Cargando…
The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy
BACKGROUND: We present a robot-assisted telerehabilitation system that allows for haptic interaction between therapist and patient over distance. It consists of two arm therapy robots. Attached to one robot the therapists can feel on their own arm the limitations of the patient’s arm which is attach...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0547-3 |
_version_ | 1783434331214053376 |
---|---|
author | Baur, Kilian Rohrbach, Nina Hermsdörfer, Joachim Riener, Robert Klamroth-Marganska, Verena |
author_facet | Baur, Kilian Rohrbach, Nina Hermsdörfer, Joachim Riener, Robert Klamroth-Marganska, Verena |
author_sort | Baur, Kilian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We present a robot-assisted telerehabilitation system that allows for haptic interaction between therapist and patient over distance. It consists of two arm therapy robots. Attached to one robot the therapists can feel on their own arm the limitations of the patient’s arm which is attached to the other robot. Due to the exoskeleton structure of the robot, movements can be performed in the three-dimensional space. METHODS: Fifteen physical and occupational therapists tested this strategy, named “Beam-Me-In”, while using an exoskeleton robot connected to a second exoskeleton robot in the same room used by the study experimenter. Furthermore, the therapists assessed the level of impairment of recorded and simulated arm movements. They quantified four typical impairments of stroke patients: reduced range of motion (active and passive), resistance to passive movement, a lack of ability to fractionate a movement, and disturbed quality of movement. RESULTS: On a Likert Scale (0 to 5 points) therapists rated the “Beam-Me-In” strategy as a very useful medium (mode: 4 points) to evaluate a patient’s progress over time. The passive range of motion of the elbow joint was assessed with a mean absolute error of 4.9(∘) (absolute precision error: 6.4(∘)). The active range of motion of the elbow was assessed with a mean absolute error of 4.9(∘) (absolute precision error: 6.5(∘)). The resistance to passive movement (i.e. modified Tardieu Scale) and the lack of ability to fractionate a movement (i.e. quantification of pathological muscle synergies) was assessed with an inter-rater reliability of 0.930 and 0.948, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The “Beam-Me-In” strategy is a promising approach to complement robot-assisted movement training. It can serve as a platform to assess and identify abnormal movement patterns in patients. This is the first application of remote three-dimensional haptic assessmen t applied to telerehabilitation. Furthermore, the “Beam-Me-In” strategy has a potential to overcome barriers for therapists regarding robot-assisted telerehabilitation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6625018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66250182019-07-23 The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy Baur, Kilian Rohrbach, Nina Hermsdörfer, Joachim Riener, Robert Klamroth-Marganska, Verena J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: We present a robot-assisted telerehabilitation system that allows for haptic interaction between therapist and patient over distance. It consists of two arm therapy robots. Attached to one robot the therapists can feel on their own arm the limitations of the patient’s arm which is attached to the other robot. Due to the exoskeleton structure of the robot, movements can be performed in the three-dimensional space. METHODS: Fifteen physical and occupational therapists tested this strategy, named “Beam-Me-In”, while using an exoskeleton robot connected to a second exoskeleton robot in the same room used by the study experimenter. Furthermore, the therapists assessed the level of impairment of recorded and simulated arm movements. They quantified four typical impairments of stroke patients: reduced range of motion (active and passive), resistance to passive movement, a lack of ability to fractionate a movement, and disturbed quality of movement. RESULTS: On a Likert Scale (0 to 5 points) therapists rated the “Beam-Me-In” strategy as a very useful medium (mode: 4 points) to evaluate a patient’s progress over time. The passive range of motion of the elbow joint was assessed with a mean absolute error of 4.9(∘) (absolute precision error: 6.4(∘)). The active range of motion of the elbow was assessed with a mean absolute error of 4.9(∘) (absolute precision error: 6.5(∘)). The resistance to passive movement (i.e. modified Tardieu Scale) and the lack of ability to fractionate a movement (i.e. quantification of pathological muscle synergies) was assessed with an inter-rater reliability of 0.930 and 0.948, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The “Beam-Me-In” strategy is a promising approach to complement robot-assisted movement training. It can serve as a platform to assess and identify abnormal movement patterns in patients. This is the first application of remote three-dimensional haptic assessmen t applied to telerehabilitation. Furthermore, the “Beam-Me-In” strategy has a potential to overcome barriers for therapists regarding robot-assisted telerehabilitation. BioMed Central 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6625018/ /pubmed/31296226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0547-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Baur, Kilian Rohrbach, Nina Hermsdörfer, Joachim Riener, Robert Klamroth-Marganska, Verena The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy |
title | The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy |
title_full | The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy |
title_fullStr | The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy |
title_short | The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy |
title_sort | “beam-me-in strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0547-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baurkilian thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy AT rohrbachnina thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy AT hermsdorferjoachim thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy AT rienerrobert thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy AT klamrothmarganskaverena thebeammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy AT baurkilian beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy AT rohrbachnina beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy AT hermsdorferjoachim beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy AT rienerrobert beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy AT klamrothmarganskaverena beammeinstrategyremotehaptictherapistpatientinteractionwithtwoexoskeletonsforstroketherapy |