Cargando…

Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyse the impact that web-based distance learning has on knowledge gain in medical students, as well as student perceptions of the methodology. METHODS: This was an educational intervention study conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in the city of São Paulo, Br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laks, Michel, Guerra, Carla Morales, Miraglia, João Luiz, Medeiros, Eduardo Alexandrino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31174524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1623-x
_version_ 1783425247122292736
author Laks, Michel
Guerra, Carla Morales
Miraglia, João Luiz
Medeiros, Eduardo Alexandrino
author_facet Laks, Michel
Guerra, Carla Morales
Miraglia, João Luiz
Medeiros, Eduardo Alexandrino
author_sort Laks, Michel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyse the impact that web-based distance learning has on knowledge gain in medical students, as well as student perceptions of the methodology. METHODS: This was an educational intervention study conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. From 2008 to 2014, we offered a free web-based distance learning course, covering antimicrobial use and microbial resistance, to fifth-year medical students. The course encompassed 100 h of activities, with five theoretical modules, exercises and simulations, within a virtual learning environment. The students were tutored in their online activities, and some classes were conducted in real time for live discussions. In addition, students underwent face-to-face assessments of their knowledge of the topic before and after the course. Statistical analysis was performed and the means of the overall scores were obtained, as were the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The means were compared by two-tailed paired t-tests and by the paired Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Of 814 eligible medical students, 606 (74.45%) completed the entire course during the study period. The mean score for knowledge of the topic was significantly higher on the final assessment than on the initial assessment (p <  0.001). We found that dedication (in hours) was directly proportional to the level of participation, as reflected in the mean final score (p = 0.009) and in the proportion of students who passed (p = 0.028). All of the participants considered their knowledge adequate or insufficient before the course, stating that it is quite important or important to address the topic during medical education. Although dedication levels were low, 70.5% stated that they had learned “quite a lot” or “more than expected” about the topic and would dedicate more time to it if they could. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a virtual learning environment can promote teaching and learning in the infectious diseases field, specifically for antimicrobial stewardship, increasing knowledge significantly, and should be considered for inclusion in the final stages of medical education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6555969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65559692019-06-10 Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education Laks, Michel Guerra, Carla Morales Miraglia, João Luiz Medeiros, Eduardo Alexandrino BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyse the impact that web-based distance learning has on knowledge gain in medical students, as well as student perceptions of the methodology. METHODS: This was an educational intervention study conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. From 2008 to 2014, we offered a free web-based distance learning course, covering antimicrobial use and microbial resistance, to fifth-year medical students. The course encompassed 100 h of activities, with five theoretical modules, exercises and simulations, within a virtual learning environment. The students were tutored in their online activities, and some classes were conducted in real time for live discussions. In addition, students underwent face-to-face assessments of their knowledge of the topic before and after the course. Statistical analysis was performed and the means of the overall scores were obtained, as were the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The means were compared by two-tailed paired t-tests and by the paired Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Of 814 eligible medical students, 606 (74.45%) completed the entire course during the study period. The mean score for knowledge of the topic was significantly higher on the final assessment than on the initial assessment (p <  0.001). We found that dedication (in hours) was directly proportional to the level of participation, as reflected in the mean final score (p = 0.009) and in the proportion of students who passed (p = 0.028). All of the participants considered their knowledge adequate or insufficient before the course, stating that it is quite important or important to address the topic during medical education. Although dedication levels were low, 70.5% stated that they had learned “quite a lot” or “more than expected” about the topic and would dedicate more time to it if they could. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a virtual learning environment can promote teaching and learning in the infectious diseases field, specifically for antimicrobial stewardship, increasing knowledge significantly, and should be considered for inclusion in the final stages of medical education. BioMed Central 2019-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6555969/ /pubmed/31174524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1623-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Laks, Michel
Guerra, Carla Morales
Miraglia, João Luiz
Medeiros, Eduardo Alexandrino
Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education
title Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education
title_full Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education
title_fullStr Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education
title_full_unstemmed Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education
title_short Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education
title_sort distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31174524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1623-x
work_keys_str_mv AT laksmichel distancelearninginantimicrobialstewardshipinnovationinmedicaleducation
AT guerracarlamorales distancelearninginantimicrobialstewardshipinnovationinmedicaleducation
AT miragliajoaoluiz distancelearninginantimicrobialstewardshipinnovationinmedicaleducation
AT medeiroseduardoalexandrino distancelearninginantimicrobialstewardshipinnovationinmedicaleducation