Cargando…

Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breath testing has become a commonly used tool in gastroenterology to evaluate changes in the fermentation pattern of the gut microbiome. Currently, hydrogen and methane gas concentrations are measured in breath testing and evaluated against specific cut‐off values for interpreta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birg, Aleksandr, Hu, Steve, Lin, Henry C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31276041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12145
_version_ 1783428902795870208
author Birg, Aleksandr
Hu, Steve
Lin, Henry C
author_facet Birg, Aleksandr
Hu, Steve
Lin, Henry C
author_sort Birg, Aleksandr
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breath testing has become a commonly used tool in gastroenterology to evaluate changes in the fermentation pattern of the gut microbiome. Currently, hydrogen and methane gas concentrations are measured in breath testing and evaluated against specific cut‐off values for interpretation as normal or abnormal. However, microbial gas kinetics is a complex process that is not currently fully considered when interpreting breath gas results. Gas exchange between hydrogen producers and hydrogen consumers (methanogens and sulfate‐reducing bacteria) is a process whereby hydrogen availability is determined by both its production and removal. Hydrogen sulfide is a crucial gas involved in this process as it is a major hydrogen‐consumptive pathway involved in energy exchange. METHODS: This is a cross‐sectional study evaluating lactulose breath testing with the inclusion of hydrogen sulfide measurements in patients referred for breath testing for gastrointestinal symptoms of bloating, excessive gas, and/or abdominal pain. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were analyzed between October 2016 and June 2017. Mean hydrogen concentrations with a positive trend through a 3‐h period (R (2) = 0.97), mean methane concentrations with a positive trend (R (2) = 0.69), and mean hydrogen sulfide concentrations with a negative trend (R (2) = −0.71) were observed. CONCLUSION: By incorporating energy exchange in the interpretation of the lactulose breath test, we reevaluated specific breath gas profiles, including those commonly described as “hydrogen nonproducers” and the “double‐peak” phenomenon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6586573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65865732019-07-02 Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements Birg, Aleksandr Hu, Steve Lin, Henry C JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breath testing has become a commonly used tool in gastroenterology to evaluate changes in the fermentation pattern of the gut microbiome. Currently, hydrogen and methane gas concentrations are measured in breath testing and evaluated against specific cut‐off values for interpretation as normal or abnormal. However, microbial gas kinetics is a complex process that is not currently fully considered when interpreting breath gas results. Gas exchange between hydrogen producers and hydrogen consumers (methanogens and sulfate‐reducing bacteria) is a process whereby hydrogen availability is determined by both its production and removal. Hydrogen sulfide is a crucial gas involved in this process as it is a major hydrogen‐consumptive pathway involved in energy exchange. METHODS: This is a cross‐sectional study evaluating lactulose breath testing with the inclusion of hydrogen sulfide measurements in patients referred for breath testing for gastrointestinal symptoms of bloating, excessive gas, and/or abdominal pain. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were analyzed between October 2016 and June 2017. Mean hydrogen concentrations with a positive trend through a 3‐h period (R (2) = 0.97), mean methane concentrations with a positive trend (R (2) = 0.69), and mean hydrogen sulfide concentrations with a negative trend (R (2) = −0.71) were observed. CONCLUSION: By incorporating energy exchange in the interpretation of the lactulose breath test, we reevaluated specific breath gas profiles, including those commonly described as “hydrogen nonproducers” and the “double‐peak” phenomenon. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6586573/ /pubmed/31276041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12145 Text en © 2019 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Birg, Aleksandr
Hu, Steve
Lin, Henry C
Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements
title Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements
title_full Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements
title_fullStr Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements
title_full_unstemmed Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements
title_short Reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements
title_sort reevaluating our understanding of lactulose breath tests by incorporating hydrogen sulfide measurements
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31276041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12145
work_keys_str_mv AT birgaleksandr reevaluatingourunderstandingoflactulosebreathtestsbyincorporatinghydrogensulfidemeasurements
AT husteve reevaluatingourunderstandingoflactulosebreathtestsbyincorporatinghydrogensulfidemeasurements
AT linhenryc reevaluatingourunderstandingoflactulosebreathtestsbyincorporatinghydrogensulfidemeasurements