Cargando…

Are Hydroethidine-Based Probes Reliable for Reactive Oxygen Species Detection?

Detection and quantification of the highly reactive and short-lived superoxide (O(•)(2)(−)) can be challenging. Here, we present a new mass spectrometry (MS)-based method to detect and quantify O(•)(2)(−) using three fluorogenic hydroethidine probes: hydroethidine (HE), mito-hydroethidine (mito-HE),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Yi, Meierhofer, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29790367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ars.2018.7535
_version_ 1783431338465951744
author Xiao, Yi
Meierhofer, David
author_facet Xiao, Yi
Meierhofer, David
author_sort Xiao, Yi
collection PubMed
description Detection and quantification of the highly reactive and short-lived superoxide (O(•)(2)(−)) can be challenging. Here, we present a new mass spectrometry (MS)-based method to detect and quantify O(•)(2)(−) using three fluorogenic hydroethidine probes: hydroethidine (HE), mito-hydroethidine (mito-HE), and hydropropidine (HPr(+)), which measure cytosolic, mitochondrial, and extracellular O(•)(2)(−), respectively. The probes and their oxidation products were simultaneously quantified by applying multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) with MS that allowed the specific measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) distribution within the cell. The advantage of this liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method is that coeluting compounds can be precisely distinguished using specific precursor and fragment masses. This method overcomes limitations from spectral overlap of O(•)(2)(−)-specific and nonspecific products in fluorescence spectra or the low specificity associated with chromatography-based approaches. However, our experiments showed that these HE probes can be prone to autoxidation during incubation at 37°C in Hank's solution. Cell treatments with strong oxidants did not significantly increase levels of the O(•)(2)(−) radical. Thus, subtle changes in ROS levels in cell culture experiments might not be quantifiable. Our findings raise the question of whether HE-based probes can be used for the reliable detection of O(•)(2)(−) radicals in cell culture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6602104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66021042019-07-11 Are Hydroethidine-Based Probes Reliable for Reactive Oxygen Species Detection? Xiao, Yi Meierhofer, David Antioxid Redox Signal News & Views Detection and quantification of the highly reactive and short-lived superoxide (O(•)(2)(−)) can be challenging. Here, we present a new mass spectrometry (MS)-based method to detect and quantify O(•)(2)(−) using three fluorogenic hydroethidine probes: hydroethidine (HE), mito-hydroethidine (mito-HE), and hydropropidine (HPr(+)), which measure cytosolic, mitochondrial, and extracellular O(•)(2)(−), respectively. The probes and their oxidation products were simultaneously quantified by applying multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) with MS that allowed the specific measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) distribution within the cell. The advantage of this liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method is that coeluting compounds can be precisely distinguished using specific precursor and fragment masses. This method overcomes limitations from spectral overlap of O(•)(2)(−)-specific and nonspecific products in fluorescence spectra or the low specificity associated with chromatography-based approaches. However, our experiments showed that these HE probes can be prone to autoxidation during incubation at 37°C in Hank's solution. Cell treatments with strong oxidants did not significantly increase levels of the O(•)(2)(−) radical. Thus, subtle changes in ROS levels in cell culture experiments might not be quantifiable. Our findings raise the question of whether HE-based probes can be used for the reliable detection of O(•)(2)(−) radicals in cell culture. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019-08-01 2019-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6602104/ /pubmed/29790367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ars.2018.7535 Text en © Yi Xiao and David Meierhofer 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits and noncommercial use, distributions, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and the source are cited.
spellingShingle News & Views
Xiao, Yi
Meierhofer, David
Are Hydroethidine-Based Probes Reliable for Reactive Oxygen Species Detection?
title Are Hydroethidine-Based Probes Reliable for Reactive Oxygen Species Detection?
title_full Are Hydroethidine-Based Probes Reliable for Reactive Oxygen Species Detection?
title_fullStr Are Hydroethidine-Based Probes Reliable for Reactive Oxygen Species Detection?
title_full_unstemmed Are Hydroethidine-Based Probes Reliable for Reactive Oxygen Species Detection?
title_short Are Hydroethidine-Based Probes Reliable for Reactive Oxygen Species Detection?
title_sort are hydroethidine-based probes reliable for reactive oxygen species detection?
topic News & Views
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6602104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29790367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ars.2018.7535
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyi arehydroethidinebasedprobesreliableforreactiveoxygenspeciesdetection
AT meierhoferdavid arehydroethidinebasedprobesreliableforreactiveoxygenspeciesdetection