 15 minutes. Examiners probe students’ DR and assess how students respond to new standardized clinical information. An online examiner training module clearly articulates expected student performance standards. We used student achievement and student and examiner perceptions to gauge the performance of this new assessment form over 2 implementation years. RESULTS: The SCBD was feasible to implement for a large student cohort and was acceptable to students and examiners. Most students and all examiners agreed that the SCBD discussion provided useful information on students’ DR. The assessment had acceptable internal consistency, and the associations with other assessment formats were small and positive, suggesting that the SCBD measures a related, yet novel construct. CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous, standardized oral assessments have a place in a programme of assessment in initial medical training because they provide opportunities to explore DR that are limited in other formats. We plan to incorporate an SCBD into our clinical assessments for the first year of clinical training, where teaching and assessing basic DR is emphasized. We will also explore further examiners’ understanding of and approach to assessing DR. SAGE Publications 2019-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6537277/ /pubmed/31206032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120519849411 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Methodology
Sutherland, Ruth M
Reid, Katharine J
Chiavaroli, Neville G
Smallwood, David
McColl, Geoffrey J
Assessing Diagnostic Reasoning Using a Standardized Case-Based Discussion
title Assessing Diagnostic Reasoning Using a Standardized Case-Based Discussion
title_full Assessing Diagnostic Reasoning Using a Standardized Case-Based Discussion
title_fullStr Assessing Diagnostic Reasoning Using a Standardized Case-Based Discussion
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Diagnostic Reasoning Using a Standardized Case-Based Discussion
title_short Assessing Diagnostic Reasoning Using a Standardized Case-Based Discussion
title_sort assessing diagnostic reasoning using a standardized case-based discussion
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6537277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120519849411
work_keys_str_mv AT sutherlandruthm assessingdiagnosticreasoningusingastandardizedcasebaseddiscussion
AT reidkatharinej assessingdiagnosticreasoningusingastandardizedcasebaseddiscussion
AT chiavarolinevilleg assessingdiagnosticreasoningusingastandardizedcasebaseddiscussion
AT smallwooddavid assessingdiagnosticreasoningusingastandardizedcasebaseddiscussion
AT mccollgeoffreyj assessingdiagnosticreasoningusingastandardizedcasebaseddiscussion