Cargando…
Cell Wall Polymer Composition and Spatial Distribution in Ripe Banana and Mango Fruit: Implications for Cell Adhesion and Texture Perception
Banana (Musa acuminata) and mango (Mangifera indica) are two of the most popular fruits eaten worldwide. They both soften during ripening but their textural attributes are markedly different. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanism underpinning textural differences between banana and m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00858 |
_version_ | 1783435183469363200 |
---|---|
author | Rongkaumpan, Ganittha Amsbury, Sam Andablo-Reyes, Efren Linford, Holly Connell, Simon Knox, J. Paul Sarkar, Anwesha Benitez-Alfonso, Yoselin Orfila, Caroline |
author_facet | Rongkaumpan, Ganittha Amsbury, Sam Andablo-Reyes, Efren Linford, Holly Connell, Simon Knox, J. Paul Sarkar, Anwesha Benitez-Alfonso, Yoselin Orfila, Caroline |
author_sort | Rongkaumpan, Ganittha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Banana (Musa acuminata) and mango (Mangifera indica) are two of the most popular fruits eaten worldwide. They both soften during ripening but their textural attributes are markedly different. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanism underpinning textural differences between banana and mango. We used a novel combination of methods at different scales to analyse the surface properties of fruit cells and the potential contribution of cells and cell wall components to oral processing and texture perception. The results indicated that cell separation occurred easily in both organs under mild mechanical stress. Banana cells showed distinctively elongated shapes with distinct distribution of pectin and hemicellulose epitopes at the cell surface. In contrast, mango had relatively spherical cells that ruptured during cell separation. Atomic force microscopy detected soft surfaces indicative of middle lamella remnants on banana cells, while mango cells had cleaner, smoother surfaces, suggesting absence of middle lamellae and more advanced cell wall disassembly. Comparison of solubilized polymers by cell wall glycome analysis showed abundance of mannan and feruylated xylan in separation exudate from banana but not mango, but comparable levels of pectin and arabinogalactan proteins. Bulk rheology experiments showed that both fruits had similar apparent viscosity and hence might be extrapolated to have similar “oral thickness” perception. On the other hand, oral tribology experiments showed significant differences in their frictional behavior at orally relevant speeds. The instrumental lubrication behavior can be interpreted as “smooth” mouthfeel for mango as compared to “astringent” or “dry” for banana in the later stages of oral processing. The results suggest that cell wall surface properties contribute to lubricating behavior associated with textural perception in the oral phase. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6629905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66299052019-07-23 Cell Wall Polymer Composition and Spatial Distribution in Ripe Banana and Mango Fruit: Implications for Cell Adhesion and Texture Perception Rongkaumpan, Ganittha Amsbury, Sam Andablo-Reyes, Efren Linford, Holly Connell, Simon Knox, J. Paul Sarkar, Anwesha Benitez-Alfonso, Yoselin Orfila, Caroline Front Plant Sci Plant Science Banana (Musa acuminata) and mango (Mangifera indica) are two of the most popular fruits eaten worldwide. They both soften during ripening but their textural attributes are markedly different. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanism underpinning textural differences between banana and mango. We used a novel combination of methods at different scales to analyse the surface properties of fruit cells and the potential contribution of cells and cell wall components to oral processing and texture perception. The results indicated that cell separation occurred easily in both organs under mild mechanical stress. Banana cells showed distinctively elongated shapes with distinct distribution of pectin and hemicellulose epitopes at the cell surface. In contrast, mango had relatively spherical cells that ruptured during cell separation. Atomic force microscopy detected soft surfaces indicative of middle lamella remnants on banana cells, while mango cells had cleaner, smoother surfaces, suggesting absence of middle lamellae and more advanced cell wall disassembly. Comparison of solubilized polymers by cell wall glycome analysis showed abundance of mannan and feruylated xylan in separation exudate from banana but not mango, but comparable levels of pectin and arabinogalactan proteins. Bulk rheology experiments showed that both fruits had similar apparent viscosity and hence might be extrapolated to have similar “oral thickness” perception. On the other hand, oral tribology experiments showed significant differences in their frictional behavior at orally relevant speeds. The instrumental lubrication behavior can be interpreted as “smooth” mouthfeel for mango as compared to “astringent” or “dry” for banana in the later stages of oral processing. The results suggest that cell wall surface properties contribute to lubricating behavior associated with textural perception in the oral phase. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6629905/ /pubmed/31338100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00858 Text en Copyright © 2019 Rongkaumpan, Amsbury, Andablo-Reyes, Linford, Connell, Knox, Sarkar, Benitez-Alfonso and Orfila. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Rongkaumpan, Ganittha Amsbury, Sam Andablo-Reyes, Efren Linford, Holly Connell, Simon Knox, J. Paul Sarkar, Anwesha Benitez-Alfonso, Yoselin Orfila, Caroline Cell Wall Polymer Composition and Spatial Distribution in Ripe Banana and Mango Fruit: Implications for Cell Adhesion and Texture Perception |
title | Cell Wall Polymer Composition and Spatial Distribution in Ripe Banana and Mango Fruit: Implications for Cell Adhesion and Texture Perception |
title_full | Cell Wall Polymer Composition and Spatial Distribution in Ripe Banana and Mango Fruit: Implications for Cell Adhesion and Texture Perception |
title_fullStr | Cell Wall Polymer Composition and Spatial Distribution in Ripe Banana and Mango Fruit: Implications for Cell Adhesion and Texture Perception |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell Wall Polymer Composition and Spatial Distribution in Ripe Banana and Mango Fruit: Implications for Cell Adhesion and Texture Perception |
title_short | Cell Wall Polymer Composition and Spatial Distribution in Ripe Banana and Mango Fruit: Implications for Cell Adhesion and Texture Perception |
title_sort | cell wall polymer composition and spatial distribution in ripe banana and mango fruit: implications for cell adhesion and texture perception |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00858 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rongkaumpanganittha cellwallpolymercompositionandspatialdistributioninripebananaandmangofruitimplicationsforcelladhesionandtextureperception AT amsburysam cellwallpolymercompositionandspatialdistributioninripebananaandmangofruitimplicationsforcelladhesionandtextureperception AT andabloreyesefren cellwallpolymercompositionandspatialdistributioninripebananaandmangofruitimplicationsforcelladhesionandtextureperception AT linfordholly cellwallpolymercompositionandspatialdistributioninripebananaandmangofruitimplicationsforcelladhesionandtextureperception AT connellsimon cellwallpolymercompositionandspatialdistributioninripebananaandmangofruitimplicationsforcelladhesionandtextureperception AT knoxjpaul cellwallpolymercompositionandspatialdistributioninripebananaandmangofruitimplicationsforcelladhesionandtextureperception AT sarkaranwesha cellwallpolymercompositionandspatialdistributioninripebananaandmangofruitimplicationsforcelladhesionandtextureperception AT benitezalfonsoyoselin cellwallpolymercompositionandspatialdistributioninripebananaandmangofruitimplicationsforcelladhesionandtextureperception AT orfilacaroline cellwallpolymercompositionandspatialdistributioninripebananaandmangofruitimplicationsforcelladhesionandtextureperception |