Cargando…

Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?

Objectives: Out-of-hours (OOH) services provide access to healthcare outside normal office hours, but the waiting time can sometimes be long. All callers must wait in the telephone queue, even if the health problem is urgent or life-threatening. We tested an emergency access button (EAB), which allo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebert, J. F., Huibers, L., Christensen, B., Lippert, F. K., Christensen, M. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31070507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1608067
_version_ 1783426952874426368
author Ebert, J. F.
Huibers, L.
Christensen, B.
Lippert, F. K.
Christensen, M. B.
author_facet Ebert, J. F.
Huibers, L.
Christensen, B.
Lippert, F. K.
Christensen, M. B.
author_sort Ebert, J. F.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Out-of-hours (OOH) services provide access to healthcare outside normal office hours, but the waiting time can sometimes be long. All callers must wait in the telephone queue, even if the health problem is urgent or life-threatening. We tested an emergency access button (EAB), which allowed callers with perceived severe health problems to bypass the queue. We aimed to investigate the severity of the health problems and the relevance of EAB use (assessed by triage professionals). Additionally, we aimed to calculate the number of suspected acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) and ambulance dispatches. Design: Descriptive study of a randomized intervention. Setting: OOH services in two major Danish healthcare regions. Subjects: 217,510 callers participated; 146,355 were randomized to intervention, and 6554 of 6631 (98.8%) questionnaires were completed by OOH triage professionals. Intervention: An EAB allowing randomly selected callers to bypass the telephone queue. Main outcome measures: Severity of contact and relevance of EAB use. Number of suspected AMIs and ambulance dispatches. Results: In both settings, contacts with EAB use concerned significantly more severe health problems than contacts without EAB use (p < 0.001). Triage professionals rated EAB use as “not relevant” in 23% of cases. Significantly more EAB users (10.4%) than EAB non-users (3.3% with EAB option and 1.7% without EAB option, p < 0.001) had a suspected AMI. Conclusions: KEY POINTS: Out-of-hours healthcare is challenged by increasing demand and long triage waiting times. An emergency access button may allow severely ill callers to jump the queue. Callers who bypassed the queue were more severely ill than callers who did not bypass the queue. Only 23% of bypassers presented “not relevant” health problems according to the triage staff.Trial registration: Identifier NCT02572115 registered at Clinicaltrials.gov on 5 October 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6566898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65668982019-06-21 Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue? Ebert, J. F. Huibers, L. Christensen, B. Lippert, F. K. Christensen, M. B. Scand J Prim Health Care Research Article Objectives: Out-of-hours (OOH) services provide access to healthcare outside normal office hours, but the waiting time can sometimes be long. All callers must wait in the telephone queue, even if the health problem is urgent or life-threatening. We tested an emergency access button (EAB), which allowed callers with perceived severe health problems to bypass the queue. We aimed to investigate the severity of the health problems and the relevance of EAB use (assessed by triage professionals). Additionally, we aimed to calculate the number of suspected acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) and ambulance dispatches. Design: Descriptive study of a randomized intervention. Setting: OOH services in two major Danish healthcare regions. Subjects: 217,510 callers participated; 146,355 were randomized to intervention, and 6554 of 6631 (98.8%) questionnaires were completed by OOH triage professionals. Intervention: An EAB allowing randomly selected callers to bypass the telephone queue. Main outcome measures: Severity of contact and relevance of EAB use. Number of suspected AMIs and ambulance dispatches. Results: In both settings, contacts with EAB use concerned significantly more severe health problems than contacts without EAB use (p < 0.001). Triage professionals rated EAB use as “not relevant” in 23% of cases. Significantly more EAB users (10.4%) than EAB non-users (3.3% with EAB option and 1.7% without EAB option, p < 0.001) had a suspected AMI. Conclusions: KEY POINTS: Out-of-hours healthcare is challenged by increasing demand and long triage waiting times. An emergency access button may allow severely ill callers to jump the queue. Callers who bypassed the queue were more severely ill than callers who did not bypass the queue. Only 23% of bypassers presented “not relevant” health problems according to the triage staff.Trial registration: Identifier NCT02572115 registered at Clinicaltrials.gov on 5 October 2015. Taylor & Francis 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6566898/ /pubmed/31070507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1608067 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ebert, J. F.
Huibers, L.
Christensen, B.
Lippert, F. K.
Christensen, M. B.
Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?
title Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?
title_full Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?
title_fullStr Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?
title_full_unstemmed Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?
title_short Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?
title_sort do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31070507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1608067
work_keys_str_mv AT ebertjf docallerstooutofhourscaremisuseanoptiontojumpthephonequeue
AT huibersl docallerstooutofhourscaremisuseanoptiontojumpthephonequeue
AT christensenb docallerstooutofhourscaremisuseanoptiontojumpthephonequeue
AT lippertfk docallerstooutofhourscaremisuseanoptiontojumpthephonequeue
AT christensenmb docallerstooutofhourscaremisuseanoptiontojumpthephonequeue