Cargando…

Comparison of quantitative trait loci methods: Total expression and allelic imbalance method in brain RNA-seq

BACKGROUND: Of the 108 Schizophrenia (SZ) risk-loci discovered through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), 96 are not altering the sequence of any protein. Evidence linking non-coding risk-SNPs and genes may be established using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). However, other approache...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gådin, Jesper R., Buil, Alfonso, Colantuoni, Carlo, Jaffe, Andrew E., Nielsen, Jacob, Shin, Joo-Heon, Hyde, Thomas M., Kleinman, Joel E., Plath, Niels, Eriksson, Per, Brunak, Søren, Didriksen, Michael, Weinberger, Daniel R., Folkersen, Lasse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6576752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217765
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Of the 108 Schizophrenia (SZ) risk-loci discovered through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), 96 are not altering the sequence of any protein. Evidence linking non-coding risk-SNPs and genes may be established using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). However, other approaches such allelic expression quantitative trait loci (aeQTL) also may be of use. METHODS: We applied both the eQTL and aeQTL analysis to a biobank of deeply sequenced RNA from 680 dorso-lateral pre-frontal cortex (DLPFC) samples. For each of 340 genes proximal to the SZ risk-SNPs, we asked how much SNP-genotype affected total expression (eQTL), as well as how much the expression ratio between the two alleles differed from 1:1 as a consequence of the risk-SNP genotype (aeQTL). RESULTS: We analyzed overlap with comparable eQTL-findings: 16 of the 30 risk-SNPs known to have gene-level eQTL also had gene-level aeQTL effects. 6 of 21 risk-SNPs with known splice-eQTL had exon-aeQTL effects. 12 novel potential risk genes were identified with the aeQTL approach, while 55 tested SNP-pairs were found as eQTL but not aeQTL. Of the tested 108 loci we could find at least one gene to be associated with 21 of the risk-SNPs using gene-level aeQTL, and with an additional 18 risk-SNPs using exon-level aeQTL. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the aeQTL strategy complements the eQTL approach to susceptibility gene identification.