Cargando…
Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breath testing has become a commonly used tool in gastroenterology to evaluate changes in the fermentation pattern of the gut microbiome. Currently, hydrogen and methane gas concentrations are measured in breath testing and evaluated against specific cut‐off values for interpreta...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31276041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12145 |
_version_ | 1783428902795870208 |
---|---|
author | Birg, Aleksandr Hu, Steve Lin, Henry C |
author_facet | Birg, Aleksandr Hu, Steve Lin, Henry C |
author_sort | Birg, Aleksandr |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breath testing has become a commonly used tool in gastroenterology to evaluate changes in the fermentation pattern of the gut microbiome. Currently, hydrogen and methane gas concentrations are measured in breath testing and evaluated against specific cut‐off values for interpretation as normal or abnormal. However, microbial gas kinetics is a complex process that is not currently fully considered when interpreting breath gas results. Gas exchange between hydrogen producers and hydrogen consumers (methanogens and sulfate‐reducing bacteria) is a process whereby hydrogen availability is determined by both its production and removal. Hydrogen sulfide is a crucial gas involved in this process as it is a major hydrogen‐consumptive pathway involved in energy exchange. METHODS: This is a cross‐sectional study evaluating lactulose breath testing with the inclusion of hydrogen sulfide measurements in patients referred for breath testing for gastrointestinal symptoms of bloating, excessive gas, and/or abdominal pain. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were analyzed between October 2016 and June 2017. Mean hydrogen concentrations with a positive trend through a 3‐h period (R (2) = 0.97), mean methane concentrations with a positive trend (R (2) = 0.69), and mean hydrogen sulfide concentrations with a negative trend (R (2) = −0.71) were observed. CONCLUSION: By incorporating energy exchange in the interpretation of the lactulose breath test, we reevaluated specific breath gas profiles, including those commonly described as “hydrogen nonproducers” and the “double‐peak” phenomenon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6586573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65865732019-07-02 Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements Birg, Aleksandr Hu, Steve Lin, Henry C JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breath testing has become a commonly used tool in gastroenterology to evaluate changes in the fermentation pattern of the gut microbiome. Currently, hydrogen and methane gas concentrations are measured in breath testing and evaluated against specific cut‐off values for interpretation as normal or abnormal. However, microbial gas kinetics is a complex process that is not currently fully considered when interpreting breath gas results. Gas exchange between hydrogen producers and hydrogen consumers (methanogens and sulfate‐reducing bacteria) is a process whereby hydrogen availability is determined by both its production and removal. Hydrogen sulfide is a crucial gas involved in this process as it is a major hydrogen‐consumptive pathway involved in energy exchange. METHODS: This is a cross‐sectional study evaluating lactulose breath testing with the inclusion of hydrogen sulfide measurements in patients referred for breath testing for gastrointestinal symptoms of bloating, excessive gas, and/or abdominal pain. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were analyzed between October 2016 and June 2017. Mean hydrogen concentrations with a positive trend through a 3‐h period (R (2) = 0.97), mean methane concentrations with a positive trend (R (2) = 0.69), and mean hydrogen sulfide concentrations with a negative trend (R (2) = −0.71) were observed. CONCLUSION: By incorporating energy exchange in the interpretation of the lactulose breath test, we reevaluated specific breath gas profiles, including those commonly described as “hydrogen nonproducers” and the “double‐peak” phenomenon. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6586573/ /pubmed/31276041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12145 Text en © 2019 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Birg, Aleksandr Hu, Steve Lin, Henry C Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements |
title | Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements |
title_full | Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements |
title_fullStr | Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements |
title_short | Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements |
title_sort | reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31276041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT birgaleksandr reevaluatingourunderstandingoflactulosebreathtestsbyincorporatinghydrogensulfidemeasurements AT husteve reevaluatingourunderstandingoflactulosebreathtestsbyincorporatinghydrogensulfidemeasurements AT linhenryc reevaluatingourunderstandingoflactulosebreathtestsbyincorporatinghydrogensulfidemeasurements |