Cargando…
Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership
The primary and secondary learning years shape development of scientific interest and skills required for science literacy, presenting a critical timeline target for science education intervention. Although many initiatives exist to target this timeframe, the modern classroom belies easy scientific...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.5 |
_version_ | 1783425161732554752 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Joanna LaBounty, Thomas J Ekker, Stephen C Pierret, Chris |
author_facet | Yang, Joanna LaBounty, Thomas J Ekker, Stephen C Pierret, Chris |
author_sort | Yang, Joanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary and secondary learning years shape development of scientific interest and skills required for science literacy, presenting a critical timeline target for science education intervention. Although many initiatives exist to target this timeframe, the modern classroom belies easy scientific investigation. Numerous initiatives often run simultaneously in a given classroom, creating limited capacity for variable control. Consequently, there is a dearth of high-quality and meaningful data in education sciences that exacerbates the general segregation of education research from practice. Many science reform programmes go unmeasured. The limited number that is researched often report strictly qualitative results or stop short of statistically significant quantitative investigation. Lack of high-resolution data restricts the ability to make informed policy changes and precludes attainment of “evidence-based education”. Here, we demonstrate 5-year efficacy of a novel, inquiry-based primary and secondary science reform programme Integrated Science Education Outreach (InSciEd Out). Five years of data over three cohorts of matched students from US grades 5–8 show maintained gains in science fair and honours biology election, as well as improved performance on Minnesota state standardized science testing. Detailed value-added analyses further reveal InSciEd Out-correlated gains in partnership-focused areas of life sciences, and history and nature of science. These analyses provide evidence that scientifically rigorous evaluation demonstrating relevant programme efficacy is indeed achievable in education science. Our results support the premise that the InSciEd Out programme is a scalable intervention capable of primary and secondary science education reform. The programme substantively builds upon prior efforts in the field. Although InSciEd Out deploys novel approaches and tools, the broad lessons learned from this programme are readily translatable to other contemporary efforts cultivating science literacy for all. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6555486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65554862019-06-07 Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership Yang, Joanna LaBounty, Thomas J Ekker, Stephen C Pierret, Chris Palgrave Commun Article The primary and secondary learning years shape development of scientific interest and skills required for science literacy, presenting a critical timeline target for science education intervention. Although many initiatives exist to target this timeframe, the modern classroom belies easy scientific investigation. Numerous initiatives often run simultaneously in a given classroom, creating limited capacity for variable control. Consequently, there is a dearth of high-quality and meaningful data in education sciences that exacerbates the general segregation of education research from practice. Many science reform programmes go unmeasured. The limited number that is researched often report strictly qualitative results or stop short of statistically significant quantitative investigation. Lack of high-resolution data restricts the ability to make informed policy changes and precludes attainment of “evidence-based education”. Here, we demonstrate 5-year efficacy of a novel, inquiry-based primary and secondary science reform programme Integrated Science Education Outreach (InSciEd Out). Five years of data over three cohorts of matched students from US grades 5–8 show maintained gains in science fair and honours biology election, as well as improved performance on Minnesota state standardized science testing. Detailed value-added analyses further reveal InSciEd Out-correlated gains in partnership-focused areas of life sciences, and history and nature of science. These analyses provide evidence that scientifically rigorous evaluation demonstrating relevant programme efficacy is indeed achievable in education science. Our results support the premise that the InSciEd Out programme is a scalable intervention capable of primary and secondary science education reform. The programme substantively builds upon prior efforts in the field. Although InSciEd Out deploys novel approaches and tools, the broad lessons learned from this programme are readily translatable to other contemporary efforts cultivating science literacy for all. 2016-03-01 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC6555486/ /pubmed/31179011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.5 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Reprints and permission information is available at http://www.palgrave-journals.com/pal/authors/rights_and_permissions.html |
spellingShingle | Article Yang, Joanna LaBounty, Thomas J Ekker, Stephen C Pierret, Chris Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership |
title | Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership |
title_full | Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership |
title_fullStr | Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership |
title_full_unstemmed | Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership |
title_short | Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership |
title_sort | students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangjoanna studentsbeingandbecomingscientistsmeasuredsuccessinanovelscienceeducationpartnership AT labountythomasj studentsbeingandbecomingscientistsmeasuredsuccessinanovelscienceeducationpartnership AT ekkerstephenc studentsbeingandbecomingscientistsmeasuredsuccessinanovelscienceeducationpartnership AT pierretchris studentsbeingandbecomingscientistsmeasuredsuccessinanovelscienceeducationpartnership |