Cargando…

The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy

BACKGROUND: We present a robot-assisted telerehabilitation system that allows for haptic interaction between therapist and patient over distance. It consists of two arm therapy robots. Attached to one robot the therapists can feel on their own arm the limitations of the patient’s arm which is attach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baur, Kilian, Rohrbach, Nina, Hermsdörfer, Joachim, Riener, Robert, Klamroth-Marganska, Verena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0547-3
_version_ 1783434331214053376
author Baur, Kilian
Rohrbach, Nina
Hermsdörfer, Joachim
Riener, Robert
Klamroth-Marganska, Verena
author_facet Baur, Kilian
Rohrbach, Nina
Hermsdörfer, Joachim
Riener, Robert
Klamroth-Marganska, Verena
author_sort Baur, Kilian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We present a robot-assisted telerehabilitation system that allows for haptic interaction between therapist and patient over distance. It consists of two arm therapy robots. Attached to one robot the therapists can feel on their own arm the limitations of the patient’s arm which is attached to the other robot. Due to the exoskeleton structure of the robot, movements can be performed in the three-dimensional space. METHODS: Fifteen physical and occupational therapists tested this strategy, named “Beam-Me-In”, while using an exoskeleton robot connected to a second exoskeleton robot in the same room used by the study experimenter. Furthermore, the therapists assessed the level of impairment of recorded and simulated arm movements. They quantified four typical impairments of stroke patients: reduced range of motion (active and passive), resistance to passive movement, a lack of ability to fractionate a movement, and disturbed quality of movement. RESULTS: On a Likert Scale (0 to 5 points) therapists rated the “Beam-Me-In” strategy as a very useful medium (mode: 4 points) to evaluate a patient’s progress over time. The passive range of motion of the elbow joint was assessed with a mean absolute error of 4.9(∘) (absolute precision error: 6.4(∘)). The active range of motion of the elbow was assessed with a mean absolute error of 4.9(∘) (absolute precision error: 6.5(∘)). The resistance to passive movement (i.e. modified Tardieu Scale) and the lack of ability to fractionate a movement (i.e. quantification of pathological muscle synergies) was assessed with an inter-rater reliability of 0.930 and 0.948, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The “Beam-Me-In” strategy is a promising approach to complement robot-assisted movement training. It can serve as a platform to assess and identify abnormal movement patterns in patients. This is the first application of remote three-dimensional haptic assessmen t applied to telerehabilitation. Furthermore, the “Beam-Me-In” strategy has a potential to overcome barriers for therapists regarding robot-assisted telerehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6625018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66250182019-07-23 The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy Baur, Kilian Rohrbach, Nina Hermsdörfer, Joachim Riener, Robert Klamroth-Marganska, Verena J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: We present a robot-assisted telerehabilitation system that allows for haptic interaction between therapist and patient over distance. It consists of two arm therapy robots. Attached to one robot the therapists can feel on their own arm the limitations of the patient’s arm which is attached to the other robot. Due to the exoskeleton structure of the robot, movements can be performed in the three-dimensional space. METHODS: Fifteen physical and occupational therapists tested this strategy, named “Beam-Me-In”, while using an exoskeleton robot connected to a second exoskeleton robot in the same room used by the study experimenter. Furthermore, the therapists assessed the level of impairment of recorded and simulated arm movements. They quantified four typical impairments of stroke patients: reduced range of motion (active and passive), resistance to passive movement, a lack of ability to fractionate a movement, and disturbed quality of movement. RESULTS: On a Likert Scale (0 to 5 points) therapists rated the “Beam-Me-In” strategy as a very useful medium (mode: 4 points) to evaluate a patient’s progress over time. The passive range of motion of the elbow joint was assessed with a mean absolute error of 4.9(∘) (absolute precision error: 6.4(∘)). The active range of motion of the elbow was assessed with a mean absolute error of 4.9(∘) (absolute precision error: 6.5(∘)). The resistance to passive movement (i.e. modified Tardieu Scale) and the lack of ability to fractionate a movement (i.e. quantification of pathological muscle synergies) was assessed with an inter-rater reliability of 0.930 and 0.948, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The “Beam-Me-In” strategy is a promising approach to complement robot-assisted movement training. It can serve as a platform to assess and identify abnormal movement patterns in patients. This is the first application of remote three-dimensional haptic assessmen t applied to telerehabilitation. Furthermore, the “Beam-Me-In” strategy has a potential to overcome barriers for therapists regarding robot-assisted telerehabilitation. BioMed Central 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6625018/ /pubmed/31296226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0547-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Baur, Kilian
Rohrbach, Nina
Hermsdörfer, Joachim
Riener, Robert
Klamroth-Marganska, Verena
The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy
title The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy
title_full The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy
title_fullStr The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy
title_full_unstemmed The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy
title_short The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy
title_sort “beam-me-in strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0547-3
work_keys_str_mv AT baurkilian thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy
AT rohrbachnina thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy
AT hermsdorferjoachim thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy
AT rienerrobert thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy
AT klamrothmarganskaverena thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy
AT baurkilian beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy
AT rohrbachnina beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy
AT hermsdorferjoachim beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy
AT rienerrobert beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy
AT klamrothmarganskaverena beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy