Cargando…

Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In-patient postgraduate teaching suffers with issues like long and unstructured presentations inclusive of a lot of historical information and time constraints due to increasing workload. A six-step pneumonic SNAPPS a learner-centered model modifies the learning encounter by condensing t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Vishakha, Rao, Siddharth, Jinadani, Mariya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1670-3
_version_ 1783429293823492096
author Jain, Vishakha
Rao, Siddharth
Jinadani, Mariya
author_facet Jain, Vishakha
Rao, Siddharth
Jinadani, Mariya
author_sort Jain, Vishakha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-patient postgraduate teaching suffers with issues like long and unstructured presentations inclusive of a lot of historical information and time constraints due to increasing workload. A six-step pneumonic SNAPPS a learner-centered model modifies the learning encounter by condensing the reporting of facts while encouraging clinical reasoning. This study was planned with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness of SNAPPS as compared to traditional case presentation for facilitating clinical reasoning in inpatient setting. We also wanted to understand perceptions of postgraduates and teachers about this new method of case presentation. METHODS: This open labeled randomized controlled trial was carried amongst the 18 residents of department of Medicine, MGIMS. The teachers and residents in the SNAPPS were sensitized to SNAPPS technique by using videos, role plays and handouts over 2 sessions of 30 min each. Twenty-seven case presentations (3/resident) were carried out in each group (total 54 case presentations). Data was recorded into validated data recording sheet after each presentation and feedback was taken from the teacher as well as residents regarding their perception. RESULTS: The SNAPPS model heralds a change in the preceptor training, pairing faulty development and learner development as companions in education. Guided by the SNAPPS technique, students summarized patient findings concisely (7 vs. 2.7 vs. 5.22vs. 2.33, p = 0.0057) while maintaining the same degree of thoroughness as in traditional case presentations. The students in the SNAPPS group were clearer about their diagnostic hypothesis and compared and contrasted their different diagnosis well (2.56 vs. 1.74, p value =0.002). The students in the SNAPPS group initiated patient management discussion almost 20% more times as compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that SNAPPS a learner centered technique for case presentations facilitated the expression of clinical diagnostic reasoning and case based uncertainties in the inpatient setting without extending the unusual length of the student case presentations. It also paved way for enhanced self-directed learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6588865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65888652019-07-08 Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial Jain, Vishakha Rao, Siddharth Jinadani, Mariya BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: In-patient postgraduate teaching suffers with issues like long and unstructured presentations inclusive of a lot of historical information and time constraints due to increasing workload. A six-step pneumonic SNAPPS a learner-centered model modifies the learning encounter by condensing the reporting of facts while encouraging clinical reasoning. This study was planned with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness of SNAPPS as compared to traditional case presentation for facilitating clinical reasoning in inpatient setting. We also wanted to understand perceptions of postgraduates and teachers about this new method of case presentation. METHODS: This open labeled randomized controlled trial was carried amongst the 18 residents of department of Medicine, MGIMS. The teachers and residents in the SNAPPS were sensitized to SNAPPS technique by using videos, role plays and handouts over 2 sessions of 30 min each. Twenty-seven case presentations (3/resident) were carried out in each group (total 54 case presentations). Data was recorded into validated data recording sheet after each presentation and feedback was taken from the teacher as well as residents regarding their perception. RESULTS: The SNAPPS model heralds a change in the preceptor training, pairing faulty development and learner development as companions in education. Guided by the SNAPPS technique, students summarized patient findings concisely (7 vs. 2.7 vs. 5.22vs. 2.33, p = 0.0057) while maintaining the same degree of thoroughness as in traditional case presentations. The students in the SNAPPS group were clearer about their diagnostic hypothesis and compared and contrasted their different diagnosis well (2.56 vs. 1.74, p value =0.002). The students in the SNAPPS group initiated patient management discussion almost 20% more times as compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that SNAPPS a learner centered technique for case presentations facilitated the expression of clinical diagnostic reasoning and case based uncertainties in the inpatient setting without extending the unusual length of the student case presentations. It also paved way for enhanced self-directed learning. BioMed Central 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6588865/ /pubmed/31226996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1670-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jain, Vishakha
Rao, Siddharth
Jinadani, Mariya
Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial
title Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of snapps for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6588865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1670-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jainvishakha effectivenessofsnappsforimprovingclinicalreasoninginpostgraduatesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT raosiddharth effectivenessofsnappsforimprovingclinicalreasoninginpostgraduatesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jinadanimariya effectivenessofsnappsforimprovingclinicalreasoninginpostgraduatesrandomizedcontrolledtrial