Cargando…

Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2’-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2’OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection

Despite the successful application of LNA/2’OMe-FISH procedures for bacteria detection, there is a lack of knowledge on the properties that affect hybridization. Such information is crucial for the rational design of protocols. Hence, this work aimed to evaluate the effect of three essential factors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azevedo, Andreia S., Sousa, Inês M., Fernandes, Ricardo M., Azevedo, Nuno F., Almeida, Carina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217689
_version_ 1783423235110469632
author Azevedo, Andreia S.
Sousa, Inês M.
Fernandes, Ricardo M.
Azevedo, Nuno F.
Almeida, Carina
author_facet Azevedo, Andreia S.
Sousa, Inês M.
Fernandes, Ricardo M.
Azevedo, Nuno F.
Almeida, Carina
author_sort Azevedo, Andreia S.
collection PubMed
description Despite the successful application of LNA/2’OMe-FISH procedures for bacteria detection, there is a lack of knowledge on the properties that affect hybridization. Such information is crucial for the rational design of protocols. Hence, this work aimed to evaluate the effect of three essential factors on the LNA/2’OMe hybridization step—hybridization temperature, NaCl concentration and type and concentration of denaturant (formamide, ethylene carbonate and urea). This optimization was performed for 3 Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Citrobacter freundii) and 2 Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis), employing the response surface methodology and a Eubacteria probe. In general, it was observed that a high NaCl concentration is beneficial (from 2 M to 5 M), regardless of the denaturant used. Urea, formamide and ethylene carbonate are suitable denaturants for LNA/2’OMe-FISH applications; but urea provides higher fluorescence intensities among the different bacteria, especially for gram-positive bacteria and for P. aeruginosa. However, a unique optimal protocol was not found for all tested bacteria. Despite this, the results indicate that a hybridization solution with 2 M of urea and 4 M of NaCl would be a proper starting point. Furthermore, a hybridization temperature around 62°C, for 14 bp probes with LNA monomers at every third position of 2′OMe and 64% of GC content, should be use in initial optimization of new LNA/2’OMe-FISH protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6544301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65443012019-06-17 Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2’-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2’OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection Azevedo, Andreia S. Sousa, Inês M. Fernandes, Ricardo M. Azevedo, Nuno F. Almeida, Carina PLoS One Research Article Despite the successful application of LNA/2’OMe-FISH procedures for bacteria detection, there is a lack of knowledge on the properties that affect hybridization. Such information is crucial for the rational design of protocols. Hence, this work aimed to evaluate the effect of three essential factors on the LNA/2’OMe hybridization step—hybridization temperature, NaCl concentration and type and concentration of denaturant (formamide, ethylene carbonate and urea). This optimization was performed for 3 Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Citrobacter freundii) and 2 Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis), employing the response surface methodology and a Eubacteria probe. In general, it was observed that a high NaCl concentration is beneficial (from 2 M to 5 M), regardless of the denaturant used. Urea, formamide and ethylene carbonate are suitable denaturants for LNA/2’OMe-FISH applications; but urea provides higher fluorescence intensities among the different bacteria, especially for gram-positive bacteria and for P. aeruginosa. However, a unique optimal protocol was not found for all tested bacteria. Despite this, the results indicate that a hybridization solution with 2 M of urea and 4 M of NaCl would be a proper starting point. Furthermore, a hybridization temperature around 62°C, for 14 bp probes with LNA monomers at every third position of 2′OMe and 64% of GC content, should be use in initial optimization of new LNA/2’OMe-FISH protocols. Public Library of Science 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6544301/ /pubmed/31150460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217689 Text en © 2019 Azevedo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Azevedo, Andreia S.
Sousa, Inês M.
Fernandes, Ricardo M.
Azevedo, Nuno F.
Almeida, Carina
Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2’-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2’OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2’-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2’OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title_full Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2’-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2’OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title_fullStr Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2’-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2’OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2’-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2’OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title_short Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2’-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2’OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title_sort optimizing locked nucleic acid/2’-o-methyl-rna fluorescence in situ hybridization (lna/2’ome-fish) procedure for bacterial detection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217689
work_keys_str_mv AT azevedoandreias optimizinglockednucleicacid2omethylrnafluorescenceinsituhybridizationlna2omefishprocedureforbacterialdetection
AT sousainesm optimizinglockednucleicacid2omethylrnafluorescenceinsituhybridizationlna2omefishprocedureforbacterialdetection
AT fernandesricardom optimizinglockednucleicacid2omethylrnafluorescenceinsituhybridizationlna2omefishprocedureforbacterialdetection
AT azevedonunof optimizinglockednucleicacid2omethylrnafluorescenceinsituhybridizationlna2omefishprocedureforbacterialdetection
AT almeidacarina optimizinglockednucleicacid2omethylrnafluorescenceinsituhybridizationlna2omefishprocedureforbacterialdetection