Cargando…

A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma

BACKGROUND: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are attractive non-invasive biomarkers for a variety of conditions due to their stability and altered pathophysiological expression levels. Reliable detection of global expression profiles is required to maximise miRNA biomarker discovery. Although developm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Ryan K.Y., MacMahon, Meabh, Woodside, Jayne V., Simpson, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5826-7
_version_ 1783423710120640512
author Wong, Ryan K.Y.
MacMahon, Meabh
Woodside, Jayne V.
Simpson, David A.
author_facet Wong, Ryan K.Y.
MacMahon, Meabh
Woodside, Jayne V.
Simpson, David A.
author_sort Wong, Ryan K.Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are attractive non-invasive biomarkers for a variety of conditions due to their stability and altered pathophysiological expression levels. Reliable detection of global expression profiles is required to maximise miRNA biomarker discovery. Although developments in small RNA-Seq technology have improved detection of plasma-based miRNAs, the low RNA content and sequencing bias introduced during library preparation remain challenging. In this study we compare commercially available RNA extraction methods using MagnaZol (Bioo Scientific) or miRNeasy (QIAGEN) and three library preparation methods - CleanTag (TriLink), NEXTflex (Bioo Scientific) and QIAseq (QIAGEN) - which aim to address one or both of these issues. RESULTS: Different RNA extractions and library preparation protocols result in differential detection of miRNAs. A greater proportion of reads mapped to miRNAs in libraries prepared with MagnaZol RNA than with miRNeasy RNA. Libraries prepared using QIAseq demonstrated the greatest miRNA diversity with many more very low abundance miRNAs detected (~ 2–3 fold more with < 10 reads), whilst CleanTag detected the fewest individual miRNAs and considerably over-represented miR-486-5p. Libraries prepared with QIAseq had the strongest correlation with RT-qPCR quantification. Analysis of unique molecular indices (UMIs) incorporated in the QIAseq protocol indicate that little PCR bias is introduced during small RNA library preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Small RNAs were consistently detected using all RNA extraction and library preparation protocols tested, but with some miRNAs at significantly different levels. Choice of the most suitable protocol should be informed by the relative importance of minimising the total sequencing required, detection of rare miRNAs or absolute quantification. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5826-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6547578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65475782019-06-06 A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma Wong, Ryan K.Y. MacMahon, Meabh Woodside, Jayne V. Simpson, David A. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are attractive non-invasive biomarkers for a variety of conditions due to their stability and altered pathophysiological expression levels. Reliable detection of global expression profiles is required to maximise miRNA biomarker discovery. Although developments in small RNA-Seq technology have improved detection of plasma-based miRNAs, the low RNA content and sequencing bias introduced during library preparation remain challenging. In this study we compare commercially available RNA extraction methods using MagnaZol (Bioo Scientific) or miRNeasy (QIAGEN) and three library preparation methods - CleanTag (TriLink), NEXTflex (Bioo Scientific) and QIAseq (QIAGEN) - which aim to address one or both of these issues. RESULTS: Different RNA extractions and library preparation protocols result in differential detection of miRNAs. A greater proportion of reads mapped to miRNAs in libraries prepared with MagnaZol RNA than with miRNeasy RNA. Libraries prepared using QIAseq demonstrated the greatest miRNA diversity with many more very low abundance miRNAs detected (~ 2–3 fold more with < 10 reads), whilst CleanTag detected the fewest individual miRNAs and considerably over-represented miR-486-5p. Libraries prepared with QIAseq had the strongest correlation with RT-qPCR quantification. Analysis of unique molecular indices (UMIs) incorporated in the QIAseq protocol indicate that little PCR bias is introduced during small RNA library preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Small RNAs were consistently detected using all RNA extraction and library preparation protocols tested, but with some miRNAs at significantly different levels. Choice of the most suitable protocol should be informed by the relative importance of minimising the total sequencing required, detection of rare miRNAs or absolute quantification. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5826-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6547578/ /pubmed/31159762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5826-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wong, Ryan K.Y.
MacMahon, Meabh
Woodside, Jayne V.
Simpson, David A.
A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma
title A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma
title_full A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma
title_fullStr A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma
title_short A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma
title_sort comparison of rna extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small rnas in plasma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5826-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wongryanky acomparisonofrnaextractionandsequencingprotocolsfordetectionofsmallrnasinplasma
AT macmahonmeabh acomparisonofrnaextractionandsequencingprotocolsfordetectionofsmallrnasinplasma
AT woodsidejaynev acomparisonofrnaextractionandsequencingprotocolsfordetectionofsmallrnasinplasma
AT simpsondavida acomparisonofrnaextractionandsequencingprotocolsfordetectionofsmallrnasinplasma
AT wongryanky comparisonofrnaextractionandsequencingprotocolsfordetectionofsmallrnasinplasma
AT macmahonmeabh comparisonofrnaextractionandsequencingprotocolsfordetectionofsmallrnasinplasma
AT woodsidejaynev comparisonofrnaextractionandsequencingprotocolsfordetectionofsmallrnasinplasma
AT simpsondavida comparisonofrnaextractionandsequencingprotocolsfordetectionofsmallrnasinplasma