Cargando…

Dataset and protocols on the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation

Understanding how to best elicit consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for goods in an incentive-aligned way is one of the cornerstones in marketing planning decisions and consumer welfare theory. This article provides a dataset from an experiment with n = 107 consumers that measured the WTP for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lichters, Marcel, Wackershauser, Verena, Han, Shixing, Vogt, Bodo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6562191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31211206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104060
_version_ 1783426247260372992
author Lichters, Marcel
Wackershauser, Verena
Han, Shixing
Vogt, Bodo
author_facet Lichters, Marcel
Wackershauser, Verena
Han, Shixing
Vogt, Bodo
author_sort Lichters, Marcel
collection PubMed
description Understanding how to best elicit consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for goods in an incentive-aligned way is one of the cornerstones in marketing planning decisions and consumer welfare theory. This article provides a dataset from an experiment with n = 107 consumers that measured the WTP for a set of eight real consumer goods by means of the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism, entailing a facultative resell option. This procedure allows for testing the empirical incentive-compatibility of the BDM mechanism. Despite early evidence on lottery choices or fictitious goods, the empirical incentive-compatibility of the BDM mechanism in case of real consumer goods remains an under-researched topic. For the first time, we provide a dataset on consumers' WTP statements in such a paradigm. More precisely, this article provides experimental protocols, manipulation-check questions, full raw datasets, summary statistics, and model properties related to the research article entitled “On the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation” [Lichters et al., 2019]. The raw dataset allows for an independent analysis of consumers’ bidding behavior for multiple consumer goods. Thus, future researchers might use our dataset in a meta-analytic fashion for their own research on WTP elicitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6562191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65621912019-06-17 Dataset and protocols on the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation Lichters, Marcel Wackershauser, Verena Han, Shixing Vogt, Bodo Data Brief Business, Management and Accounting Understanding how to best elicit consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for goods in an incentive-aligned way is one of the cornerstones in marketing planning decisions and consumer welfare theory. This article provides a dataset from an experiment with n = 107 consumers that measured the WTP for a set of eight real consumer goods by means of the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism, entailing a facultative resell option. This procedure allows for testing the empirical incentive-compatibility of the BDM mechanism. Despite early evidence on lottery choices or fictitious goods, the empirical incentive-compatibility of the BDM mechanism in case of real consumer goods remains an under-researched topic. For the first time, we provide a dataset on consumers' WTP statements in such a paradigm. More precisely, this article provides experimental protocols, manipulation-check questions, full raw datasets, summary statistics, and model properties related to the research article entitled “On the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation” [Lichters et al., 2019]. The raw dataset allows for an independent analysis of consumers’ bidding behavior for multiple consumer goods. Thus, future researchers might use our dataset in a meta-analytic fashion for their own research on WTP elicitation. Elsevier 2019-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6562191/ /pubmed/31211206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104060 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Business, Management and Accounting
Lichters, Marcel
Wackershauser, Verena
Han, Shixing
Vogt, Bodo
Dataset and protocols on the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation
title Dataset and protocols on the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation
title_full Dataset and protocols on the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation
title_fullStr Dataset and protocols on the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Dataset and protocols on the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation
title_short Dataset and protocols on the applicability of the BDM mechanism in product evaluation
title_sort dataset and protocols on the applicability of the bdm mechanism in product evaluation
topic Business, Management and Accounting
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6562191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31211206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104060
work_keys_str_mv AT lichtersmarcel datasetandprotocolsontheapplicabilityofthebdmmechanisminproductevaluation
AT wackershauserverena datasetandprotocolsontheapplicabilityofthebdmmechanisminproductevaluation
AT hanshixing datasetandprotocolsontheapplicabilityofthebdmmechanisminproductevaluation
AT vogtbodo datasetandprotocolsontheapplicabilityofthebdmmechanisminproductevaluation